File:Region-beta paradox.png
Original file (1,201 × 901 pixels, file size: 12 KB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Summary edit
DescriptionRegion-beta paradox.png |
English: The region-beta paradox: a person prefers to walk (at 3 miles per hour) if distances are less than a mile, and to bike (15 miles per hour) for longer distances. Despite the remoteness of points in region beta, they will be reached faster than most points in the nearby region alpha.
This was used by Gilbert et al. to illustrate the non-monotonic effect of psychological processes on speed of recovery from an aversive stimulus. Based on figure 1 in: Daniel T. Gilbert, Matthew D. Lieberman, Carey K. Morewedge, and Timothy D. Wilson. (2004). The Peculiar Longevity of Things Not So Bad. Psychological Science. Vil 15:1, pp. 14-19 |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Anders Sandberg |
Licensing edit
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:36, 10 October 2013 | 1,201 × 901 (12 KB) | Anders Sandberg (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 59.06 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 59.06 dpc |
File change date and time | 17:26, 10 October 2013 |
Software used | |
Date and time of digitizing |
|