Last modified on 8 October 2014, at 13:15

Commons:Valued image candidates

This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


RenominationEdit

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
14,434 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
12,203 (84.5%) 
Undecided
  
868 (6%) 
Declined
  
1,363 (9.4%) 


New valued image nominationsEdit

   
Preveli World War II Memorial.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:04 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial of Preveli, Crete

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Kaczka krzyżowka w wodzie (samiec).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Anas platyrhynchos swimming (male), side view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, ambitious scope, good. But together with this or that, what's the best? –Be..anyone (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Both images are focus problems (too small DOF). --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, at modem speed I can't do a FPC review, and this is VIC. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I think while it is technically slightly inferior, this currently featured image is better in some aspects: a) composition/crop b) characteristic curled tailfeathers are visible c) bird is actively swimming forward instead of just drifting around. I guess that should be handled through a Most Valued Review? --El Grafo (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 29 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
29 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:49, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Paczków, Rynek 31 02.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
31 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 07.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:56 (UTC)
Scope:
36 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Paczków, Rynek 38 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 11:10 (UTC)
Scope:
38 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Sword parts numbered.svg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-01-26 11:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of the sword parts

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Federal-Territory-Mosque-03.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) on 2015-01-26 11:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Federal Territory Mosque, Kuala Lumpur

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Provenzano DJ-1.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-01-26 11:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Provenzano DJ
Used in:
de:Provenzano DJ, fr:Provenzano DJ, it:Amerigo Provenzano

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Yashica 635withTelelense.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2015-01-26 12:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Yashica 635 TLR camera with telephoto lens in situ.
Used in:
:fr:Wikibooks/Photographie/Fabricants/Yashica/Yashica_635
Reason:
It was rare for a TLR camera to be used in conjunction with auxiliary lenses as this necessitated two lenses whereas a single lens reflex camera only needed a single lens. The nominator believes not only that this is the only image in Commons within the scope of the Yashica 635 camera, but that this is the best example of all TLR cameras in Commons. -- Martinvl (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Scope too broad; there should be in the scope, the exact model.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

  • @User:Archaeodontosaurus: Scope changed to reflect your comments -- Martinvl (talk) 11:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The scope is now way too narrow. Currently this is the only image in that scope, which seems to me to be be an extremely unlikely subject for any Commons search. -- PlasmaBall (talk) 07:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Bearing in mind that Archaeodontosaurus said that the exact model should be part of the scope, what text do you propose? -- Martinvl (talk) 21:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The scope is well written. Our basic photographic data, grown every day. Try to anticipate possible conflicts by specific scopes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Collioure - La Tour de l' Etoile.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-26 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Fortification Tour de l'étoile in Collioure, France
Used in:
de:Collioure, fr:Collioure

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Rissoina rosea 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-01-26 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Rissoina rosea spotted form, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Schelmenturm (Monheim am Rhein).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Anıl Ö. (talk) on 2015-01-26 22:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Schelmenturm Monheim

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Too strong aberration perspective. This image is better file:Monheim am Rhein, Schelmenturm, 2013-02 CN-01.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Baculum Macaca fuscata MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-27 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Japanese macaque - Penis bone

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Masse victor.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-27 06:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Grave of Victor Massé, Montmartre Cimetery Paris.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best picture that we have within this scope. -- Martinvl (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rio de la Fornace (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-27 06:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Rio Fornace (Venice). View from Ponte San Gregorio to Ponte Santi.

Pictogram voting question.svg Question Is this the view of the Ponte San Gregorio or the view from the Ponte San Gregorio. This site shows that the Ponte San Gregorio is at the northern end of the Rio Fornace while this view from Google maps, taken from under the Ponte San Gregorio looking southwards shows a similar view to the nominated photo. Martinvl (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done My knowledge of English date from my college years. This is where I see there in a long time...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In my view, this is currently the best picture in scope. -- Martinvl (talk) 13:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Eglise lalande.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-27 11:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Saint-Jean de Lalande-de-Pomerol, France
Used in:
fr:Église Saint-Jean de Lalande-de-Pomerol, en:Lalande-de-Pomerol, de:Lalande-de-Pomerol

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 39 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-27 12:22 (UTC)
Scope:
39 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 40 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-27 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
40 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 44 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-27 12:49 (UTC)
Scope:
44 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 48 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-27 12:58 (UTC)
Scope:
48 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
140519 Dom Fulda Frontansicht.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2015-01-27 13:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Fulda Cathedral, view from east
Used in:
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In my view, this image is better - the sky is blue and the front of the church is not in shadow. -- Martinvl (talk) 13:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Martinvl, I don't agree: the perspective of your favourite is somewhat distorted and the crop is unfortunate: too much sky and pavement. Hence:

