Wikimedia Commons

File:Harper's New Monthly Magazine Volume 104 December 1901 to May 1902 (1902) (14596597108).jpg

Original file ‎(1,814 × 1,208 pixels, file size: 762 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary edit

Description
English:

Identifier: harpersnew0104various (find matches)
Title: Harper's New Monthly Magazine Volume 104 December 1901 to May 1902
Year: 1902 (1900s)
Authors: various
Subjects:
Publisher: New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers
Contributing Library: Brigham Young University-Idaho, David O. McKay Library
Digitizing Sponsor: Brigham Young University-Idaho

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
rthenon sculptures, is of considera-ble value. For while in the case ofthe male statuette we luckily possess ex-tant figures from the Parthenon withwhich we can compare it and demon-strate such dependence, it is not so inthe case of the female figure, the proto-type of which among the Parthenonstatues is not extant. But proof of sucha relationship is abundant. (1.) The two marble statuettes are ofthe same uncommon dimensions. (2.) The marble statuettes of such un-common dimensions came together, andwere thus in all probability found to-gether. (3.) Because it is possible for us toconfront the male statuette with theKephissos, we know that it is in itsorigin a pedimental figure. But, apartfrom its presumptive relation to thisstatuette, the female- figure is evidentlypart of a pedimental group—the statu-ette itself, apart from its being a copy ofa larger pedimental statue. For notonly is the flat, perpendicular back withthe more unfinished modelling of the 18 HAKPERS MONTHLY MAGAZINE.
Text Appearing After Image:
among Two Marble Statuettes from Eleusis, with the Dresden Statuette between them drapery indicative of this, but the pre-cise and defined position which the per-pendicular back assigns to the figure inthe front view — so that the spectatormust see her from one aspect—makesit, I venture to say, a certainty that thestatuette never was a single, independent figure, which, if I am right, would have —in fact,the extant statuesof the fifth centuryB.C.—we have no-thing to go by forthe treatment ofthe nude femalefigure, the pose andgeneral composi-tion, the modellingof the drapery inthe lower part ofthe figure, and thecharacter andquality of these,would of them-selves have assignedthe original fromwhich this statuetteis copied to the At-tic art of the fifthcentury B.C., and to the pedimental statuesof the Parthenon as its closest analogy. Fortunately the female figure is bet-ter preserved than the male statuette.It also looks as if the artist had put moreloving care into this beautif

Note About Images

Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Date
Source

https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/14596597108/

Author Internet Archive Book Images
Permission
(Reusing this file)		 At the time of upload, the image license was automatically confirmed using the Flickr API. For more information see Flickr API detail.
Volume
InfoField
vol. 104
Flickr tags
InfoField
  • bookid:harpersnew0104various
  • bookyear:1902
  • bookdecade:1900
  • bookcentury:1900
  • bookauthor:various
  • bookpublisher:New_York__Harper___Brothers_Publishers
  • bookcontributor:Brigham_Young_University_Idaho__David_O__McKay_Library
  • booksponsor:Brigham_Young_University_Idaho
  • bookleafnumber:33
  • bookcollection:family_history_library
  • bookcollection:brighamyounguniversityidaho
  • bookcollection:americana
Flickr posted date
InfoField
30 July 2014

Licensing edit

This image was taken from Flickr's The Commons. The uploading organization may have various reasons for determining that no known copyright restrictions exist, such as:
  1. The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired;
  2. The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions;
  3. The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or
  4. The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

More information can be found at https://flickr.com/commons/usage/.

Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Internet Archive Book Images at https://flickr.com/photos/126377022@N07/14596597108. It was reviewed on 12 September 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the No known copyright restrictions.

12 September 2015

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current03:25, 12 September 2015Thumbnail for version as of 03:25, 12 September 20151,814 × 1,208 (762 KB)Fæ (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{subst:chc}} {{information |description={{en|1=<br> '''Identifier''': harpersnew0104various ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insource%3A%2Fharpersnew0104va...

You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Harper%27s_New_Monthly_Magazine_Volume_104_December_1901_to_May_1902_(1902)_(14596597108).jpg&oldid=681996131"