Talk:Church

Redundant with Category:Churches - in my opinion content should be moved to "Churches" (and possibly subcategories be made like Belgian churches, Chilean churches..., or something like that) Xauxa 18:03, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• I believe the current consensus is to have the redundancy between categories and static pages, because while yes, all of this can be found under Category:Churches, you can't easily search test on Category pages. Am removing the redundant tag from this page. Kevyn 14:52, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Still can´t see why it is necessary to have one page called "Church" and one page called "Churches". Xauxa 23:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Ok Swedish churches

I am considering moving several Swedish churches to the article Swedish churches; there is no point in listing every singly Swedish church on this page. --Fred Chess 2 July 2005 00:13 (UTC)

Right, do it… --Ikar.us July 2, 2005 07:02 (UTC)

I can't do it right now, when I click on "article" tab above nothing happens --Fred Chess 3 July 2005 00:58 (UTC)

How about dividing by continent?

This page is getting very large. How about we do the same as in:

• Tram
  • Tram - Africa
  • Tram - America
  • Tram - Asia
  • Tram - Australasia
  • Tram - Europe

Like this:

• Church
  • Church - Africa
  • Church - America
  • Church - Asia
  • Church - Australasia
  • Church - Europe

--OsvaldoGago 2 July 2005 23:11 (UTC)

It is okey, but America perhaps should be divided into South America and North America right from the start. Xauxa 23:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

More church images of other

Hi.

Most of photographs of churches are European and American. Any ideas how to make african, asian and australasian pages with more pictures? --OsvaldoGago 07:16, 11 July 2005 (UTC)