Last modified on 8 October 2014, at 13:15

Commons:Valued image candidates

This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Shortcut
COM:VIC
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


RenominationEdit

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
15,778 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
13,483 (85.5%) 
Undecided
  
895 (5.7%) 
Declined
  
1,400 (8.9%) 


New valued image nominationsEdit

   
AU NavalEnsignHalfMast.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2015-05-04 20:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Flag at half mast
Reason:
Many countries fly flags at half-mast as a sign of mourning. It is appropriate that at least one good example should be available to Commons user to illustrate this practice . I believe that the scope "Flag XXXX at half-mast" is too restrictive for use as a VI scope as this can produce hundreds of images. For this reason, I propose that the best illustration be selected as an example of a flag at half-mast. I believe that this image is the best such image in Commons even though the flag itself (the Australian Naval Ensign) is relatively insignificant (with all due respect to those who serve in the Australian Navy). -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 09.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-19 14:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Nowy Waliszów, main entrance
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's the only one and so it's the best in scope. (And it's good too.)--XRay talk 14:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Trzebieszowice, zespół dworski, mur oporowy, 13.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-28 12:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Park in Trzebieszowice, balustrade

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Antillean crested hummingbird.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-29 10:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Orthorhyncus cristatus (Antillean crested hummingbird)
Used in:
Orthorhyncus cristatus Wikipedia Orthorhyncus cristatus
Reason:
best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info There is an existing VI with the 'male' scope (this is a male too, right?), which I think could be said to be just as good. I may be biased though, as I took that photo;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 17:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I just reworked the alternative from raw using Lightroom, which I believe has improved the image quality. I did not have Lightroom in 2010 ;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 18:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I think it's a male too, but can't be sure. I did check out yours - naturally we tend to favour our own pic - but I genuinely thought this one is better - who knows! --Charles (talk) 20:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Trzebieszowice, zespół dworski, 09.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-29 12:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Park in Trzebieszowice, neoclassical sculpture from the late nineteenth century

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is too little information on this objet.Il are many sculptures in this park. Should characterize a little more. The date of manufacture, the name of the work, or the name of the author.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately sources who I have no say nothing more moreover, it is a neoclassical sculpture from the late nineteenth century. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It can't be VI without at least the name of the sculptor and who this sculpture is of. Sorry. Yann (talk) 07:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Trzebieszowice, zespół dworski, 43.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-29 12:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Trzebieszowice, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Trzebieszowice, zespół dworski, 37.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-29 12:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Trzebieszowice, side portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Trzebieszowice, zespół dworski, 35.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-29 13:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Trzebieszowice, coats of arms of the von Reichenbach family

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hayman Seleg Mendelssohn, Ellen Terry 1886.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-29 13:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Ellen Terry
Reason:
English stage actress. Studio shot, so no geocoding. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Safou fruit cutaway 2.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Cartoffel (talk) on 2015-04-29 14:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Dacryodes edulis (safou), fruit
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info There is also shot from another angle which "jumps" more at the viewer, but the individual features could be more easily distinguishable here, I think. -- Cartoffel (talk) 14:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I've adjusted the scope to what I think would be appropriate, please check if that's OK for you all. I'm not sure if safou is the English vernacular name, but looking at en:Dacryodes edulis it seems to be the best candidate out several. Concerning the two images, I'd slightly lean towards the other one, but I'm OK with both. --El Grafo (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Why geocoding? I can try to find out the rough area where it was grown/collected, which seems far more relevant than the arbitrary location where it was transported to and photographed.--Cartoffel (talk) 09:09, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes I completely agree with that but it must be said, where does the seed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:57, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info grown in Cameroon. (Is that precise enough? I asked around and got a phone number where I could ask for further details on monday.)--Cartoffel (talk) 19:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's too broad. the name of a region or the name of the village would be appreciated. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jeleniów, kościół, 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-29 15:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów, main entrance

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is best in scope however if this image is the main entrance of the churh, so you should write it in the description of the file too, not only in the scope. -- Christian Ferrer 06:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Jeleniów, zespoł pałacowy, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-29 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace park in Jeleniów, main gate

