Commons:Valued image candidates

This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status, and image sets for valued image set (VIS) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image or a set of images for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Adding a new nomination (set)Edit

Step 1: Choose a set name, and type that into this box after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname. Then click on the "Create new set nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VISC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate set towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/Set candidate list (under the heading "New valued image set nominations"). Click here, and add your set at the bottom of the page using this format:

 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/......}}
 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname}}

and save the set candidate list.

RenominationEdit

Declined VICs and VISCs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs and VISCs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs and VISCs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an image or a set of imagesEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates and the valued image set candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image or image set is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria (and the set criteria if appropriate). The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image or set which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images/sets which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

For sets, see also the Set criteria.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
11080 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
9008 (81.3%) 
Undecided
  
769 (6.9%) 
Declined
  
1303 (11.8%) 


New valued image nominationsEdit

   
Retrato ecuestre del General Joaquin Crespo. 1897.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) on 2014-04-15 15:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Retrato ecuestre del General Joaquin Crespo by Arturo Michelena
Reason:
Best in scope --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 15:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC) -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk)
Open for review.
Prestolee aqueduct panorama.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-04-15 16:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Prestolee Aqueduct south view
Used in:
cy:Prestolee, en:Manchester Bolton & Bury Canal, en:Prestolee, en:Prestolee Aqueduct, pl:Prestolee

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Leonardo Da Vinci - Vergine delle Rocce (Louvre).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Angelus(talk) on 2014-04-15 23:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre)
Reason:
The best image of the the Virgin of the Rocks (sometimes the Madonna of the Rocks). This version, generally considered the prime version, is the earlier of two paintings by Leonardo da Vinci, of the same subject, and of a composition which is identical except for several significant details. It hangs in The Louvre in Paris. -- Angelus(talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Crown Queens Bavaria Schatzkammer Residenz Munich.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-04-15 23:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Crown of the Queens of Bavaria, photograph.
Reason:
New in "Commons", alone in scope. This is the crown of the queens of Bavaria, between 1806 and 1918. It was made in Paris, by the jewelers of Napoleon, as the bavarian electorate was erected into a kingdom by him, after the fall of the german Holy Roman Empire. I think it has a kind of educational and historical value, and a good technical quality. Therefore I've also nominated it in FPC. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Angelus(talk) 01:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Malacosoma castrense MHNT CUT 2011 0 446 Female L'Argentière-la-Bessée.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-16 05:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Malacosoma castrense (Ground Lackey), mounted specimen, female

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Castelginest - Le Parc Mauvezin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-16 05:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Castelginest, Haute-Garonne France. Parc Mauvezin. Northwest exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-04-16 12:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Organ of Göttweig Abbey church
Used in:
de:Stift Göttweig

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Paris Mairie XIIIe façade 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-04-16 13:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Paris XIIIe arrondissement, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
St georges church carrington greater manchester.png
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-04-16 21:07 (UTC)
Scope:
St George's Church, Carrington south view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Franz Silberer Hof Wien Kardinal Nagel Platz DSC 7219w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-04-16 22:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Franz-Silberer-Hof, SW view
Used in:

Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Landstraße

Liste der Wiener Gemeindebauten/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zethalia zelandica 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-04-17 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Zethalia zelandica (Wheel Snail), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Primula margotae (x) 'Garryarde Guinevere' 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-04-17 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Garryarde Guinevere|Primula x margotae|Garryarde Guinevere flowers
Open for review.
Merops persicus MHNT ZOO 2010 11 161 Arys Kazakhstan.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-17 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Merops persicus(Blue-cheeked Bee-eater), eggs

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Musée des Augustin, l'aile Darcy - Viollet-le-duc.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-17 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Musée des Augustin, l'aile Darcy - Viollet-le-duc, Toulouse. Southwest exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gravelines beffroi trois quarts.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Velvet (talk) on 2014-04-17 11:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Belfry of Gravelines, France (SW view)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope.--JLPC (talk) 15:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nev1 (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Paris Parc Bercy Maison du jardinage&massifs 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-04-17 15:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Greenhouse of Parc de Bercy (Paris), south exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ordre de Saint-Hubert Grand Collier Schatzkammer Munich.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-04-17 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Collar of the bavarian Order of Saint Hubert. Detail. Photograph.
Used in:
fr:Ordre de Saint-Hubert (Bavière)
Reason:
We have two or three view of this collar in the category, some showing the whole object. But, as all the links are identical, I think we have here a sufficient image. This version is far much better and detailed than any other for the moment. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ordre de Saint-Hubert plaque Schatzkammer Munich.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-04-17 17:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Order of Saint Hubert, royal star. Photograph.
Used in:
fr:Ordre de Saint-Hubert (Bavière)
Reason:
Unique in "Commons" among other stars of this chivalric Order, this royal jewel shows in detail the medal. Best in scope IMO. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nev1 (talk) 22:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Narodowy Teatr Dramatyczny w Ułan Bator.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-04-17 18:26 (UTC)
Scope:
National Drama Theatre in Ulan Bator, Mongolia.
Used in:
en:Architecture of Mongolia, ru:Архитектура Монголии

isn't this one better ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this image is the best one in scope, although the cars are slightly distracting. However, the billboard on the other picture is distracting much more. Good thing also is that the sign with the name of the theatre is visible here. Jan Kameníček (talk) 15:54, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ashton War Memorial 01 (crop).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-04-17 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Ashton-under-Lyne War Memorial south view
Used in:
en:Ashton-under-Lyne

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Johannesgasse 26 Irakisce Botschaft DSC 9001w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-04-17 23:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Palais Larisch von Moennich in Vienna, East view
Used in:
Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Innere Stadt/Hi–K

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 23:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xanthogaleruca luteola MHNT Profil.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-18 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Xanthogaleruca luteola (Elm-leaf beetle) side view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Launaguet - Église Saint-Barthélemy - Abside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-18 05:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Launaguet - Apse of the church Saint-Barthélemy

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Midland Hotel west, Manchester.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-04-18 11:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Midland Hotel, Manchester SW view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment  : Good but would you, please, complete the scope with "facade" or "SW (NE...) view". Thanks

Good point, done. Nev1 (talk) 14:08, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK now. --JLPC (talk) 08:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Paris Rue Alphand depuis R des 5-Diamants 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-04-18 13:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue Alphand, as seen from rue des Cinq-Diamants, Paris, 13th arr.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Neutering museum in Komňa.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jan Kameníček (talk) on 2014-04-18 15:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Neutering museum in Komňa, exterior
Used in:
Obydlí zvěrokleštiče v Komni, Seznam kulturních památek v okrese Uherské Hradiště, Seznam českých muzeí
Reason:
Exterior of a house in Komňa, the Czech Republic, where a person practising neutering (a vanished craft nowadays) used to live. The house has a status of a protected cultural monument of the Czech Republic. Nowadays there is a neutering museum inside. -- Jan Kameníček (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 08:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nev1 (talk) 23:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Manchester Cathedral.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-04-18 18:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Manchester Cathedral aerial view
Used in:
de:Kathedrale von Manchester, en:Architecture of Manchester, en:Controversy over the use of Manchester Cathedral in Resistance: Fall of Man, en:Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester, es:Controversia sobre el uso de la Catedral de Mánchester en Resistance: Fall of man, es:Catedral de Manchester, eu:Manchester, pl:Manchester, xmf:მანჩესტერი

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in the scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Theodoxus prevostianus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-04-19 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Theodoxus prevostianus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cydalima perspectalis carterpillar.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-19 08:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Cydalima perspectalis (Box Tree Moth) carterpillar

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Et très beau ! (tu couperais pas le bout de feuille, à gauche , des fois ?)--Jebulon (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Building 9 place of President Thomas Wilson, Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-04-19 08:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Building 9 place of President Thomas Wilson, Toulouse, facade.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Saint-Bonnet-de-Four - 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2014-04-19 08:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint-Bonnet-de-Four, South side view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Express Building Manchester.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-04-19 11:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Daily Express Building, Manchester, façade

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Boulogne-Bill Musée A-Kahn Le palmarium 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-04-19 16:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Palmarium of musée Abert_Kahn, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
Reason:
Best in (small) scope. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree. Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tilly Feldherrnhalle Munich.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-04-19 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Johannes t'Serclaes, count of Tilly, statue, Feldherrnhalle, Munich.
Used in:
fr:Jean t'Serclaes, comte de Tilly, en:Johann Tserclaes, Count of Tilly
Reason:
Not a perfect one, but surprisingly it could be the best in the category, IMO. Used for "refreshing" too old pictures in articles. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope and very useful --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Robin Ince - EdSciFest 2014.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vera (talk) on 2014-04-19 22:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Robin Ince
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. Nev1 (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Romiley - Chadkirk Chapel.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-04-19 23:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Chadkirk Chapel
Used in:
en:Chadkirk Chapel, en:Grade II* listed buildings in Greater Manchester, zh:斯托克波特都市自治市
Open for review.
Cominella glandiformis 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-04-20 05:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Cominella glandiformis (Mud Whelk), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Joydeep Talk 08:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bauhinia acuminata plantlet 20042014.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Joydeep Talk on 2014-04-20 08:32 (UTC)
Scope:
2 weeks old plantlet of Bauhinia acuminata (Kanchan)
Open for review.

Closed valued image candidatesEdit

Most valued reviewsEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR has to be in the discussed state, while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

ScopeEdit

   
Urban Surfer1.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2013-08-12 06:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Eisbach surfingin Munich
Used in:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisbach

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Eisbach Surfer3.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2014-04-20 09:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Eisbach surfingin Munich
Reason:
Superior to my earlier Eisbach picture which already has been promoted to VI -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)
Open for review.

Closed Most Valued ReviewsEdit

Closed MVRs

   
Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014 B.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Paris 16 (talk) on 2014-04-14 17:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side
Open for review.
Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Paris 16 (talk) on 2014-04-14 17:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side
Open for review.
Hotel-de-Salm-Paris.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Paris 16 (talk) on 2012-04-04 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Okay, the other side is already promoted, should be added "exterior" for buildings.

Okay Archaeodontosaurus, comme tu veux.--Paris 16 (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good with the new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

New valued image set nominationsEdit

View promotion
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-02-20 20:39 (UTC)
Description: A complete typeset of United States Silver Certificates.
First issued in 1878, United States silver certificates were in use until 1968 but are still redeemable as legal tender. The nominated set contains an example of every type (design) issued. The 1878 $50 and $1,000 are represented by colored-seal proofs from a Bureau of Engraving and Printing specimen book presented to John Sherman during his tenure as Secretary of the Treasury. There are only two issued examples of the $50 known to exist and the $1,000 is unknown in issued form. The 1878 $500 is unique. Images of the 1878 $500 and $1,000 are missing from most major numismatic reference books. The silver certificate article has been significantly re-worked and referenced to accommodate this complete set of images, which is also currently nominated at English Wikipedia FPC
.
VISC of:
Banknotes of the United States
Used in:
Silver Certificate (all), single or multiples images on: United States one-dollar bill,United States two-dollar bill,United States five-dollar bill,United States ten-dollar bill,Educational Series,List of United States Presidents on currency,Stephen Decatur,Edward Everett,Robert Fulton,Thomas A. Hendricks,Daniel Manning,William L. Marcy,James Monroe,Robert Morris,Running Antelope,Sioux,Martha Washington, and William Windom; fr:Silver Certificate, ru:Серебряный_сертификат (США), sv:Silvercertifikat, ru:Один доллар США (банкнота), fa: اسکناس_دو_دلاری_ایالات_متحده_آمریکا, zh: 2美元纸币
Symbol support vote.svg Support : great and useful work imo. --JLPC (talk) 08:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
View promotion
Nominated by:
J. Lunau (talk) on 2014-02-24 13:19 (UTC)
Description: set of animations, showing yoga exercises "The Five Tibetan Rites".
VISC of:
The Five Tibetan Rites
Used in:
Five Tibetan Rites, Pět tibeťanů, Fünf Tibeter, Cinq tibétains, Vijf Tibetanen
*Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope usefull and very suggestive animations!--LuminitaM (talk) 18:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. J. Lunau (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
View promotion
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-03-02 03:42 (UTC)
Description: The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth first issued banknotes in 1794 under the authority of Tadeusz Kościuszko, less than one year before Poland was partitioned out of existence (regaining independence in 1918). Higher denomination 500 and 1,000 Zlotych notes were issued but are extremely rare. Images are courtesy of the National Numismatic Collection at the Smithsonian Institution. These images will be worked into an article.
VISC of:
Banknotes of Poland (1794)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Great collection! Very rare and useful. Halavar (talk) 10:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-03-19 17:42 (UTC)
Description: The two forms of Sydaphera spengleriana (Spengler's Nutmeg)
VISC of:
Sydaphera spengleriana (Spengler's Nutmeg), Shell
*Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good and useful pictures. -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
View promotion
Nominated by:
Angelus(talk) on 2014-03-26 01:16 (UTC)
Description: Coat of Arms and flag of Apulia.
VISC of:
Symbols of Apulia
Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Angelus(talk) 01:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)


Closed valued image set candidatesEdit

Last modified on 21 October 2013, at 07:13