Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 24 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Southernmost point buoy, NE view.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Southernmost point in the continental USA --Radomianin 11:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very noisy sky. --A.Savin 12:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
      Support Okay now. --A.Savin 01:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The sky looks natural to me, I like that.--Kritzolina 06:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I'd suggest slightly appling some noise reduction to the sky. --Augustgeyler 11:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Parts of the upper left and center sky in particular are a little too noisy, IMO, but the problem is probably fixable with just a little smoothing. It's close to a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 11:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thanks for comments and suggestions. This weekend I will improve the sky section.--Radomianin (talk) 14:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I have reduced the noise in the sky area and just uploaded the new version. Thanks in advance for your opinions. --Radomianin (talk) 23:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Not perfect but good. --Augustgeyler 08:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, good enough now. -- Ikan Kekek 09:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 13:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Museo_di_Santa_Giulia_chiostro_settentrionale_Brescia.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The northern cloister in the Museo di Santa Giulia. --Moroder 09:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose The composition and perspective are good, unfortunately the sun shines over the building on the left. Sky is a bit too bright, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 16:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I disagree. I was not able to reduce the sunshine (maybe God can do it) --Moroder 21:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Enough quality for a QI --Michielverbeek 06:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support It clearly is a QI to me--Tesla Delacroix 13:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 16:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Well composed but non-optimal lighting situation. --Augustgeyler 17:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The shady parts have been lightened a bit too much for my taste, but the low lens flare doesn't really bother me and overall the quality is more than sufficient. --Smial 13:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral With regard to the difficult light situation, the result is imho very good and reaches QI bar. But there are two dust spots and one sensor hot pixel (see image notes) @Moroder: Idea for further improvement: The problem with such shadow/non-shadow photos is that the shadow parts are often to bluish. With such photo are usually make moderate local adjustments on the white balance of the shadow parts (warmer). On this photo (File:Klemensviertel-Kreuzberg-5-2020.jpg) I used this technique for the shadow parts. Otherwise the foreground stays very blueish. --Tuxyso 08:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Done @Tuxyso: Welcome back, thanks for the notes and the suggestion which makes sense to me but unfortunately I don't know how to selectively change WB on Lightroom CC --Moroder 16:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 13:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)