Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 10 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Oberstinkenbrunn_Kellergasse_Kirchberg_20.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Kirchberg" in Oberstinkenbrunn (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:07, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The strong sensor pattern should be removed. --Ermell 06:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ermell. Look at the door. -- Ikan Kekek 05:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yep, another one of the ruined images because of the broken equipment.--Peulle 10:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Oberstinkenbrunn_Kellergasse_Kirchberg_19.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Kirchberg" in Oberstinkenbrunn (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:07, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Moroder 04:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The strong sensor pattern should be removed. --Ermell 06:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek 05:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Traben-Trarbach,_Hotel_Bellevue_BW_2019-06-23_15-04-22.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Traben-Trarbach, Hotel Bellevue, Aacher Straße 1 --Berthold Werner 08:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Looks a bit overexposed to me. --Steindy 10:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)  Done I tried to get it darker. --Berthold Werner 18:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
    Now everything seems gray. The roof of the hotel is sufficient. --Steindy 18:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
    Es gelingt halt nicht jedes Foto. --Berthold Werner 08:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
      OpposeI don't like it. Withdrawn or other votes? --Steindy 10:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
      Supportgood quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 08:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
      Neutral IMO the hotel looks very nice, but the sky not. Can you make three blue parts (see note) more white? --Michielverbeek 20:42, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Moroder 05:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Château_-_intérieur_-_salle_du_Conseil_(Amboise)_(1).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Council chamber of Amboise castle (Indre-et-Loire, France). --Gzen92 10:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough. --Streetdeck 09:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
    I disagree. The photo is sharp enough. However, the dark area should be brightened up a bit. --Steindy 11:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - QI to me. I don't care about the black area. -- Ikan Kekek 05:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Quality high enough foir QI --Michielverbeek 07:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell 07:34, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tournasol7 07:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 10:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Seitenansicht_des_hinteren_Bereichs_des_JCRG_Hof_20190915_624.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Side view of a back of a high school in Bavaria. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality--Armenak Margarian 20:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. Please make the verticals vertical first --Podzemnik 23:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

  Done Thanks for the review, I corrected the issue. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

  •   Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 22:18, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Le_Cendrillon_Alexis_de_Portneuf.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Le Cendrillon cheese from Alexis de Portneuf cheese factory, Quebec --Cephas 21:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
There is a lens spot. Does the photo not have too little depth of field? --Steindy 22:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Done --Cephas 15:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Dust spot removed. Good quality. --D-Kuru 10:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I disagree. The lack of depth of field is disturbing. The cut is sharp but the rest of the piece is not. It detracts from the image. --GRDN711 21:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Steindy: Your vote? --D-Kuru 21:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support The cut surface is sharp, but more depth of field would not hurt the photo, but okay with me. --Steindy 00:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Low DOF. -- Smial 07:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - IMO, the low DoF is OK, as a sufficient part of the cheese is shown in focus to represent the whole piece. -- Ikan Kekek 05:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Still acceptable to me -- DerFussi 08:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 06:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

File:JCRG_Hof_Vorplatz_vor_Haupteingang_20190915_195.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Area near the main entrance of a high school in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    A little vertical correction on the right side needed. --Manfred Kuzel 16:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
      Done Thanks for the review, new version uploaded. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
    Answer: I'm sorry, but the bracing of the grid in the foreground and the flagpoles in the middle are still tilting to the right. --Manfred Kuzel 08:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Sorry, not done. Both sides are leaning. --Steindy 19:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
      Comment: Und warum gibt man dem User keine Chance, die Perspektive zu korrigieren, ehe man ihn mit einem “Decline” abschmettert? --Manfred Kuzel 03:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
      Info Sorry, but I think that I'm not able to fix the issue. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
    @PantheraLeo1359531: I've make it for you, O.K.? --Manfred Kuzel 17:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 17:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   CommentThat didn't work. The file is now too small now.--Ermell 07:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Indeed, way too small and ineligible for consideration for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle 10:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Banská_Bystrica_-_Námestie_SNP_006.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Banská Bystrica, Námestie SNP --Milan Bališin 18:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Correction of the perspective necessary. --Steindy 23:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
    •   Comment The tower in reality is actually leaning, not a straight structure. --Milan Bališin 05:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
      •   Comment The tower is really leaning, but the buildings on the left and right side are slightly leaning in, too. Some perspective correction and the picture is ok. --Imehling 08:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
        •   Done --Milan Bališin 15:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
          •   Support Yes, that's better. --Imehling 07:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Okay now. --Steindy (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 06:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)