Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 08 2018

Consensual review edit

File:Empty Coca-Cola bottle crate, Mahamaya Lake.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Empty Coca-Cola case, Mahamaya Lake --Moheen 18:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, this image looks great at preview size but what's in focus (the coca-cola logo) isn't very sharp due to the wrong settings (ISO800 in broad daylight / 1/800s on a static object) --Trougnouf 23:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Trougnouf.--Ermell 16:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Weak support I agree about the comment on the setting but the result IMO is still acceptable. --Basotxerri 17:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Trougnouf. Sharpness not sufficiant, burnt highlights. With low (resp. native) ISO settings most cameras can handle high contrast scenes better. --Smial 10:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Basotxerri 16:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_position_of_Parantica_aglea_Stoll,_1782_–_Glassy_Tiger_Butterflies_of_pakke_tiger_reserve.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Close wing position of Parantica aglea melanoides Moore, 1883 – Himalayan Glassy Tiger (by Subhendukhan) --Atudu 04:20, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 05:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not until the CA has been fixed. --GerifalteDelSabana 00:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment At 100% size, look at the white spots. The CA is very prominent. --GerifalteDelSabana 23:31, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  • I see what you're seeing, but I don't know what this butterfly should look like. -- Ikan Kekek 11:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Provisional   Oppose so that Subhendukhan can address whether there is chromatic aberration in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 04:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too low DOF (Head is unsharp), slight overexposure, no detail in bright areas. Rather harsh frontal lighting.--Smial 10:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 20:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)