Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 26 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Villa_les_Coucous,_Bois_de_Cise_IA80001282.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Cottage les Coucous, in Ault (Bois de Cise). --Pierre André Leclercq 21:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment I'd find it better to crop the sky a bit and to focus more on the building. --Hillopo2018 08:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment There's no vote here, so the status shouldn't be the misleading "Discuss", which moves it to Consensual Review for multiple votes. Please change the status to "Promotion" if you support the edited version of the file," "Decline" if you don't and back to "Nomination" if you would like to discuss things more with the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek 21:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hillopo2018 09:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, the image appears heavily over-sharpened and yet blurred in detail at the same time. --Smial 10:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you for advise. I revert to the first version. -Pierre André Leclercq 14:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Disturbingly oversharpened in this version. -- Ikan Kekek 21:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Oversharpend. --Steindy 23:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Black-crowned_night_heron_(Nycticorax_nycticorax)_juvenile_in_flight.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) juvenile --Charlesjsharp 13:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Not sharp and strong artifacts. --Steindy 20:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    New version uploaded. Sent for discussion as this user targets my nominations with revenge votes --Charlesjsharp 20:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
      Support Good enough for me. Rodhullandemu 07:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Considering that it's a flying bird, the image is good. Greetings --Dirtsc 15:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Viking_Sky_(ship,_2017)_at_Liverpool_1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View of Viking Sky at Liverpool Cruise Terminal along the starboard side from the bow. --Rodhullandemu 20:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Large sensor spot. Also too tight crop of the front. --Steindy 21:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    Sorry, Google doesn't tell me what a sensor spot is, and the Oxford English Dictionary doesn't define "tught". Rodhullandemu 22:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    Okay, dann eben auf deutsch. "Zu knapper Beschnitt" - Es ist fein, dass Sie sich noch nie vertippt haben. Und was mit dem "spot" gemeint war, ist schwierig. Noch dazu wo ich diesen markiert habe.
      Comment Just because I don't understand your English doesn't mean I can understand your German. Also see COM:NPA. Rodhullandemu 07:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK quality. Front crop is tight. No idea what the sensor problem is. --Charlesjsharp 20:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Large dust spot. --Steindy 23:11, 17 September 2021
      Comment Removed. Please reconsider. Rodhullandemu 07:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There is chromatic noise everywhere on the sky and on water. --A.Savin 13:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Fixed. Or, does anyone want to buy a camera? Rodhullandemu 16:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK now. --A.Savin 12:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good. I think. Mike1979 Russia 09:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The last version shows strange artifacts and loss of detail, probably due to a conflict between denoising and post-sharpening. --Smial 10:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Trierer Märtyrer (1).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sculpture Trierer Märtyrer at Sankt Paulinus Basilica in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 08:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Comment Perspective correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 09:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
      Comment Turned ccw. Please discuss. --Palauenc05 13:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
      Support Good Quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 13:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support There is no need for perspective correction on photos of statues, first. Second, how does it come, that if there is no opposition, this candidate is on CR. It should be promoted right away! --Moroder 11:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Princes_Dock,_Liverpool_-_aerial.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View of the northern half of Princes Dock, Liverpool, from the adjacent car park. --Rodhullandemu 19:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Sorry: cropped tower. --F. Riedelio 12:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    That tower is the sixth tallest building in Liverpool at 88 metres (290 ft). To include it all would make the subject of the image, Princes Dock, less relevant than intended, defeating the photographer's intention. And it has its own category. Second opinion sought from those who understand framing and composition, please. Rodhullandemu 13:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
      Comment I'll just point out that nobody compained about the cropped tower block in this QI. Rodhullandemu 08:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Still many CA's on the left. --A.Savin 10:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Fixed, I hope. Rodhullandemu 19:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK. --A.Savin 20:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support now. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with F. Riedelio, the image looks unbalanced to me --Poco a poco 08:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment (a) The photo is of the dock, not the tower at the end of it. (b) Why no complaint about the cropping of the building at the left? Rodhullandemu 08:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan & A.Savin --Smial 13:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per F. Riedelio and Poco a poco. --Steindy 23:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support A little bit dull, but overall OK. --Dirtsc 15:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Thanks, but this is the North of England. Dull is the norm. Rodhullandemu 10:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
      •   Comment The sun is shining!!!!11 Must be a fake. ;-) --Smial 11:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)