Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 14 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Obelisco_Guglielmo_Marconi.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Guglielmo Marconi obelisk at EUR, Rome --Livioandronico2013 19:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Comment I think it needs perspective correction (see building behind)--C messier 16:03, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
      Done ευχαριστίες for review --Livioandronico2013 16:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
    C messier can you check? --Livioandronico2013 09:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
    @Livioandronico2013: you haven't uploaded a new version. Also needs sharpening and brightening. Mattbuck 21:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
    Ops     Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 22:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
    A little soft, but I think is acceptable for QI. Weak   Support. --C messier 11:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    It's minor, and this is not an oppose, but the left side is actually leaning out now. @Livioandronico2013: could you fix this please? --Mattbuck 22:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
      Done Ok now Matt? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 23:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    There's astill a lean of about 1 pixel in the height of a window, but better. Interestingly this will actually br promoted quicker now than it would have been if it hadn't gone to discuss. Mattbuck 08:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support. QI for me though the third car at the right should not park so tight behind the second one. ;-) -- Spurzem 20:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_kościół_Narodzenia_NMP_12.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Interior of parish church in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 18:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. (Dark part at the top is IMO acceptable.) --XRay 16:50, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
    Perspective needs correcting - the sides are leaning out. --Mattbuck 20:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
  Done--Jacek Halicki 16:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
OK then. Mattbuck 23:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Mosaïque_nilotique,_Praeneste,_Italie.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Life on the Nile during the flood, mosaic. End of 2nd century BCE. --Yann 10:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Noticable black edging - what was this cropped from? Mattbuck 21:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
      Not done Mattbuck 19:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
    New version. Better? --Yann 13:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
    Yes. Mattbuck 23:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Verbascum_sinuatum,_Sète_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Verbascum sinuatum (Wavyleaf Mullein) --Christian Ferrer 18:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Sorry, but it is only partially sharp and noisy. --Hockei 21:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
      Done for the noise, the area in focus is sharp enough IMO --Christian Ferrer 22:22, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

  Support--Hubertl 16:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC) For me ok now.   Support Ram-Man 13:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 14:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kardoen (Cynara cardunculus), Locatie De Kruidhof 01.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Cardoon (Cynara cardunculus), Location The Kruidhof.
    Famberhorst 05:38, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
      Comment The shadow is too dark. I'm sure you can make it brighter. --Hockei 21:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
      Done Small correction. --Famberhorst 08:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)}
  •   Support Updated version is good.Crisco 1492 12:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes! --Hockei 18:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support. -- Spurzem 22:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ram-Man 15:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 14:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Iris_oratoria,_Bois_des_Aresquiers_02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Iris oratoria --Christian Ferrer 09:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Unsharp, partly from diffraction and partly from the relatively long exposure. --Crisco 1492 15:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Sharpness is indeed not the best, but main subject is sharp enough IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
      •   Oppose I don’t think so. The quality standard of insect pictures is rather high on Commons, pushing this one below the sharpness limit. Even File:Iris_oratoria_Gruissan.jpg is sharper, pity it wasn’t the best of cameras. --Kreuzschnabel 10:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 16:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Christian Ferrer 14:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Bad Wörishofen - Kurpark (2012-07-12 Sp 02).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Fountain in the spa garden of Bad Wörishofen, Germany -- Spurzem 22:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Comment Too dark. --Hockei 21:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
    Now, it is the natural brightness. Not underexposed and not overexposed. -- Spurzem 07:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
      Comment That is my assessment. Especially the shadow parts are too dark for me. You can let it as it is or try to make it a bit brighter so that I can support it. --Hockei 12:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
    Than I ask discussion. -- Spurzem 15:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done. Now it is a bit brighter and the CAs are removed. -- Spurzem 11:07, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Better. Hockei (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lake Garda - View from Monte Baldo.jpg edit

