Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 08 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Würzburg,_Residenzplatz_2_20170422_003_bearbeitet.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Die Würzburger Residenz. Ich war einige Male dort, aber nie gab es einen leeren Parkplatz davor. --Nightflyer 20:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose IMO photo needs a vertical perspective improvement at both sides (especially the right part) --Michielverbeek 20:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks o.k.--Ermell 15:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --W.carter 20:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2017_-_St._George's_church,_Sighnaghi.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination St. George's church, Sighnaghi --Moahim 06:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Aeou 07:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Needs better categories (and a larger version would be appreciated). --C messier 10:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done --Moahim 05:31, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK now. A village category would be helpfull too. --C messier 10:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - The steeple is not very sharp, but overall, I think this photo is good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --W.carter 20:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

File:TomadeAgua-RiodeLaPlata-0038.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Water intake of Obras Sanitarias in Rio de La Plata --Ezarate 11:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment The horizon is tilted, please correct. I think that the image would get better if you toned up the shadows and toned down the highlights in some way. --Basotxerri 16:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done Ezarate 18:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but you've left the crop marks after rotating the image, please correct the borders. --Basotxerri 20:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done thanks!! Ezarate 20:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry for disagreeing, but there's still a white wedge at the bottom and the building is darker than before. --Tsungam 07:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
  • @Tsungam: Have you refreshed your image cache? I can't see any wedge anymore. --Basotxerri 07:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Of course, but Ezarate did another edit meanwhile. --Tsungam 09:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
  Oppose Sorry, horizon is still tilted 0.4° ccw. --Milseburg 10:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
@Milseburg:   Done --Ezarate 11:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Tilt is ok now. But don´t forget to correct the edges after rotating. --Milseburg 21:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Ok now. --Milseburg 14:45, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --W.carter 20:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)