Commons:Valued image candidates/Polyptyc last judgment.jpg

Polyptyc last judgment.jpg

{{VIC |subpage=Polyptyc last judgment.jpg |image=Polyptyc last judgment.jpg |date=2011-01-05 23:56 (UTC) |nominator=Stephanemartin (talk) |scope=Polyptyque du Jugement dernier by Rogier van der Weyden |orientation=landscape |status=declined |reason= |review= Comment At first sight, the nominated reproduction looks very spectacular but what do you think about competition in MVR with this one: ?--MrPanyGoff 21:19, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

that's exactly the question ;-) --Stephanemartin (talk) 22:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm not sure about the scope. Maybe it should be specified by adding the name of the artist in brackets.--MrPanyGoff 12:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polyptyque du Jugement dernier is a subcategory of Rogier van der Weyden. I agree it's somewhat unprecise, but it was already created like that when i posted my photo. --Stephanemartin (talk) 13:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would suggest to amend the scope like that: "Polyptyque du Jugement dernier by Rogier van der Weyden". --Myrabella (talk) 12:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

done --Stephanemartin (talk) 00:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment come on mates, it shouldnt be too hard to tell for experts like you... criteria 2 to 6 are fullfilled for each photo. you just have to tell which one is the most valuable. good points for this photo : the photo has been taken on the restored painting, and was taken directly in the beaune hotel-dieu, in the conditions the cultural officer wanted it to be exposed. i _think_ the vivid colors are appropriate to render the subject properly (heck, end of the world should be vivid !). bad points : geometry is not perfect. good points for the other photo : geometry correctness is better. but the painting shows some white traces on the vertical middle line. --Stephanemartin (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know the place very well, and I tried to take pictures of each wooden board, but unsuccessfuly, due to the light. It is impossible for an amateur to take a decent shot of this marvel in "normal" conditions. That's why I'm really lenient. But I think this one, even restored, with better colors, is not good enough: the details are shown better in the other version. Sorry, only my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well i hope next time they will allow me to enter with a tripod :-{ --Stephanemartin (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't become disheartened Stephanemartin. Next time you'll win ;) Actually, at first I would support your version but why you didn't make a little bit perspective correction. --MrPanyGoff 14:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Polyptyc last judgment.jpg: -1
2. Rogier van der Weyden 001.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Polyptyc last judgment.jpg: Declined.
File:Rogier van der Weyden 001.jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

}}