Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 11 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Grieser_Pfarrkirche_Süd_Bozen_Südtirol.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Old Parish Church in Gries Bozen Bolzano (south view). --Moroder 09:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    Hmmm... Not really sharp. From Moroder we know better quality. --Steindy 10:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)  Comment @Steindy: You are charming :-) but I guess photos have to be evaluated according to an objective and general standard and not to an individual level --Moroder 10:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
      Comment This was intended as a hint, the image sharpness slightly increase. That should not be a problem with Photoshop. May another user decide. --Steindy 13:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I don't mind the sharpness, but the colours and the composition do not convince me. --Kallerna 09:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose How I said. --Steindy 19:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
    I disagree Don't see any problems with colours, composition or sharpness --Moroder 15:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough regarding the high resolution. --Smial 07:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 17:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me.--Ermell 07:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Is the steeple not overexposed? Or is it just my monitor? Does anyone else see this? The white balance seems off to me, too - too yellow. I am provisionally opposing to ensure discussion and reserve the right to cross out this vote for good cause. -- Ikan Kekek 04:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
      Comment It's not, you can see the full texture of it and even the gilded globe on top does not have the always overexposed spot (the sky was cast) --Moroder 06:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Yes, I do see the globe, but I see only a bit of the texture on what we could call the shaft of the steeple. It really looks overexposed to me. If others tell me it doesn't look that way on their monitors, I may cross out this vote. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Grub_Kellergasse_Berggasse_18.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Objekt in der Kellergasse „Berggasse" in Grub (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Desc only in german, what is the image about? Problematic composition. --Kallerna 09:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
    • Answer: Thanks for the comment. The photo shows an object in the cellar lane "Berggasse" in Grub (Lower Austria) and should document that in some of the mostly lonely cellar lanes still individual wine cellars are used. And why the contra? --Manfred Kuzel 16:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  • In the right door you have strong sensor pattern. --Steindy 22:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   CommentDas ist die unverputzte Ziegelwand an der Rückseite des Preßhauses! --Manfred Kuzel 04:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose tilted (see the blue pillars on the left) -- DerFussi 13:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
  • The "blue pillars" are water barrels standing on uneven ground, DerFussi. --Manfred Kuzel 03:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
    • @Manfred Kuzel: . I did not talk about the water barrels on the right. Look behind the car. I talked about the left side and you will find some blue (not vertical) pillars. -- DerFussi 11:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support QI in meinen Augen--Ralf Roletschek 20:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sensor flaws in the doorway. This camera may be on its last legs.--Peulle 09:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Answer: @DerFussi: Thanks for Review, new version uploaded. @Peulle: The sensor flaws in the doorway is the bare brick wall at the back of the press house! --Manfred Kuzel 16:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Ah all right then. :) --Peulle 12:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blue water barrels, tree branches, a non-descript house, a satellite dish and a car – IMO the image elements are troubling and lack focus. --GRDN711 18:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Answer: Since the many cellar alleys leave and the individual objects are unused and partially decayed, a vehicle, a satallite dish and blue rain barrels are a sign that there are still individual used objects. --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)