Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 17 2016

Consensual review edit

File:2013-04-21 Heinrich-Brüning-Straße 16, Bonn IMG 0121.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Villa in Bonn, Germany (by Hasenläufer).--Leit 17:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Sky over exposed. --Satdeep Gill 02:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree... --Bijay chaurasia 03:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, the sky is blown and posterized big-time. -- Ikan Kekek 03:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Trying several options of improvement (highlights, exposure, graduation curve, ...) I reached limits. At this day the sky was completely milky, without any structure/texture. Please check my latest upload. ..Hasenläufer 07:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  • That's a big improvement. I noticed a really small gray dust spot above the furthest right tree branches above the house. I guess it was invisible before. Please remove that, but I'll vote to   Support now. -- Ikan Kekek 07:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the hint! Unfortunately, up to now I wasn't able to detect the small gray dust spot area. Please, would you be so kind to mark it by a note? ..Hasenläufer 09:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, I tried. But the dust spot isn't visible except at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 10:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for providing a note, marking the position of the dust spot. Now it's removed. --Hasenläufer 18:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 16:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Kaffeebörse (Hamburg-HafenCity).Börsensaal.Leuchten.2.12424.ajb.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ceiling light in former coffee exchange in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 07:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   OpposeInsufficient quality: unsharp and too noisy. Why set the ISO so high, btw? --Peulle 11:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
      Comment @Peulle: Thanks for review. ISO was set so high because the image was made free-hand, indoor and overhead with low light ;-) It shows this subject, so it has IMO a small DOF and not necessary a lack of sharpness - maybe a consensual review? --Ajepbah 18:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment By all means, let me fix that for you (changed "Decline" to "Discuss" per request of the nominator). And yes, such indoor shots are difficult; I have several hundred museum shots and only a few of them are good enough for QI. --Peulle 07:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Not clear enough at full size for me, though it's probably close. We'll see what other people think. -- Ikan Kekek 05:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 14:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Thyna008.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Grands thermes publics, site archéologique de Thyna, Sfax --El Golli Mohamed 10:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Unsharp --Kroton 10:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support not sharp but not really unsharp too, at the limit IMO --Christian Ferrer 14:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Christian Ferrer. --Basotxerri 20:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sharpness is ok but the dust spot on the left side should be removed--Ermell 12:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Done Dust spot removed thanks --El Golli Mohamed 18:00, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 14:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:BMW car.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination BMW Car at vintage cars exhibition in Sokolniki in Moscow --AlixSaz 18:08, 8 October 2016(UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, license plate manipulated. --Ralf Roletschek 19:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support License plates may be blanked for privacy reasons. W.carter 20:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment I seem to remember a discussion about that earlier, but I can't remember if any conclusions were reached. Could somebody remind me? --Peulle 18:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  • (Who are you? Missing signature.) W.carter 12:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Anyway, found two discussions about this: this and this. W.carter 12:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll have a look. :)--Peulle 18:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Another very much more recent discussion is here. My view is that number plates should generally be courtesy blanked primarily for anti-cloning reasons (privacy being a secondary concern). However, as I had a QI nomination opposed because its number plate was blanked, I compromised and disguised the plate instead, which was generally supported. DeFacto 20:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Good to know. Thanks for sharing. W.carter 21:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Overall good quality. --Dirtsc 08:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't like the white license plate, the overexposed trophaes on the car and the foreign wheels. -- Spurzem 12:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me --A.Savin 15:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - The glary windows and trophies bother me too much for me to consider this a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment The photo was posted by me without the consent of the vehicle owner and I wiped the courtesy of the license plate, but if this is so important it can be restored. --AlixSaz 22:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Es hat zwar nichts direkt mit der Qualität der Aufnahme zu tun, aber mich stört es auch, dass das Auto total verhunzt ist. Da scheint fast nichts original zu sein. Ich hätte den Wagen wahrscheinlich nicht fotografiert, allenfalls als Beispiel, wie man einen Oldtimer verunstalten kann. -- Spurzem 13:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
blanked or not blanked license plates is not a reason for oppose. Ralf and Spurzem always oppose for that reason since years, this is a principle for them. Good to know, I think. Ralf always disagrees with perspective correction as well.--Jebulon 20:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The picture as such may be acceptable and I don't bother about the licence plate either. But I fully agree with Spurzem: It hurts to see how that beautiful BMW 321 has been spoiled. I wouldn't have honoured that disaster by taking any picture of it. --Palauenc05 22:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 16:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)