File:A minimalist paper evaluation function - fncom-06-00079-g007.jpeg
A_minimalist_paper_evaluation_function_-_fncom-06-00079-g007.jpeg (603 × 439 pixels, file size: 105 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary edit
DescriptionA minimalist paper evaluation function - fncom-06-00079-g007.jpeg |
English: A minimalist paper evaluation function. As one possible general-purpose PEF, I suggest the “scitureH” index, which is an average of at least eight scientists’ desired-impact ratings (in impact-factor units), weighted by the scientists’ H-indices. Such an index could serve to provide ongoing open evaluation of papers published under the current system. An icon summarizing the index and its precision (left) could be added to online representations of papers (right), either by the publishers themselves or by independent web-portals providing access to the literature. |
Date | |
Source | Kriegeskorte N (2012) Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 6:79. doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00079 |
Author | Nikolaus Kriegeskorte |
Licensing edit
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:19, 14 November 2012 | 603 × 439 (105 KB) | Daniel Mietchen (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | niko |
---|---|
Date and time of data generation | 23:57, 30 September 2012 |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows |
File change date and time | 08:58, 12 October 2012 |
Color space | sRGB |
Date and time of digitizing | 23:57, 30 September 2012 |
Date metadata was last modified | 14:28, 12 October 2012 |
Unique ID of original document | xmp.did:122E714E120DE211A840E80E49CC109F |
IIM version | 112 |