File:Total amount of gold and hybrid article processing charges (APCs) per publisher per year.png
Original file (3,200 × 1,510 pixels, file size: 241 KB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Summary edit
DescriptionTotal amount of gold and hybrid article processing charges (APCs) per publisher per year.png |
English: "Based on APC list prices and OA status, we estimate that the scientific community paid the five big academic publishers included in our analysis $1.06 billion in OA publication fees ($612.5 million for gold, and $448.3 million for hybrid OA), for 505,903 articles published in 6,252 journals between 2015 and 2018.
The number of OA articles and APCs increased annually over the 4-year period from $201.5 million for 91,375 articles in 2015 to $335.4 million for 153,746 articles in 2018 (Figure 1). According to our estimate, the largest amount of OA fees was obtained by Springer Nature ($589.7 million), followed by Elsevier ($221.4 million), Wiley ($114.3 million), Taylor & Francis ($76.8 million), and Sage ($31.6 million). Of the OA articles analyzed, 69.5% of articles were gold and 30.5% were hybrid, with a slight increase in hybrid articles from 29.0% in 2015 to 32.4% in 2018." The study was featured in 2023 in science |
Date | |
Source | https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/4/4/778/118070/The-oligopoly-s-shift-to-open-access-How-the-big |
Author |
Authors of the study: Leigh-Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias, Marc-André Simard, Philippe Mongeon, Stefanie Haustein |
Licensing edit
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:24, 4 March 2024 | 3,200 × 1,510 (241 KB) | Prototyperspective (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Leigh-Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias, Marc-André Simard, Philippe Mongeon, Stefanie Haustein from https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/4/4/778/118070/The-oligopoly-s-shift-to-open-access-How-the-big with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 37.79 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 37.79 dpc |