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Red-billed streamertail (Trochilus poltmus) juvenile male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-29 20:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Trochilus polytmus, (Red-billed streamertail), juvenile male
Used in:
Trochilus polytmus Wikipedia Trochilus polytmus
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No, it is not yet a "Best Picture." Your image is saturated in yellow. The feathers of the poitirne of this species are green and white. With Cs6, looking at the blue histogram. It is completely offset, in a few seconds you can fix it and the result is really good. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks, I agree. --Charles (talk) 10:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Red-billed streamertail( Trochilus polytmus) adult male 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-29 20:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Trochilus polytmus, (Red-billed streamertail), male
Used in:
Trochilus polytmus Wikipedia Trochilus polytmus
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Red-billed streamertail (Trochilus polytmus) feeding.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-29 20:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Trochilus polytmus, (Red-billed streamertail), adult male feeding
Used in:
Trochilus polytmus Wikipedia Trochilus polytmus
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Vervain hummingbird (Mellisuga minima).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-29 20:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Mellisuga minima, (Vervain hummingbird)
Used in:
Mellisuga minima Wikipedia Mellisuga minima
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Vervain hummingbird (Mellisuga minima) feeding.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-29 20:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Mellisuga minima, (Vervain hummingbird), feeding
Used in:
Mellisuga minima Wikipedia Mellisuga minima
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Really too blurry. VI is not a default choice. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Vervain hummingbirds (Mellisuga minima) courting.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-29 20:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Mellisuga minima, (Vervain hummingbirds), courting
Used in:
Mellisuga minima Wikipedia Mellisuga minima
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting but very blurred --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Anthrenus pimpinellae MHNT both sides.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-30 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Anthrenus pimpinellae both sides

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Bessens Chemin de Verdun.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-30 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Bessens, France – Le chemin de Verdun

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Santa Maria della Grazia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-30 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Maria della Grazia Venice - North exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Maria Cecilia Guerra - Trento.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-04-30 08:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Maria Cecilia Guerra
Used in:
fr:Maria Cecilia Guerra, it:Maria Cecilia Guerra, it:q:Maria Cecilia Guerra

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Masasumi Kakizaki - Lucca Comics & Games 2014.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-04-30 08:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Masasumi Kakizaki
Used in:
de:Masasumi Kakizaki, fr:Masasumi Kakizaki, it:Masasumi Kakizaki, ja:柿崎正澄

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Jamaican mango (Anthracothorax mango) male.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-30 10:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Anthracothorax mango, (Jamaican mango)
Used in:
Anthracothorax mango Wikipedia Anthracothorax mango
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)
Open for review.
Jamaican oriole (Icterus leucopteryx).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-30 10:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Icterus leucopteryx, (Jamaican oriole)
Used in:
Icterus leucopteryx Wikipedia Icterus leucopteryx
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia & not at a feeder -- Charles (talk)
Open for review.
American kestrel (Falco sparverius).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-30 10:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Falco sparverius, (American kestrel), sub-species F. s. dominicensis
Used in:
Icterus leucopteryx Wikipedia Icterus leucopteryx
Reason:
Only image on Commons and Wikipedia of sub-species -- Charles (talk)

obviously best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Greater antillean bullfinch (Loxigilla violacea).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-30 10:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Loxigilla violacea, (Greater antillean bullfinch)
Open for review.
Black-faced grassquit (Tiaris bicolor) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-30 10:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Tiaris bicolor, (Black-faced grassquit), male
Used in:
Tiaris bicolor Wikipedia Tiaris bicolor
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bgag (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Black-faced grassquit (Tiaris bicolor) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-30 10:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Tiaris bicolor, (Black-faced grassquit ), female
Used in:
Tiaris bicolor Wikipedia Tiaris bicolor
Reason:
Best image on Commons and Wikipedia -- Charles (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bgag (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Lewin, kościół, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-30 12:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki, exsposure from ENE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Lewin, kościół, 12.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-30 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Lewin, kościół, 23.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-30 12:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki, old cemetery at the church

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Lewin, Chopina 4, 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-30 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
4 Chopina Street in Lewin Kłodzki, exposure from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Lewin, Chopina 4, 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-30 13:39 (UTC)
Scope:
4 Chopina Street in Lewin Kłodzki, portico

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Lewin, Kościuszki 18, 08.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-30 13:56 (UTC)
Scope:
18 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hıdırlık Tower 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2015-04-30 15:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Hıdırlık Tower, Antalya, Turkey (South view)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Xanten, Kriemhildmühle -- 2014 -- 00703.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2015-04-30 16:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Kriemhildmühle in Xanten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Used in:
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Xanten

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is titl cw and perspektive problems (top sides is lenning in). --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Sythen, Haus Sythen -- 2014 -- 00607.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2015-04-30 16:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Schloss Sythen (Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany); view from street side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Iglesia Nuestra Señora de Regla - Pajara - side altar.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-04-30 18:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Regla, Pájara, Fuerteventura, southern nave, side altar

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Clara Louise Kellogg - NARA - 527882restoredh.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-30 21:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Clara Louise Kellogg
Reason:
American singer. Studio shot, so no geocoding. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bratyslawa Elzbieta Wegierska.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2015-04-30 22:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Mosaics of Elisabeth of Hungary
Open for review.
Cieszyn Studnia Trzech Braci 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2015-04-30 23:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bratyslawa Dom u Dobrego Pasterza.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2015-04-30 23:07 (UTC)
Scope:
House At the Good Shepherd in Bratislava, exposure from S

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It should bring up the name of the city in the scope. It is recommeded to give orientaion of sight; because in the scope that you porposes this picture is not the best to understand the building. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
* Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm confused Didier. You told me that it was not necessary for this image to have the city name in the scope. --Charles (talk) 07:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support I corrected the scope. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting building. --Mile (talk) 19:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Charlesjsharp: It is necessary that the place should easily identifiable. Either because it is in the scope or in the legend in English. In this case it was not in one or the other. Now it's perfect.
Open for review.
Kosciol Elzbiety w Bratyslawie.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2015-04-30 23:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Blue Church (Bratislava) - exposure from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Webysther (talk) on 2015-05-01 00:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Painel Tiradentes by Candido Portinari
Used in:
Candido Portinari Wikipedia Portuguese and Candido Portinari Wikipedia English.
Reason:
Unique image in internet with this quality, one of best works of Portinari. This work show the history about Tiradentes, was a leading member of the Brazilian revolutionary movement known as the Inconfidência Mineira whose aim was full independence from the Portuguese colonial power and to create a Brazilian republic. He became a martir. -- Webysther (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall'. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-05-01 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall' Inflorescences.
Open for review.
Vautour moine MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-01 07:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Aegypius monachus (Cinereous Vulture) egg

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cujas - Palais de Justice de Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-01 07:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Toulouse Courthouse - facade of the Court of Appeal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Scuola grande di San Giovanni Evangelista - Venezia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-01 07:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Scuola Grande di San Giovanni Evangelista - Venezia

Symbol support vote.svg Support BIS -- Christian Ferrer 09:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Natrix maura, Olargues 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer 07:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC) on 2015-05-01 07:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Natrix maura (Viperine water snake). Dorsal view.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO best in scope, but the should be the category Natrix maura instead of the gallery. I fixed it. --XRay talk 08:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • When a gallery exist, I was thinking it was the usual choice here in the VIC page. But ok, thanks. -- Christian Ferrer 08:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Image is to dark. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done brightened -- Christian Ferrer 17:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Cascadas del Purgatorio - 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kadellar (talk) on 2015-05-01 10:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Purgatory Falls (upper fall)
Reason:
The other picture of the upper fall are this one and this one -- Kadellar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lewin, Kościuszki 20, 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-01 11:02 (UTC)
Scope:
20 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, portal
Open for review.
Lewin, Kościuszki 18, 10.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-01 11:10 (UTC)
Scope:
18 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, keystone with the house mark
Open for review.
2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-01 11:15 (UTC)
Scope:
13 Wolności Square in Międzylesie, portal
Open for review.
2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-01 11:34 (UTC)
Scope:
15 Wolności Square in Międzylesie, gate
Open for review.
2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 09.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-01 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
2-4 Wojska Polskiego Street in Międzylesie, arcades
Open for review.
2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 10.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-01 11:59 (UTC)
Scope:
2-4 Wojska Polskiego Street in Międzylesie, main entrance
Open for review.
Iglesia Nuestra Señora de Regla - Pájara - Madonna.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-01 16:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Regla, Pájara, Fuerteventura, Señora de la Regla

