Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 15 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Gorilla_gorilla_gorilla_(Gorille_des_plaines_de_l'Ouest)_-_458.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Gorilla gorilla gorilla (Western lowland gorilla) male au ZooParc de Beauval à Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. --Medium69 10:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   SupportGood quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not good enough for a zoo image. Grass in the way. Charlesjsharp 18:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice composition, sharp, good lighting. --Smial 12:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support for me, too --Rolf H. 12:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 07:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Seckau_Tremmelberg_O-Panorama_01.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Panoramic view over the Mur valley to the east from Tremmelberg mountain near Seckau, Styria --Uoaei1 05:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree - there is nothing sharp in this panorama. Also, I am a little bit concerned how it is possible to assess four images - whereas two are large stitched panoramas - can be carefully assessed in less than 9 minutes. --Cccefalon 11:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Serious lack of sharpness. --Iifar 15:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Everything is unsharp (failed focus?) -- Alvesgaspar 11:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 07:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ljungdalens_gammelgård_October_2015_01.jpg edit

 

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 22:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia_de_Santa_María_la_Real,_Olite,_Navarra,_España,_2015-01-06,_DD_15-17_HDR.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Church of Santa María la Real, Olite, Navarre, Spain --Poco a poco 00:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC) -- I disagree (again).
  •   Oppose Too imposing distortion and too tight crop. Alvesgaspar 15:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cccefalon 04:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Alvesgaspar, + some cyan cast IMO.--Jebulon 10:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sharpness, resolution, microcontrast are all at "superb" level. Unfortunately, the image has 2 significant flaws: (1) perspective over-corrected (2) White balance too cold (blue tint). Both are fixable. (Notice to Hubertl: In case the issues I mentioned are fixed, you may automatically count my vote as a   Support, in case I have no time to come back here the next days. Thank you.) --Hendric Stattmann 16:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose dark --Verde78 10:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 07:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Convento_de_San_Francisco,_Cambados,_Pontevedra,_España,_2015-09-23,_DD_25.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination St Franciscus convent, Cambados, Pontevedra, Galicia (Spain) --Poco a poco 19:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Laitche 20:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Image tilted clockwise -- Alvesgaspar 15:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
  New version it is a luxus to know that all my pictures are reviewed by -at least- 2 people :) Poco a poco 22:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks ok now -- Alvesgaspar 09:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sorry, but cars at the left are the unnaturally low. Perspective could be more correct IMO. --SKas 10:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Agree, I recommend to stretch the picture vertically by about 10 %. Then you'll have a round tower clock and an overall more realistic look IMHO. --Tsungam 08:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Completely messed perspective, please compare to older photos provided by Lmbuga, which look much more realistic. -- Smial 12:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per...Lmbuga !!--Jebulon 20:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 07:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment This is not a collection of voices, but a review. Please enter a meaningful reason for your vote, thx. -- Smial 09:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 07:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ciconia_ciconia_(Cigogne_blanche)_-_464.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ciconia ciconia (white stork) in the spectacle of birds in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. --Medium69 11:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 10:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Not the best bird shot in WC, but IMO the QI criteria are just met. Hendric Stattmann 16:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Christian Ferrer 17:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--Jebulon 20:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 07:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Saueruecht_towards_Grundhof.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sure valley 01, where the Sure forms the frontier between Luxembourg (right) and Germany (left). --Cayambe 14:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The branches in the right foreground kind of disturb the harmony for me. --Clemens Stockner 18:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
    *:   Comment There was no way to avoid this tree branch. --Cayambe 19:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree. Contrast ad detail are also on the poor side. Alvesgaspar 13:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I would suggest to redo the picture at a different day, at a different time. My guess is that this one was shot mid-day with quite a bit of haze.Hendric Stattmann 16:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Blueish cast should carefully (very small amount) be reduced. -- Smial 11:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  Info Thank you Smial for the hint. I have uploaded a new version with a reduced bluish cast, mainly (but not exclusively so) in the distant background. --Cayambe 17:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  Comment Good work, thx. -- Smial 23:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 22:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ciconia_ciconia_(Cigogne_blanche)_-_403.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ciconia ciconia (white stork) in the spectacle of birds in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. --Medium69 23:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ajepbah 23:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Insufficient detail, poor composition - needs to be cropped, but file size would then be too small. Charlesjsharp 11:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I like the composition. Detail is as good as possible given the size of the subject in the photo. Alvesgaspar 13:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As per Charlesjsharp.--Hendric Stattmann 19:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment 1 MB enough for QI??? I think at least 2 MB? --Jean11 (talk) 18:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Jean11, you probably mix up Megabyte and Megapixel, right? --Cccefalon 15:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Cccefalon, right, thanks. 2.383 Pixel × 1.589 Pixel=3.786.587 Pixel, possible reduction to a minimum of approximately 1740 * 1160 = 2.018.400 Pixel, Medium69. --Jean11 (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I could actually reduce the image, but I like it with this framing. --Medium69 12:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support With Alvesgaspar. I think the compo is good and I like the delicate cloud.--Jebulon 20:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support, somewhat low detail, but very nice composition, lighting, and colours. --Smial 09:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 07:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)