File talk:Dokdo 080628 2.jpg

@Caspian Blue

Please see File talk:Dokdo 080628.jpg. Thx. --Valentim (talk) 22:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

To User:Valentim

Please see the below. Thanks.

User_talk:Valentim#Your linking of Korean editors' contribution to your user page on German Wikipedia File talk:Dokdo 080628.jpg#Response to User:Valentim --Caspian blue 23:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Deleting of information

Hello Historiographer, you tried to delete information, especially to erase the de-description line [1], [2], [3]. Could you please give a valid reason based on Common rules why you did that edits which seemed to be a kind of vandalism? Just let me remind you that Commons is a multilingual project... Greetings --Valentim (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Your edit version is very discordance. You have biased Japanese nationalism awareness. Whu do you denied the fact that Dokdo is administered by the Republic of Korea?--Historiographer (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean, or you missed the point. This is not Wikipedia, we do not write (that deeply) about such matters here on Commons.

By the way: The content of de- and en-description line you deleted/changed was a copy from de- and en-wikipedia first sentence (see here and here); Why didn't you complain there? So far I can see there is no complaint from you there ([4], [5]). If there is really something wrong with the content of these two lines please despute them there. After Wikipedia-content changed you may add the new sentence here on Commons without facing problems.

Please also note, that deleting of language description lines is against what commons stands for and against its will. --Valentim (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Former version restored (over 5 days of no answer). --Valentim (talk) 18:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)