Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 13 2016
-
- Nomination Location, Lendevallei in Netherlands. Trek through the valley (Blesbroggeschaans).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Nice! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Location, Lendevallei in Netherlands. Trek through the valley (Blesbroggeschaans).
-
- Nomination Eastern view at the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wrought iron gate at the subconstruction of the staircase of the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief of coats of arms of the archbishop Leonhard von Keutschach at the portal`s overdoor of castle Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mummelgrummel 03:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Münster Basilica, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 00:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jewish Cemetery, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 00:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frayed fishing net flags. --W.carter 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ouergha River in Taounate, Morocco. By User:Fouassi --Reda benkhadra 22:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, too shallow DoF so too unsharp and bad contrast, the lens of a cell phone generally doesn't take QI --Ezarate 22:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque figures (13th Century) at the outside of the apsis of the parish Church Schöngrabern, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 22:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 22:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 22:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 22:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic parish church Saints Philipp and James the Greater, Zellerndorf, Weinviertel, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 22:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trail blaze on the Green Ring of Vitoria. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Overgrown habitat in mild evening light. Location, nature Delleboersterheide - Cats Poele, in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 15:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Overgrown habitat in mild evening light. Location, nature Delleboersterheide - Cats Poele, in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Fuchsia 'Albertina'.
--Famberhorst 15:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Fuchsia 'Albertina'.
-
- Nomination Beautiful birch (Betula) in the mild evening light. Location, nature Delleboersterheide - Cats Poele, in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 15:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Beautiful birch (Betula) in the mild evening light. Location, nature Delleboersterheide - Cats Poele, in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination 18 Market Square in Rzeszów --Kroton 15:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 19 Market Square in Rzeszów --Kroton 15:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 24 Market Square in Rzeszów --Kroton 15:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 25 Market Square in Rzeszów --Kroton 15:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:11, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to Kazimierz Górski --Kroton 15:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great black-backed gull (Larus marinus). Taken in Christchurch, New Zealand --Podzemnik 12:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great black-backed gull (Larus marinus). Taken in Christchurch, New Zealand --Podzemnik 12:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vegetation with predominating Spanish juniper in the Botanical Garden of Olarizu. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 12:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 12:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drinking fountain and benches in Mendiola. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 11:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museumhaven, Leeuwarden. --C messier 11:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination De Bijenkorf, Amsterdam. --C messier 11:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fryske Akademy, Leeuwarden. --C messier 11:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Could you apply some NR in the sky, please? --Basotxerri 11:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Done --C messier 11:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Much better, thank you! --Basotxerri 11:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oude Boteringestraat, Groningen. --C messier 11:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archive of the of the History of the province of Álava (Archivo Histórico Provincial de Álava). Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 10:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK. --C messier 11:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La Graciosa, one of the Canary Islands (Spain) in the Atlantic Ocean, from Mirador del Rio viewpoint. --ElBute 09:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grenadersky Brdge in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 09:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination English Embankment Pierce in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 09:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buddhist temple Datsan Gunzechoinei in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 09:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spain, Granada, Generalife --Berthold Werner 08:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Could be brighter but anyhow QI to me --Poco a poco 13:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spain, Granada, Generalife view to the Alhambra --Berthold Werner 08:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ElBute 10:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fort Wysoka Skała in Srebrna Góra 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fort Wysoka Skała in Srebrna Góra 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fort Wysoka Skała in Srebrna Góra 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fort Wysoka Skała in Srebrna Góra 4 --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fort Wysoka Skała in Srebrna Góra 5 --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vezio castle, Varenna, Italy --Poco a poco 07:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Not the sharpnest around, but OK for me. --C messier 12:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New Church, Amsterdam, Netherlands --Poco a poco 07:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kretzulescu Church, Bucharest, Romania --Poco a poco 07:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Nicholas church, Amsterdam, Netherlands --Poco a poco 07:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination CEC Palace, Bucharest, Romania --Poco a poco 07:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 24 Kotliarevskoho Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 05:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 24 Kotliarevskoho Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 05:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4 Serbska Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 05:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Location, Lendevallei in Netherlands. Trek through the valley (Poldermolen ‘De Gooijer’).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. Did you tried 2:1? --XRay 04:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Do you mean a standing image?--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Proportions, 2 thirds left, 1 third right. On the right is no information. --XRay 05:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Location, Lendevallei in Netherlands. Trek through the valley (Poldermolen ‘De Gooijer’).