 

per others. Noisy and overprocessed, killing detail. The pic should at least be sharp. --Kreuzschnabel 10:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mealybugs on flower stem, Yogyakarta, 2014-10-31.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mealybugs on a flower stem, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Crisco 1492 03:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • weak   Oppose I looked at this picture several times. For me it is not sharp enough. --Hockei 18:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Equally weak   Support: I don't think it's that bad, so let's discuss. There is a thin white border at the right side that probably should be cropped, though. --El Grafo 13:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Christian Ferrer 15:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done White bar cropped.Crisco 1492 15:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support It's illustrative and the quality does not detract from that. While borderline, it is good enough. Ram-Man 15:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 14:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 06.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Legong Bapang Saba (Balinese-style) dance, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Crisco 1492 10:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Grainy, especially noticeable on the face of the lady in the back. The face of the other lady is hidden. --Uoaei1 19:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree. Neither lady mentioned is the focus of the shot. --Crisco 1492 23:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Somewhat noisy regarding only ISO800, but all in all absolutely acceptable as QI. Nice lighting. Of course it would have been nice, if the face of the lady at the right side would not be hidden, and to have somewhat more DOF, but, hey, this is QIC, not "perfect composition contest". --Smial 13:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Noise... --Livioandronico2013 21:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support. Very good! Excellent composition, great colors. -- Spurzem 10:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 14:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Retford railway station MMB 21 144010.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: 144010 at Retford. Mattbuck 07:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review   Oppose Not sharp. --Hockei 18:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
    The train is sharp, but there is a heat haze. --Mattbuck 21:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The train yes, but not more in direction to the foreground. For me it is not enough. --Hockei 12:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support One of the more interesting images of obscure british trains and train stations ;-) -- Smial 13:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose For Hockei and very disturbing on right --Livioandronico2013 21:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial --Christian Ferrer 08:46, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:RosasenMardelPlata.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Roses in Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Species needed. --Kadellar 13:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 19:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
    No, not done! --Kadellar 17:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose - Overexposed. Mattbuck 21:24, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Overexposition fixed, added description Ezarate 21:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Still burnt highlights in relevant areas, not fixable. -- Smial 13:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Christian Ferrer 14:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Cala_de_la_Granadella,_Jávea,_España,_2014-07-01,_DD_23.JPG edit

  • Nomination Granadella Beach, Javea, Spain --Poco a poco 17:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --JLPC 15:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)  Oppose Sorry, I want other opinions. Crops are unfortunate, too much sky, I don't understand the composition. No offense, but it looks like a snapshot to me.--Jebulon 21:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Slight overexposure, unsharp esp. in the top right corner. -- Smial 13:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The people in the scene make it uninteresting. I agree with both. --Ruthven 14:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Many technical flaws but why should people in the scene make a picture uninteresting, I am sure of the contrary --Moroder 09:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Christian Ferrer 14:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:West Ham station MMB 07 1996 Stock.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Jubilee Line train at West Ham. Mattbuck 08:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Interesting interplay of shapes, but that blurred area at right is a little distracting --Daniel Case 15:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
      Support Only through the blur in the foreground wins the photo depth. For me QI. Therefore discuss. --Steindy 12:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

  Oppose For me Daniel Case have right. --Livioandronico2013 17:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

  • weak   Support shadows a bit dark --Christian Ferrer 14:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Münster,_LVM_--_2014_--_3804.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Office building of the LVM Versicherung, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)  Oppose nice and good light, but no valuable reason for such a non corrected distortion.--Jebulon 21:07, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Jebulon, please have a look at some of the horrible "corrected" photos of this building. And please don't mix lens distortion with possible perspective issues. This photo is an absolute justified photographic representation of the local situation. -- Smial 14:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

  Support --Livioandronico2013 10:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kunak_Sabah_Mostyn-Cave-03.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Kunak, Sabah: Entrance to Mostyn Cave --Cccefalon 00:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. --XRay 12:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose For me, not QI. The palm leaves are frayed top right. Poor picture composition, because the neck does not fit. Either should all be in the photo the palm trees, or not at all. --Steindy 12:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      reworked from scratch Thank you for the hint with the CA. I reworked the image from scratch. Should be better now. Concerning the oil palm trees, I disagree. They are just background for the cave's entrance. No need to show them entirely. --Cccefalon 13:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