Symbol support vote.svg Support PRO --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, ul Wojska Polskiego 23 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-27 13:05 (UTC)
Scope:
23 Wojska Polskiego Street in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
NSU Lux.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-27 16:20 (UTC)
Scope:
NSU Lux motorcycle, built in 1952
Used in:
de:NSU Lux, en:NSU Motorenwerke, fr:NSU Motorenwerke AG

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kanchanaburi-07.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2015-01-27 16:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Railway bridge over the river Kwai Yai, Kanchanaburi, Thailand , S-SW exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Argelès valmy.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-27 21:30 (UTC)
Scope:
General view of Argelès-sur-Mer, France, seen from Tour de Massane
Used in:
de:Argelès-sur-Mer, fr:Argelès-sur-Mer, it:Argelès-sur-Mer, ca:Rosselló

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bayernhafen AB 1.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
KaiBorgeest (talk) on 2015-01-27 23:06 (UTC)
Scope:
DB Class 259
Used in:
de:DB-Baureihe_259

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Grus antigone MHNT 226 Australie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-28 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Grus antigone (Sarus Crane) egg

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Elbaite Elbe.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-28 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Elbaite, San Piero in Campo, Elba Island, Italy - Topotype deposit

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ponte dei pugni (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-28 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte dei pugni (Venice) - West exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Bryant2000 (talk) 15:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ouwsterhaule, monument bij de N.H. begraafplaats 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-01-28 06:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Ouwsterhaule War Memorial in Ouwsterhaule. The Netherlands.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A few points:

  • The image lacks a geolocation [mandatory].
  • The scope is clumsy since it include the word "Ouwsterhaule" twice. Try rephrasing it. Also, is this the only such memorial in the town, or are there other similar monuments? If there are other monuments, the scope should be reworded so as to be clear which monument it is referring to.
  • There is also no description of the monument, especially as the text is in the Frisian language. May I suggest something like (English version): "Monument at the Ouwsterhaule cemetery in the Netherlands commemorating Jetze Veldstra who died at Neuengamme on 17.1.1945 while fighting the German occupation. The burning torch represents the fire of resistance while the wreath is a sign of mourning. The text on the monument is in the Frisian language. "
-- Martinvl (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
answer The description of the monument is under the photo (3rd line no. 218) is the only war memorial in the village. There is a stone in the woods near a dropping field.

This is an image of a war memorial in the Netherlands, with number: 218. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg location, fy:, and de: info added, please check. –Be..anyone (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, location updated by Martinvl. –Be..anyone (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for you additional information in English.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pergamon Acropolis.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Imehling (talk) on 2015-01-28 08:33 (UTC)
Scope:
View of the Pergamon Acropolis, seen from the Sanctuary of Asclepius, Pergamon, Turkey.
Used in:
en:Pergamon
Reason:
View of acropolis of Pergamon as it looks today from Asclepion. The image contains the two most important archeological sites of Pergamon. -- Imehling (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Scope must be linked to a category. --P e z i (talk) 18:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image can't represent the complete category. Please read instructions on scope. --P e z i (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Ok, I hope that's a better choice for category --Imehling (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. -- Palauenc05 (talk) 17:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Danke für die Hilfe beim Scopen. --Imehling (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 10.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-28 12:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów, main portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, Brama Wróbla.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-28 12:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Wróbla Gate in Otmuchów, view from W

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, ul. Nyska 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-28 12:20 (UTC)
Scope:
2 Nyska Street in Otmuchów

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, ul. Nyska 4.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-28 12:40 (UTC)
Scope:
4 Nyska Street in Otmuchów

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, zamek 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-28 12:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Otmuchów Castle, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, pałac 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-28 13:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace at the Otmuchów Castle, view from SSW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 00:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Village des pecheurs1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-28 16:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Traditional fishing house at Étang de Canet-Saint-Nazaire, Canet-Plage, France.
Used in:
de:Canet-en-Roussillon, fr:Canet-en-Roussillon

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Longpont (Aisne)-01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2015-01-28 16:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Sebastian, Longpont, Aisne, bell tower, S-SW exposure
Reason:
The only picture of the church in the scope. -- Wayne77 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rissoina tornatilis 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-01-28 20:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Rissoina tornatilis, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Michele Boldrin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-01-28 23:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Michele Boldrin
Used in:
en:Michele Boldrin, fr:Michele Boldrin, it:Michele Boldrin,