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lessines hopital ND de la rose.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Velvet (talk) on 2015-05-01 17:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Notre-Dame à la Rose hospital in Lessines, Belgium (NW view)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chilostoma cingulatum colubrinum 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-01 19:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Chilostoma cingulatum ssp. colubrinum, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nymphalis antiopa MHNT CUT 2013 3 13 Tombebœuf Male Dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-02 06:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Nymphalis antiopa (Mourning Cloak), mounted specimen - Male - Dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bessens église de l’Assomption.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-02 06:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Bessens, Bell gable of Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Geremia (Venice) Vergine tra San Francesco di Sales e San Giovanni Nepomuceno sculture marmoree di G. Marchiori.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-02 06:51 (UTC)
Scope:
San Geremia (Venice). Virgin between St. Francis de Sales and St. John of Nepomuk; by "Giovanni Marchiori"

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Natrix maura, Olargues 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer 08:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC) on 2015-05-02 08:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Natrix maura (Viperine water snake). Side view.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Image is to dark. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 15.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-02 09:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, Magnis family's chapel
Open for review.
2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 23.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-02 09:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, belfry
Open for review.
2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 22.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-02 09:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, tented roof
Open for review.
2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-02 09:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, exposure from SE
Open for review.
2014 Bożków, pałac 21.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-02 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Bożków Palace, portico
Open for review.
2014 Bożków, pałac 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-02 10:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Bożków Palace, exposure from SW
Open for review.
Pleurotomaria expansa 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-02 19:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Pleurotomaria expansa, Internal molding

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nymphalis antiopa MHNT CUT 2013 3 13 Tombebœuf Male Ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-03 05:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Nymphalis antiopa mounted specimen - Ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Symbol support vote.svg Support --Charles (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tour de Guillaume Garreri - Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-03 05:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Tour de Guillaume Garreri in Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Arezzo Palazzo della Fraternita dei Laici.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-03 05:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo della fraternità dei laici (Arezzo) - Bell gable

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You need to improve convergence of perspective. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2015-05-03 08:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Arian Baptistry (Ravenna) - Vault mosaics
Used in:
Ravenna, Arian Baptistry
Reason:
So far best in scope. I did put in sqare crop, even prefering rectangle, but some didnt like it. Geolocation is in Infobox of Baptistry. -- Mile (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-03 10:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Park and garden terraces at the Bożków Palace, palace annex, exposure from SW
Open for review.
2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-03 10:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Park and garden terraces at the Bożków Palace, garden terraces
Open for review.
2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-03 11:27 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, crest founder of the church
Open for review.
2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-03 11:36 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, portal
Open for review.
2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 10.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-03 11:42 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, stone cross at the church
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 12.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-03 11:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, gatehouse
Open for review.
Tekeli Mehmet Paşa Mosque 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2015-05-03 14:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Tekeli Mehmet Paşa Mosque, Antalya, Turkey (exterior) North view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Picture have lens distortion, the tower isn't straight. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Bgag (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eriphia verrucosa male 2009 G5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2015-05-03 20:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Eriphia verrucosa (warty crab, yellow crab), frontal view
Used in:
en:Eriphia verrucosa and some other
Reason:
alive animal in wild, geocoded and most illustrative -- George Chernilevsky talk

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nymphalis polychloros MHNT CUT 2013 3 13 Gratentour Male Dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-04 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Nymphalis polychloros mounted specimen, Male Dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Support. Criteria met, most illustrative in scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eglise Saint-Martin de Finhan - Plafond à Caisson.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-04 05:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Finhan - St. Martin's church - Coffering on ceiling

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Arezzo Campanile - Santa Maria della Pieve.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-04 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Maria della Pieve (Arezzo) - Campanile dalle cento buche

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Left side leaning in, see notes. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eriphia verrucosa male 2009 G1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2015-05-04 05:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Eriphia verrucosa (warty crab, yellow crab), dorsal view
Reason:

Alive animal in wild, geocoded and most illustrative.

Difference betveen male and female Eriphia verrucosa from dorsal side are not visible -- George Chernilevsky talk

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eriphia verrucosa male 2009 G2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2015-05-04 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Eriphia verrucosa (warty crab, yellow crab), male ventral view
Reason:
alive animal in wild, geocoded and only one in scope male ventral -- George Chernilevsky talk

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-04 09:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of St. Ignatius in Kłodzko

