Template talk:PD-Gutenberg

"following text is predominantly displayed" - I presume this should read "prominently displayed" Rotational (talk) 10:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would assume so... AnonMoos (talk) 14:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

{{editprotected}}

✓ Done — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nominated for deletion edit

{{Editprotected}} Please add the following :

{{Delete
|reason= Not a valid PD template
|subpage=Template:PD-Gutenberg
|day=9
|month=June
|year=2010
}}

with "noinclude" ?

Teofilo (talk) 09:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  DoneKrinkletalk 22:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Link to The Full Project Gutenberg License is broken edit

In the template, there is a link to The Full Project Gutenberg License in Legalese (normative). However, this link appears to be broken. At the current time, this license can be viewed here. According to section 1.E.1 of The Full Project Gutenberg License in Legalese (normative), works that are distributed with the trademarked Project Gutenberg name must include certain text that begins with "This eBook is...". Another item of required content mentioned in the license is "active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License".

For replacing the broken link to The Full Project Gutenberg License in Legalese (normative), two possible links that come to mind are https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html#the-full-project-gutenberg-license-in-legalese-normative and https://www.gutenberg.org/license. Does anyone else have any thoughts on this issue? --Gazebo (talk) 07:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Return to "PD-Gutenberg" page.