Identifier: confederatestate12conf (find matches)
Title: Confederate States medical & surgical journal
Year: 1864 (1860s)
Authors: Confederate States of America. Surgeon-General's Office
Subjects: United States Medicine, Military American Civil War Military Medicine
Publisher: Richmond, Va. : (Ayres & Wade)
Contributing Library: Francis A. Countway Library of Medicine
Digitizing Sponsor: Open Knowledge Commons and the National Endowment for the Humanities

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
d by Surgeon E. S. Gail-lard. 6. Case of Gun-Shol Wound of Kidney—Reco-very—by Assistant-Surgeon R. J. Perry. CONFEDERATE STATES HOSPITAL REPORTS 75 Report of Wounded treated in Field Hospital of HindmansDivision, Army of Tennessee, after the battle of Chick-arnauga, by Chief Surgeon Carlyle Terry. EDITORIAL AND MISCELLANEOUS 77 Amputation, Disarticulation and Resection Statistics of theConfederate States Army. The Prospect before Us. CHRONICLE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE 78 Comparative Results of Primary, Intermediate and Secon-dary Amputations, translated from the French of La*gouest, by H. L. Thomas, M. p. rtV-...., ^~r»w».Ww,j.)r.»T..,.,.».,■ ,g, ,itrm,,vvlr„.„f,w,nr¥TrV-ll* I w»inw)l.»)pwiH i ;;■ ■ -; *■- I I ■ ■■ »» - -.» ■ ——W-.1 ; , ; ■....., r-« ■■■»!■■ I ■■ ■ ■. !»!—!■ I.l! COltfl^IEID-EIR^A/rE STATES MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL, PRICE, $10 A YEAR IN ADVANCE, COT^ITE.DER^TE STATES
Text Appearing After Image:
OL. I. RICHMOND, JCISE; 1864. No. 6. ORIGINAL COMMUNICATIONS. ART. X. — Prophylactic Effects of Quinine. By SAMUELLogan, P. A C. S. The following table was compiled with the view of enablingthe writer to arrive at some definite conclusion as to the pro-phylactic power of quinine. The items were collected, eitherby himself or the medical officer in charge, to whose cheerfulco-operation he ig much indebted. It will be observed thatin no single camp was the agent unanimously adopted_; inmany, indec:). its use was resorted to by a minority only. Sofar as my object was concerned, this was rather fortunate thanotherwi.se. as it lias enabled mo to compare the results amGngthose situated under the same identical circumstances in all par-ticulars, except theuse orueglectof the agent whose effect weareinvestigating. I would call attention to the fact, that muchmore importance should be attached to the results developedunder these circumstances, than when the experiments aremade with separate

Note About Images