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ciseau poli MHNT PRE 2004 0 132 Moura Somrong Sen.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-29 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Polished stone chisel - Bronze age - Samrong Sen, Cambodge

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bataille de Toulouse - Obélisque.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-29 06:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Obelisque de la bataille de Toulouse - Northeast exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa del Redentore (Venice) Interior.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-29 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa del Redentore (Venice) - Interior

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, studnia 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-29 12:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Well with casing at the Otmuchów Castle

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-29 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Park at the Otmuchów Castle
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. -- Palauenc05 (talk) 08:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, Rynek 3 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-29 12:57 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Market Square in Otmuchów

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Otmuchów, Rynek 4 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-29 13:01 (UTC)
Scope:
4 Market Square in Otmuchów

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Nysa, kościół Zwiastowania NMP 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-29 13:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of the Annunciation in Nysa, view from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Nysa, Bazylika św. Jakuba i św. Agnieszki, witraż.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-29 14:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Stained glass windows in Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa
Open for review.
Peugeot mobylette bb von 1957.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-29 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Peugeot motorcycle type: Cyclomoteur BB, built 1957
Used in:
de:Peugeot, fr:Peugeot BB

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Incisive de bovidé percée (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-30 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Gargas cave - Perforated bovid Incisor

Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cappella Sagredo of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Tiepolo .jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-30 06:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Cappella Sagredo of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). Tiepolo fresco: Evangelists.

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Galata Tower January 2015.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2015-01-30 07:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Galata Tower as seen from the NE
Reason:
as far as I know only image of the tower from this direction that does not need further perspective correction. -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:36, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chandelier inside Süleymaniye Mosque.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2015-01-30 07:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Chandeliers in the Süleymaniye Mosque
Reason:
The only image that shows the grand chandelier in its entirety -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. -- Palauenc05 (talk) 08:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Frank Mentzer - Lucca Comics & Games 2014 (cropped).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-01-30 09:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Frank Mentzer
Used in:
bg:Франк Менцер, en:Frank Mentzer, ja:フランク・メンツァー

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best portrait. -- Palauenc05 (talk) 10:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Saba Anglana.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-01-30 09:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Saba Anglana
Used in:
en:Saba Anglana, fi:Saba (laulaja) , it:Saba Anglana
Open for review.
Jean Jacques Liabeuf IJ.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-01-30 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Jean-Jacques Liabeuf, mugshot.
Used in:
fr:Jean-Jacques Liabeuf
Reason:
A famous french criminal. Was unfairly senteced to prison for a few months for procurement. When out of prison, he decided to revenge against "the society" by killing cops. He succeeded, was arrested, sentenced to death, and executed by guillotine. He became a symbol for anarchists, and his case was called by the press "the Dreyfus Affair of the Poor". On the scaffold, he claimed he was innocent... of procurement. Better than the previous version, this one is reworked from the original, restored by me. The original is available as first upload in the file page. No geocode, it is (and was) a studio shot. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-30 11:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica Complex in Nysa,view from SW
Open for review.
2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 002.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-30 12:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, view from NE
Open for review.
2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 058.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-30 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, main nave
Open for review.
2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 047.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-30 12:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, main portals
Open for review.
2014 Nysa, kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-30 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, view from NW
Open for review.
CelsiusKelvinThermometer.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2015-01-30 14:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Room temperature thermometer showing kelvins
Used in:
w:en:Kelvin, w:de:Kelvin, w:fr:Kelvin, w:ru:Кельвин, w:it:Kelvin, w:es:Kelvin, w:pl:Kelwin and many more
Open for review.
Lacoste (Vaucluse) -04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2015-01-30 16:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Lacoste, Vaucluse, Statue of the Good Shepherd.
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidatesEdit

Collegiate Church in TumEdit

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927Edit

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien MitteEdit

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Valle de los CaídosEdit

   
Valle de los caidos by forcy-cruz y basilica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Under MVR.--Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
SPA-2014-San Lorenzo de El Escorial-Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-12-10 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos (West)
Used in:
Valle de los Caídos

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : there's already a VI of this site with a similar orientation. Although this one is better imo, it seems that a MVR is needed.--JLPC (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Grasleitenpasshütte, View from EastEdit

   
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, here I don't see that this place isn't too adventurous. –10:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte ganz.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

New valued image set nominationsEdit

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidatesEdit