Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 30 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Patrulla_Aguila,_ILA_2018,_Schönefeld_(1X7A6633).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Aerobatic display of Patrulla Águila at ILA 2018 --MB-one 12:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Random crop. --Kallerna 12:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support technically well done, the crop stresses the dynamic situation imho --Virtual-Pano 21:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 11:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Some motion blur, but regarding the resolution still acceptable. -- Smial 13:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 16:36, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Goéland_argenté_(Larus_argentatus)_(36).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Herring gull (Larus argentatus) in Île-de-Sein (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 08:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very similar to 37 (!), but with distracting crop on top. Why promote both? --Kallerna 11:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment firstly, similars are allowed by the rules, QI is not a FP. Secondly, images 36 and 37 have several differences (see leg position and head rotation). But agreed, a little cropping on top (without dark areas) would be better --George Chernilevsky 11:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Then we should change the rules, definitely there is no point promoting duplicates. --Kallerna 12:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support From taxonomic point of view, its important to show differents aspects of the animal. This picture show leg and foot structures differents from the other picture. --Jani Pereira 19:07, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Per every supporting vote --Trougnouf 22:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment With George Chernilevsky, it should be cropped a little on top. --Augustgeyler (talk) 06:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your comments, I cut top of picture. Gzen92 07:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per others, and Kallerna, a nomination response thread is not a place to propose new guidelines. Start a thread in the appropriate talk page. -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Augustgeyler 15:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 16:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Iphofen_St.Veit_Altar-20201018-RM-155051.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Side altar in the catholic city parish church St.Veit in Iphofen --Ermell 06:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Clear composition. But the image is cropped too tight at the top and over all not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 09:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support The crop at the top indeed is very tight. But the main part of the image is good. -- Spurzem 11:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Praha_Mala_Strana_U_Sovovych_mlynu_4_Lichtenstejnsky_palac_a.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Column capital at Liechtenstein Palace, Prague, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 10:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Too soft, level of detail too low. --Augustgeyler 08:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Info It may look soft because it's an old capital that has endured a lot of weathering, cleaning, possibly repair. I don't think it lacks sharpness/detail - just look at the crack on the right; on top and bottom you can almost see single grains of the sandstone. --JiriMatejicek 16:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I double checked it. Keeping the object in mind I still think, there is too less detail captured. Did you engage noise reduction? --Augustgeyler (talk) 05:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • No. Not experienced enough with post-processing and didn't see a need. --JiriMatejicek 15:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment So you did not take it as a raw but as jpeg? Than your camera applied a too visible noise reduction, which reduced the level of detail. --Augustgeyler 10:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sharp enough for QI. --Palauenc05 22:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support +1. --Peulle 07:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support +2. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 10:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 11:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support +4.5. ;-P --Smial 13:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 16:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Mayan_skull_front_p2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Real size resin skull, Chiapas Mexico, Image produced by combining 3 pictures: --Cvmontuy 14:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Nice --Wilfredor 14:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Compared to the other nominated image, I think the white balance is off. Look at the non white / gray background. --Augustgeyler 10:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I have reprocesed the image please review again --Cvmontuy 19:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Well done! --Augustgeyler 21:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Brussels_Central_station_world_wars_memorial_(DSC_0318).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Brussels Central station world wars memorial --Trougnouf 06:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose You'd improve your picture substantially cropping the bottom of the lower level --Poco a poco 18:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I like it. To me it shows life and people are moving places after we've gone through these attrocities. Hopefully in the right direction, even though the artwork is largely ignored. Is that crop a factor for QI ? --Trougnouf 19:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment To me that area is just disturbing and not adding anything to the image, as it is jus to small to me to consider it a essential element in the composition. Other opinions? --Poco a poco 18:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I am with Poco. The lower part might make sense, if there would have been more of the sub-scenery shown. But in that case it is so small that I'd cropp it out, too. --Augustgeyler 19:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support It's true that could have been a little wider, but that small background area makes makes it easier to understand the context in which the artwork is placed. I have tried to crop it on my pc and it looks good, of course, but the uncropped version makes more sense to me. Generally speaking, it's well composed and the quality is good for me. --Lion-hearted85 10:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. I agree with the others, but I respect the artist's motivations and artistic license. -- Ikan Kekek 07:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support with or without (the crop) - excellent focus and exposure --Virtual-Pano 20:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose It is not an easy decision. But I think the suffering composition weighs more than the idea of showing the context. Therefore we should see more of the other floor. --Augustgeyler 06:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Maison_à_Locronan.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination House in Locronan (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose blown sky --Kallerna 17:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks like the sky of a cloudy day to me. Please discuss. --Lion-hearted85 09:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ok for me.--Ermell 10:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Rainy day, see other photos. Gzen92 07:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support OK. --Aristeas 09:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Maison_de_marchand.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Merchant's house in Locronan (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose blown sky --Kallerna 17:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks like the sky of a cloudy day to me. Please discuss. --Lion-hearted85 09:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The sky is ok.--Ermell 10:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sky is perhaps just slightly overexposed, and it looks like there's a bit of magenta CA on the left side of the chimney. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Rainy day, see other photos. Gzen92 07:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support OK. --Aristeas 09:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)