Last modified on 21 October 2013, at 07:13

Commons:Valued image candidates

This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


RenominationEdit

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
11956 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
9852 (82.4%) 
Undecided
  
786 (6.6%) 
Declined
  
1318 (11%) 


New valued image nominationsEdit

   
Faule Aschach Niederaching.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Linie29 (talk) on 2014-07-19 00:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Rivers of Upper Austria, Faule Aschach, Niederaching
Reason:
Only picture of the river "Faule Aschach" in this scope. -- Linie29 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 10:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Chaillevette 17 Ostréiculture tracteur Chatressac 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-07-19 12:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Oyster tractor in Chaillevette, Charente-Maritime, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Carabus nemoralis MHNT Dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-19 13:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Carabus nemoralis (Wood Carabid) dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 13:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di San Vidal (Venice) Facade.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-19 13:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Church San Vidal in Venice. Façade on Campiello San Vidal.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tarfala valley panorama.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) on 2014-07-19 13:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Tarfala
Used in:
Tarfala Valley
Reason:
There wasn't any good overview image of the notable features at this location before I uploaded this panorama. -- Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Colophospermum mopane arbre MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-19 14:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Colophospermum mopane (balsam tree)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Colophospermum mopane feuilles MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-19 14:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Colophospermum mopane (balsam tree), Leaf

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Commiphora saxicola arbuste MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-19 14:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Commiphora saxicola (Rock Corkwood)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hemerocallis 'Helle Berlinerin'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-07-19 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Hemerocallis 'Helle Berlinerin' Flower

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cellana radiata radiata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-07-20 06:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Cellana radiata ssp. radiata (Rayed Limpet), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aglia tau MHNT Male Dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-20 07:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglia tau (Tau Emperor), mounted specimen, male, dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 13:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aglia tau MHNT Male ventre.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-20 07:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglia tau (Tau Emperor), mounted specimen, male, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 13:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ianthinit, Menzenschwand.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Klaproth (talk) on 2014-07-20 10:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Ianthinite
Used in:
de.wikipedia

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good & Useful (Look at the change in the syntax of scope.) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ficus burkei fruits MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-20 11:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficus burkei (Common Wild Fig) fruit

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ficus sycomorus fruits MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-20 11:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficus sycomorus (sycamore fig) fruit

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Helichrysum gariepinum fleurs MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-20 11:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Helichrysum gariepinum Flowers

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
FH Oberoesterreich Campus Steyr DSC 2868w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-07-20 12:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Fachhochschule Steyr, SSW view
Used in:
de:FH Oberösterreich

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montpeyroux 24 Église clocher 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-07-20 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Church tower of Montpeyroux, Dordogne, FranceSW view
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Mønsted kalkgruber exposure fused 2014-07-18.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2014-07-20 18:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Mønsted Limestone Mine, interior
Used in:
da:Mønsted Kalkgruber and de:Mønsted-Kalkgruben
Reason:
Gives in my opinion the best impression of the complicated structure of the pathways of the mine, which were active for almost 1000 years and where limestone was excavated by hand and carried out either by hand or pulled by a horse. -- Slaunger (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Myrabella (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC) P.S. I would add "interior" in the scope, though.

That is a good point, Myrabella. I have modified the scope accordingly. --Slaunger (talk) 19:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Stadtplatz 30 Steyr DSC 2798w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-07-20 20:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Stadtplatz 30 (Steyr), facade

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stadtplatz 12 Steyr DSC 2764w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-07-20 20:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Sternhaus (Steyr), facade
Used in:
de:Sternhaus (Steyr)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope (Natural deformation of the building is impressive) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gragnague - Le clocher-mur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-21 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Gragnague, Haute-Garonne France. Church Saint-Vincent : Bell gable.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Santa Lucia (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-21 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Lucia churche. Memorial plaque on the location of the Santa Lucia church, in Venice.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 08:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rosa × centifolia 21072014 (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Joydeep Talk on 2014-07-21 08:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Rosa × centifolia flower

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good choice imo. --JLPC (talk) 13:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Louis XX.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vanoot59 (talk) on 2014-07-20 14:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Louis de Bourbon, duke of Anjou