-
- Nomination Watermill Schulze Westerath in the hamlet Stevern, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
(With improvements now, the first version was too dark. Sorry. --XRay 11:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Watermill Schulze Westerath in the hamlet Stevern, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Stephen's Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kakesbeck Castle in the hamlet Bechtrup in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New Town Synagogue in Rzeszów --Kroton 19:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Please check the image. It's leaning in at the right. --XRay 04:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Kroton 15:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Support Thanks. IMO OK now. --XRay 16:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exterior of the Church of the Saint Andrew in Cordoba, Spain. --ElBute 16:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Good but both sides are leaning out Poco a poco 16:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Done --ElBute 07:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moskauer Vorort in Riga, Lettland --Ralf Roletschek 07:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moskauer Vorort in Riga, Lettland --Ralf Roletschek 07:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The ferry Stångskär arriving in Landsort, Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 07:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Comment
Few CAs to remove.--Ermell 12:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you for reviews, new version uploaded.--ArildV 21:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC) And now Ermell?--ArildV 06:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Perfect. --Ermell 19:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination The ferry Stångskär arriving in Landsort, Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 07:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Comment
-
- Nomination Doorkijkje. Location, nature Delleboersterheide - Cats Poele, in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 05:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 22:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Doorkijkje. Location, nature Delleboersterheide - Cats Poele, in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination OS Grid Ref: SH839062 Late medieval church heavily restored in the nineteenth century, the interior was altered in 1902. However the roof dates from the fifteenth century and the porch is dated 1742. Coflein:http://www.coflein.gov.uk/en/site/400342/details/ST+TYDECHO%27S+CHURCH%2C+CEMMAES/ --Llywelyn2000 05:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Apart from the unfortunate light, there is a big lens flare (?) to the left. --C messier 11:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Ust and St Dyfrig, Llanwrin, Powys, Cymru Wales --Llywelyn2000 13:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Posterised sky with overexposure, too many black shadows, CAs and probably upsized (which makes its problems worse). Fixable? --C messier 12:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Not done --C messier 11:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Ust and St Dyfrig, Llanwrin, Powys, Cymru Wales --Llywelyn2000 13:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Posterised sky with overexposure, too many black shadows, and some CAs. Fixable? --C messier 12:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Not done --C messier 11:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: image sur les hauteurs du parc fagia --Imed skander 10:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Needs better file name and description. W.carter 11:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: image sur les hauteurs du parc fagia --Imed skander 10:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Marches du capitole de Thuburbo Majus. By User:Kasparov tounsi --Touzrimounir 15:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Needs perspective correction. Daniel Case 02:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Marches du capitole de Thuburbo Majus. By User:Kasparov tounsi --Touzrimounir 15:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountains in Bonn --AKirch-Bonn 14:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline There is some CA (see water of both side fountains) but the crop is not at QI level to me. Both, on the left and on the right, you have cropped out the fountains, not a QI to me like this Can you irmpove it? Poco a poco 17:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello Poco a poco, unfortunately this is not possible. Sorry. --AKirch-Bonn 16:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done within a week. --XRay 04:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountains in Bonn --AKirch-Bonn 13:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment CA has to be removed and the perspective corrected--Ermell 19:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
New version uploaded --AKirch-Bonn 16:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment The image is leaning in. --XRay 04:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
New version uploaded--AKirch-Bonn 15:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Weak Support Acceptable, but it'S leaning out on the left now. A little bit. It would be nice if you check your image again. --XRay 16:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Amphithéâtre_d'ElJem_2.jpg edit
- Nomination El Jem Roman Amphitheater --IssamBarhoumi 09:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment There is CA and both sides are leaning out Poco a poco 10:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Sorry, too strong chromatic aberration --Berthold Werner 10:48, 9 September 2016 (UTC)- Support good now. --Berthold Werner 08:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment dear Poco a poco and dear Berthold Werner i removed the CA and the leaning out see it again --IssamBarhoumi 11:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support QI to me. I don't understand why something easily fixable (like CA) could guide to a direct Decline, we shouldn't overload CR --Poco a poco 14:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Poco a poco. --Basotxerri 07:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --W.carter 08:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, IMHO. --C messier 11:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 05:21, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
File:ETR 500 Frecciarossa at platform in Milano Centrale.jpg edit
- Nomination Tighter view of ETR 500 Italian high-speed train at Milano Centrale --Daniel Case 17:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Burnt highlights and a lot CA --Ermell 14:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Burnt highlights and a lot CA, as Ermell--Lmbuga 15:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose CAs are fixable, but the "light at the end of the tunnel" is not, unfortunately. W.carter 08:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 03:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 02:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Décord_star_wars.jpg edit
