Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 23 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Didžioji_Street_at_dusk,_Vilnius,_Lithuania_-_Diliff.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Didžioji Street. By User:Diliff --Andrew J.Kurbiko 18:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Need perspecive correction --Commonists 19:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
      Question What problem are you seeing? -- Ikan Kekek 20:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --A.Savin 12:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree ......the left and right poles are not straight --Commonists 19:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    That's certainly not a reason to oppose, as poles in fact do not have to be straight, and if you look at the much more important verticals on buildings, you would see they are all straight. Regards --A.Savin 13:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Sutton_Hoo_helmet_design_2-reconstructed-known.svg edit

 

  • Nomination Reconstructed design 2, showing portions known from fragments of the design and inferred portions from the Sutton Hoo helmet. --Goran tek-en 18:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  Comment Incomplete metadata. --F. Riedelio 09:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  Comment Good to have it, but not a QI requirement, especially for an SVG file, which wouldn't have it anyway. @Rodhullandemu: 09:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
F. Riedelio Could you please explain which meta data is missing? --Goran tek-en 17:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: Please see [here]. Incomplete metadata (not EXIF data) is only a hint, not a review. --F. Riedelio 16:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
@Rodhullandemu: Could you please explain how it's not following the QI requerments? And what do you mean by "which wouldn't have it anyway."? --Goran tek-en 17:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
You can't have EXIF data on a SVG if that is what you mean F. Riedelio. --Goran tek-en 18:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good enough for me. Rodhullandemu 07:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Star_of_Anatoli_Kouznetsov_on_walk_of_Actor's_Fame_of_Vyborg.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Star of Anatoli Kouznetsov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg --Reda Kerbouche 07:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Sorry! If you take such photos, then as a photographer you should at least make the effort to remove dirt and objects from the monument. That is not a QI for me. --Steindy 23:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC).
    Sorry I disagree with you, please other opinions.--Reda Kerbouche 07:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
      Support I'm unwilling to interfere with creative choices made by other photographers, intentional or not unless they impinge on the image quality. In this case the leaves give some scale to the tablet and do not obscure it. Rodhullandemu 09:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Perfectly OK, and photographers don't have to sweep the streets in order to take acceptable photographs. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. --King of Hearts 22:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. --Smial 07:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support irresponsible oppose by Steindy Charlesjsharp 20:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)