Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 13 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Vista_de_Oporto_desde_Terreiro_da_Sé,_Portugal,_2012-05-09,_DD_05.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination View of Porto from Terreiro da Sé, Portugal --Poco a poco 14:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Strong loss in sharpness to the left. Is there anything you can do? --Ermell 16:38, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Still unsharp. --Ermell 22:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - DoF for full-on focus is shorter than usual for this kind of composition at QIC, but the overall picture looks good to me, and the effect sure looks intentional to me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Erntezeit_auf_dem_Dänischen_Wohld.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The work is done. Harvest on the Danish Wahld on the Baltic coast of Schleswig-Holstein --Milseburg 13:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Not very sharp: wrong camera settings, sorry --Moroder 07:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   CommentI think the sharpness is average for a QI and the composition is even better. The fact that the Danish islands are recognizable on the horizon in the original resolution, I find also noteworthy. I want to read some other opinions. --Milseburg 19:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Since two thirds of the image are the near field, I'm not interested in the Danish Islands --Moroder 22:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support It is OK for me --Llez 05:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Pretty solid QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. I can't see wrong camera settings. ISO80 is lowest possible, and the lens seems to be pretty good at f/2.8. A small sensor camera will increase blurring by diffraction if stopped down even at f/4. --Smial 13:17, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks sharp enough to me at full screen on a 24-inch monitor. And it's well lit, with a pleasing composition. --Bobulous 17:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Wey_VV7_PHEV_at_IAA_2019_IMG_0722.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Wey VV7 PHEV at Frankfurt Motor Show 2019.--Alexander-93 09:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC))
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I do not understand why you cut the photos so close. A good picture also includes some environment. --Steindy 01:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
      Comment after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - In order to eliminate as many distractions as possible. You've seen pictures from car conventions with wider crops, right? They're usually way too distracting. As it is, even what's in this photo may be too distracting, and I'm not sure I'll vote pro or con. -- Ikan Kekek 07:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I'm going to vote against this on the basis that there are too many distractions, including part of the wheels of another car. Let's have more discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Milseburg 19:28, 12 November 2019 (UTC)