- Nomination decord star wars au niveaux nafta, ong jmal --Imed skander 10:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Needs better file name and description. W.carter 11:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, but jpg artifacts: See the sky, please--Lmbuga 16:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Do you think you could fix the things pointed out in the comments? W.carter 17:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Jpeg artifacts are due to the compresion: 5,184 × 3,456 pixels and file size only 1.12 MB. Less compression is better, but if the review of this picture is with only 2 megapixels... Other users can think: "discuss"--Lmbuga 15:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Nobody had done either 'Decline' or 'Promote' so you took it directly from 'Nomination' to 'Discuss' and 'Decline'. That was a really strange thing to do. If you don't think it is QI and no one else has said anything, you should just 'Decline' it and see if someone disagrees with you. W.carter 16:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I think that with this compression is not QI, but what happens if the image is resized to two megapixels? Would be the compression important to decline? I'm not sure. What do you think, W.carter--Lmbuga 12:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think too much about "what was" or "what would happen if", I deal with the picture in front of me and make decisions only on that. As it stands now with the jpegs in the sky, it is not a QI. But this noise problem is usually very easily fixed in post-processing for an experienced photographer, so I always like to give the nominator a chance to correct things like this, which is why I did not decline it right away. Now this is a new user here, and we don't know what level his/hers skills are at. Just last week I became surprised at how fast another "newbie" grasped how to deal with everything here and how to correct their pictures. So I like to be not too fast to judge. In this case though, the categories have been corrected by another user, the description has not been improved and we have not heard from the "newbie" so I guess this will have to be a decline unless someone steps in and save the image for the nominator. Miracles do happen, even here. "Trust The Force,
LukeLmbuga!" ;) W.carter 21:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think too much about "what was" or "what would happen if", I deal with the picture in front of me and make decisions only on that. As it stands now with the jpegs in the sky, it is not a QI. But this noise problem is usually very easily fixed in post-processing for an experienced photographer, so I always like to give the nominator a chance to correct things like this, which is why I did not decline it right away. Now this is a new user here, and we don't know what level his/hers skills are at. Just last week I became surprised at how fast another "newbie" grasped how to deal with everything here and how to correct their pictures. So I like to be not too fast to judge. In this case though, the categories have been corrected by another user, the description has not been improved and we have not heard from the "newbie" so I guess this will have to be a decline unless someone steps in and save the image for the nominator. Miracles do happen, even here. "Trust The Force,
- Comment I think that with this compression is not QI, but what happens if the image is resized to two megapixels? Would be the compression important to decline? I'm not sure. What do you think, W.carter--Lmbuga 12:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose as it is now. Can be changed if the problems are fixed. W.carter 08:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 02:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Midnight sun over fields south of Inuvik, NT.jpg edit
- Nomination Midnight sun on a landscape near Inuvik --Daniel Case 05:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Pudelek 10:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Lens flares and dust spots. --C messier 12:43, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, per C messier. --Basotxerri 14:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 02:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Graphomya maculata male.jpg edit
- Nomination A fly (unidentified) --Aymen FANTAR 23:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Please mind to figure out the species of animals and plants you nominate here Poco a poco 22:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The file also needs a better name. W.carter 08:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Geotag added. --Aymen FANTAR 16:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 16:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Not really sure about this one, the top crop is not good enough, you cropped the wing --Poco a poco 18:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- I think it's not cropped but just on the limit of the frame -- Aymen FANTAR 08:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'm really 50/50 on this one; the tight top crop is a bit of a problem, as is the shallow DoF, but the colours, the light and sharpness of the eye are just brilliant ... Leaning towards a weak support for QI (it could have been FP with said issues fixed). I'd like to hear more opinions of the quality.--Peulle 22:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop/cut is unfortunate and we can't help here. There is plenty of space below; so no excuse for the cut above. Jkadavoor 08:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, QI in my opinion must have better DoF. Very unfortunate crop--Lmbuga 16:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I agree with Lmbuga entirely. -- Ikan Kekek 08:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 02:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
File:16-09-02-Wahlkampfabschluß_in_Warnemünde-RR2_4739.jpg edit
- Nomination Sigmar Gabriel, german politican --Ralf Roletschek 13:37, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I disagree: right crop cuts too far. Also slight lack of sharpness near the left side.--Peulle 15:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support I don´t see any problem with the crop. --Hubertl 09:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment believe me, Peulle, the rest of the head is just for decoration, no deeper purpose. --Hubertl 13:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, I still disagree; a portrait photo should not crop a person's ears. My oppose therefore stands. Still, democracy rules in CR. ;) --Peulle 07:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment believe me, Peulle, the rest of the head is just for decoration, no deeper purpose. --Hubertl 13:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp 21:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose No problem with the crop, but it is unsharp at full size.--Jebulon 09:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 15:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose What should be sharp (the eyes) is unsharp, and what doesn't have to be sharp (the shirt) is sharp. --A.Savin 08:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough, sorry. Poor quality IMO. Motion blur IMO--Lmbuga 16:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I'm breaking the tie in favor of the opposers. I don't think this photo is of very good quality because of the unsharpness noted above, and the crop is not acceptable to me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 02:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)