  Support --Livioandronico2013 10:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 14:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Set_fra_vejen_fra_Agri.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Poskær Stenhus (Dolmen) seen from the road north of Agri --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Not sharp, sorry. --Hockei 17:45, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
    Okay, it has been sharpened in new software. Villy Fink Isaksen 19:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree - I want the new version evaluated --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak   Support Much better. --Hockei 20:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 14:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kostel sv. Jana Křtitele a Panny Marie Karmelské - Smolotely (11).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wayside cross in front of church of Saint John the Baptist and Our Lady of Mount Carmel at Maková hora, Czech Republic --Chmee2 14:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Code 15:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)at least 3 dustpots (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 05:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done --Christian Ferrer 08:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
    • @   Done Christian Ferrer: Hi, I am deeply sorry, I totally overlooked your comment. You were right, there were dustspots. I removed them so please, feel free to revoke your vote if you like it. Best regards --Chmee2 12:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Chmee2, ok but now I see 3 others at right not easy to see (see note) --Christian Ferrer 16:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    •   Done thanks for second review! Best regards --Chmee2 19:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 08:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lahore Fort view from Baradari.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Lahore Fort in Lahore — top-10 finalists of WLM Pakistan 2014. (by User:Rohaan Bhatti) --Saqib 00:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Perspective correction needed. Can be corrected. Yann 14:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I think this works as is. Mattbuck 23:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Agree with Mattbuck although geometric correction would be an improvement Alvesgaspar 17:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Yann and... Alvesgaspar second part.--Jebulon 22:01, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A very beautiful photo, as if the blue foreground would not. This is too dominant and disturb the overall impression. Sorry --Steindy 10:58, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice Idea.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 00:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support As for mattbuck. Somewhat high colour saturation. -- Smial 14:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support so as it is, see mattbuck. please don't distort the Photo. --Ralf Roletschek 22:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Excellent composition and photo frame, however, too small for a NIKON D3100 --The Photographer 15:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Botanischer Garten Berlin-Dahlem 10-2014 photo17 Dianthus imereticus.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Dianthus imereticus in the Botanical Garden of Berlin --A.Savin 11:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 13:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose The background is too noisy for QI IMO. Maybe chromatic noise(?). --Hockei 13:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • weak   Support: Quality is ok, but I would prefer a tighter crop. --MB-one 13:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  Oppose Per Hockei --Livioandronico2013 14:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Neutral. As MB-one. The crop should be tighter. -- Spurzem 22:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I know that a right DoF is impossible to get in this case, but despite that, the mix of blurred and distinct leafs around the flowers is really too disturbing imo -- Gzzz 22:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support widely QI, I see no real issues here --Christian Ferrer 12:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Christian Ferrer 17:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Votivkirche (Обетная церковь).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Votivkirche, Обетная церковь.
    Max A. Khlopov 12:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)At first, it need an accurate description --Christian Ferrer 06:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Not done --Mattbuck 20:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC)  Done--Max 20:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)   Support QI for me this perspective have something pleasant IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Too tilted (see note). Perspective distortion--Lmbuga 14:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Christian Ferrer 08:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Reus-slogan-1409.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Independence slogan in Reus, Catalonia. --PereslavlFoto 21:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review   Comment Please check the image. IMO it needs perspective correction.--XRay 17:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    *  Support Not an architectural photo, so perspective issue not disturbing. --Smial 11:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    It's a photo of a building, that makes it architectural. Perspective correction is something we ask of most photos, I don't see why this one would get a pass on that. --Mattbuck 19:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • This is a photo of a poster, in which the building is only incidental accessory. -- Smial 13:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 13:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective issues (and btw, this is not really an "independence" slogan, but a demand for a vote.) --Jebulon 20:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
    •   Info The flags make us think they demand a vote against independence? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
      • 🇪🇸--Jebulon 21:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
      • PereslavlFoto : the flags her are the catalan ones, not the spanish ones ! –– Gzzz 21:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
        • I think PereslavlFoto's question is a bit ironical, as is my answer...--Jebulon 00:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective distorsion... --Gzzz 21:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Christian Ferrer 08:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)