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I suggest to add "2014" to the scope, as we usually do here for people. --JLPC (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. I think a date is needed here. Yann (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Pons 17 Église façade vue ouest 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-07-21 13:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Pons, Charente-Maritime, France, facade
Reason:
Best in small scope imo -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 15:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Euphorbia damarana 1 MHNT.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-21 14:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Euphorbia damarana (Damara milk-bush, melkbos), fruit

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Diospyros chamaethamnus fruit MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-21 14:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Diospyros chamaethamnus (Sand Apple), fruit

Symbol support vote.svg Support ok -- Christian Ferrer Talk 04:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hyphaene petersiana arbres MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-07-21 14:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Hyphaene petersiana (Real fan palm)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Golconda Fort 002 - Baradari.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-07-21 20:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Baradari of the Golconda Fort, India (exterior) South view
Open for review.
Botryphallus epidauricus 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-07-22 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Botryphallus epidauricus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support More the shell is small, more work is great. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pic de Vissou from North.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer Talk 04:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC) on 2014-07-22 04:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Cabrières, Hérault, France. Pic de Vissou from North.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Halcyon leucocephala MHNT ZOO 2010 11 160 RdN Santiago Cap-Vert.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-22 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Halcyon leucocephala (Grey-headed kingfisher) , eggs

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 06:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di Santa Maria dei Servi (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-22 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Santa Maria dei Servi in Venice. Fragments of the facade and porch.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 10:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Just curious: Why is the category part of itself? --P e z i (talk) 10:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
It is indeed very strange. I think it is I who created it. I think I repaired. Thank you for your vigilance. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Stadtplatz 46 Steyr DSC 2815w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-07-22 10:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Steyr Stadtplatz 46, facade
Used in:
de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Steyr-Steyr/S–Z

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Le Tréport-01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2014-07-22 10:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Gare du Tréport-Mers, Le Tréport, Seine-Maritime, facade.
Reason:
Good perspective -- Wayne77 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Saint-Parize-le-Châtel-01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2014-07-22 13:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Patrice de Saint-Parize-le-Châtel, Nièvre, facade, South West exposure.
Reason:
Good perspective -- Wayne77 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Steyr Gruenmarkt 8 DSC 2818w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-07-22 13:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Steyr Grünmarkt 8, facade
Used in:
de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Steyr-Steyr/A–G
Reason:
Good perspective -- P e z i (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Charroux 86 Eglise 2012.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-07-22 15:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Church tower of Charroux, Vienne, France, NW view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 16:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kongress und Theaterhaus Bad Ischl DSC 3295w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-07-22 20:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Congress and Theater building Bad Ischl, East view
Used in:

de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Bad Ischl

de:Kongress & Theaterhaus Bad Ischl

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kriegerdenkmal bei Bahnhofstr 1 Bad Ischl DSC 3410w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-07-22 22:20 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial, Bad Ischl
Used in:
de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Bad Ischl
Open for review.
Golconda Fort 012 - Ambar Khana.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-07-22 23:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Ambar Khana, Golconda Fort, India (exterior) East view
Open for review.
Grande sauterelle verte Mandibules.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-23 05:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Tettigonia viridissima, Mandible

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 06:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église Saint-Exupère de Toulouse Interior chapelle Notre-Dame de la Salette.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-07-23 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Saint-Exupère from Toulouse, chapelle Notre-Dame de la Salette
Open for review.
Chateau Tanlay fresques Tour de la Ligue.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Myrabella (talk) on 2014-07-23 05:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Frescos in the Tour de la Ligue of the Château de Tanlay, Burgundy, France.
Reason:
The most complete available view of these curious frescos depicting political figures of the time of the French Wars of Religion. -- Myrabella (talk)
Open for review.

Closed valued image candidatesEdit

Most valued reviewsEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR has to be in the discussed state, while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Shiva-Parvati-SFAsianArtMuseum.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Hispalois (talk) on 2013-08-11 00:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Shiva and Parvati in sculpture.
Reason:
Only image in Commons of Shiva and Parvati (both in sculpture and in painting) that displays Shiva with an erect penis. -- Hispalois (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support best in rich scope. Good caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

New valued image set nominationsEdit

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidatesEdit