Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Fallen_Diplomats_Memorial_Ottawa.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Memorial to the fallen diplomats in Ottawa near Island Park Drive --MB-one 21:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 14:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Disagree, too soft due to f29, it almost looks as out of focus. Don't use so narrow apertures, to avoid diffraction. You don't need to go beyond f11 to have a large depth of field, I myself seldom go beyond f8. It's a pity, because composition and motif are nice. --Kadellar 14:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Kadellar, and blown whites. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 17:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per others.--Jebulon 16:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 16:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Mozhaysky_Bridge_SPB_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mozhaysky Bridge in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Noise at the bridge and distortion on th sides. ----MB-one 01:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
    • I disagree. Noise is correctable issue, distortions are consequence of using wide-angle lens. --Florstein 16:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Christian Ferrer 10:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good images. --ArildV 14:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support OK to me. --A.Savin 18:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good. (Bridge and reflection within the frame might have made an FPC.) --Kreuzschnabel 05:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 16:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)