Symbol support vote.svg Support It is valued, interesting combo with moon. I see first time f/9.5.--Mile (talk) 19:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 08.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-04 09:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of St. Ignatius in Kłodzko, altar
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 11.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-04 10:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, tented roof
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 26.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-04 11:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, crucifixion group at the church

best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 14.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-04 11:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Dzikowiec, outbuilding, exposure from SE
Open for review.
2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 15.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-04 11:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Former evangelical church, now Museum of the Sowiogórska Land in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie, main entrance
Open for review.
Cologne Main Station May 2015.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2015-05-04 15:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Köln Hauptbahnhof - Bahnsteighalle as seen from the N using central perspective

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Station Äußere Kanalstraße.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2015-05-04 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Cologne underground station Äußere Kanalstraße: platform

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kioconus tribblei tribblei 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-04 18:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Conus tribblei ssp. tribblei (Tribble's Cone), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidatesEdit

La Petite Parisienne (Knossos, main palace)Edit

   
The Parisian, fresco, Knossos, Greece.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-16 15:49 (UTC)
Scope:
La Petite Parisienne (Knossos, main palace)
Reason:
Famous fresco from ancient Greece. It even has its own article in 6 languages: en:La Parisienne (fresco). -- Yann (talk)

Image very useful, unique and highly representative of this famous fresco. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
La Parisienne Cnossos archmus Heraklion.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-04-05 10:35 (UTC)
Scope:
La Petite Parisienne (Knossos main palace)
Used in:
de:Knossos
Reason:
The best we have, IMO, of this extraordinary fragment of a minoan fresco, found in Knossos main palace by en:Arthur Evans. ca. 1500 BCE. now in Archaeological Museum of Heraklion, geocoded in the "institution" template. -- Jebulon (talk)

There is already a VI in scope (File:The Parisian, fresco, Knossos, Greece.jpg), but this is bigger. Symbol support vote.svg Support --C messier (talk) 11:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

  • And mine is for real, picture of the original taken by me, not a scanned copy from a book. Anyway, it is not the good procedural way to do, I have to go to MVR, but I don't remember how to do... Somebody could help, please ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus:, à l'aide, STP !--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportJebulon I overwrite my version of the picture, I think now the colors are more natural, if you do not like it restore your.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you very much Jacek for interest and support. I'm sorry, but I've reverted to my version. I find it better and more like what I've seen. This is a very old painting (more than 3000 years), and it is pale and not so much contrasted. Thanks again.--Jebulon (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes I agree the processing of the image is better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. The Parisian, fresco, Knossos, Greece.jpg: +1
2. La Parisienne Cnossos archmus Heraklion.jpg: +3 <--
=>
File:The Parisian, fresco, Knossos, Greece.jpg: Declined 
File:La Parisienne Cnossos archmus Heraklion.jpg: Promoted

Yann (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Sundial in First High School in KłodzkoEdit

   
2014 Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-02-25 12:43 (UTC)
Scope:
First High School in Kłodzko, sundial

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
2015 Zegar słoneczny, Zespół Szkół Ogólnokształcących w Kłodzku.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-27 22:44 (UTC)
Scope:
First High School in Kłodzko, sundial
Reason:
This image is sharper, has better frame and is showing a sundial with a more natural perspective. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC) -- Jacek Halicki (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Doris DayEdit

   
Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-26 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Doris Day

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC) --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg: -1<--
2. Day-midnightlace.jpg: +5 
=>
File:Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg: Declined <--
File:Day-midnightlace.jpg: Promoted 

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Day-midnightlace.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-27 10:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Doris Day

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Studio shot, so no geocoding. Yann (talk) 10:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This picture is better. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't like her films, but the picture is okay. --Palauenc05 (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 20:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The better image Liam987 (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg: -1
2. Day-midnightlace.jpg: +5 <--
=>
File:Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg: Declined 
File:Day-midnightlace.jpg: Promoted <--

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Collegiate Church in TumEdit

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) 
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 <--
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. 
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted<--
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927Edit

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 <--
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. 
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien MitteEdit

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Valle de los CaídosEdit

   
Valle de los caidos by forcy-cruz y basilica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Under MVR.--Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would vote for this image if the perspective was corrected. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 10:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
SPA-2014-San Lorenzo de El Escorial-Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-12-10 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos (West)
Used in:
Valle de los Caídos

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : there's already a VI of this site with a similar orientation. Although this one is better imo, it seems that a MVR is needed.--JLPC (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Grasleitenpasshütte, View from EastEdit

   
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, here I don't see that this place isn't too adventurous. –10:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte ganz.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

New valued image set nominationsEdit

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidatesEdit