Comment This facade is beautiful and photography very hard to do. But there is too much deformation. There should be two images with a 10mm. We can put it on our cameras, which automatically manages the reduction of fields. I did not take with me this year. It's a good challenge --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Large sensors can not fall below 24mm. If you place a 10mm lens, viewfinder you have the image framed by a red rectangle shows the area that you lose. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with the argument of Archaeodontosaurus, but support anyway, because for me photo meets all VI creteria, especially for me it is best in this scope at the moment -- J. Lunau (talk) 12:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I renominates the picture on the ground that I believe opposition is not valid according to # 3 of the criteria: "Provided that the image complies with the above, it is not a valid ground of opposition that it would be easy to create a better one. A VI is the best available image of its type on Commons, not the best that can be conceived of." cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
