Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 25 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Tallinn_Landmarks_94.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Tower of St John's Church in Freedom Square, Tallinn Scotch Mist 07:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality --Llez 07:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Looks distorted. Scotch Mist, let me know if you're going to work on that. If I don't hear from you and nothing changes, I'll move this to CR within 2 days. -- Ikan Kekek 09:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Ikan Kekek Am not sure what you mean by "distorted" as this was a straightforward photo with natural perspective that has not been altered or processed (rotation only) as adjusting to verticals would IMHO have rendered an 'unrealistic' building - perhaps there is a specific detail you wish me to address? --Scotch Mist 15:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Thanks for your reply. I'm going to move this to discussion. The tower leaning up to the right and the part of the church to its right leaning left look too strange to me. Let's see what other people think. -- Ikan Kekek 20:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective correction is alway an artifact but it is requested: dura lex sed lex --Moroder 02:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Ikan Kekek: @Moroder:   Done Have uploaded image adjusted for 'true verticals' for your further review - am not sure this makes for a 'better quality image' overall but can revert if necessary? --Scotch Mist 08:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Much better. I hope you won't be too annoyed if I now ask you to decrease the noise in the sky. I didn't notice it much as long as I was too distracted by the shape of the church. -- Ikan Kekek 09:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Ikan Kekek: Unfortunately more apparent 'noise' can be a 'side-effect' of perspective correction and one of the reasons I generally prefer not to be 'processing' images if this can be avoided - do you think the 'noise' in the sky is sufficiently significant for you not to support promotion? --Scotch Mist 09:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment At least 50/50 on that. Is it possible to smooth it out a bit? -- Ikan Kekek 10:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek:   Done --Scotch Mist 11:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too tight crop below and some parts of the image too dark due to unfortunate lighting -- Spurzem 11:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Moroder 18:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support now. -- Ikan Kekek 21:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Since I am alone with my criticism, I withdraw my contra. Apparently vertical lines and good sharpness are sufficient for QI. -- Spurzem 22:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)