Commons talk:Tekniska museet
Latest comment: 3 years ago by ALLvet in topic Errors in image titles and descriptions in the Sigurd Curman collection
Errors in image titles and descriptions in the Sigurd Curman collection edit
Thank you for making these fantastic images available! Here is a list of errors that have been identified on de.wikipedia:
- File:S-t Petri från Holstenstrasse, Lübeck - TEK - TEKA0116654.tif wrong title and description; this is St. Marien from Schüsselbuden --Concord (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:Hus vid An der Obertrave i Lübecks - TEK - TEKA0117917.tif wrong title and description; this is An der Untertrave --Concord (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:Gatuvy från München - TEK - TEKA0116980.tif wrong title and description; this is Hannoversch Münden [1] --Concord (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:Untere Sandgasse in Bamberg mit Blick auf die Elisabethenkirche - TEK - TEKA0118337.tiff already corrected, this is Würzburg, not Lübeck --Concord (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:Gatumotiv från Berlin - TEK - TEKA0118631.tif - not an error, but has been identified as Erstes Romanisches Haus (see categories) --Concord (talk) 19:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Concord: A big thanks to you and the German community! I have corrected the descriptions and requested that the files with wrong titles be renamed. We have also forwarded your corrections to the museum.
- A question: I have noticed the category Category:Photographs by Sigurd Curman - Hann. München has been created. Is Hann. München the same as Hann. Münden?
- Thank you again for your help! --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 12:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- You are welcome! And no Hann. München is not the same as Hann. Münden (actually, the first name does not exist). That's a typo in the category name. I moved it to Category:Photographs by Sigurd Curman - Hann. Münden. Thanks for spotting it. --Concord (talk) 12:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Concord: I wish to express my Museums gratitude for your corrections. We will enter the changes into our database as well. You are always welcome to send us an inquiry via the source-link for each image when you find more misinterpretations. @Alicia Fagerving (WMSE): thanks for correcting, and a tip: it is Untertrave (not Un-d-ertrave) in TEKA0117917. ALLvet (talk) 08:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)