Template talk:PD-US-no notice

Return to "PD-US-no notice" page.

UntitledEdit

Are all works tagged with this not in the public domain in the listed countries, or only those that have been published in those countries? --NE2 10:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

For a work to be separately copyrighted in the listed countries, yes I think they would have to have actually been published there. Of course, for proper confirmation each case would require research specific to that county's laws and to actually know whether the work was published there or not.--Pharos 16:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

PaintingsEdit

Hello,

This should be some explanation that this template doesn't apply to paintings. Yann 19:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Who says it doesn't apply to paintings? Sure it does. But almost all paintings of any significance from the 20th century have been published in catalogs, and these catalogs have had the notices of copyright.--Pharos 03:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Whether it applies to paintings or sculpture depends on the definition of "published" as it applies to those works. What does it mean for a painting to be published? Is a painting made in 1970, not marked with an explicit copyright notice, and held in a private collection in the public domain? I am skeptical that a court would see it that way. Tim Pierce (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

inclusiveEdit

  • Please add the word inclusive, so it says "1923 and 1977, inclusive, without". -Nard the Bard 19:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
OK, done.--Pharos (talk) 19:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed additionEdit

Subject to some of the exceptions listed at [1], I propose the following addition:

Note: there are special exceptions for single copies of artwork, works published without authorization of the copyright holder, and works for which only a small number of copies have no notice.

What do you think? Dcoetzee (talk) 00:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

PMAEdit

Could someone add a link or explanation of the meaning of "pma"? I had to ask at the English Wikipedia for an explanation (which was quite helpful), but surely it would make it easier for reusers to know that "pma" means "after the author's death". Nyttend (talk) 04:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree, the English version of this template should link to the Wikipedia page like so:
[[w:List of Latin phrases (P)#Post_mortem_auctoris|p.m.a.]]
but note that there are other translations of this template and that if the abbreviation p.m.a. is used on those translations, they also need to link to their Wikipedias' relevant articles (list of Latin phrases; section post mortem auctoris) and I don't thing [AFAICT] any of the Wikipedias in the languages this template is in (other than English) have the relevant article section (or in some cases the article itself), so those translations would probably have to just fully explain the term instead of just linking to an article. I think the "pma" needs periods (basic grammar) and the w: should be there in case the template is seen on, say, the English Wiktionary, because of this: [2] 207.65.109.10 10:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
English fixed.--Svgalbertian (talk) 17:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

A long lingering death or a short quick oneEdit

Why is it important that the author had a long lingering death, "Unless its author has died for several years,..." as opposed to a quick one? I think the template should read "Unless its author has been dead for several years,...". CambridgeBayWeather Talk 01:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

This is unnecessary detail here anyway. I propose simply: "It may not be in the public domain in [...]" Dcoetzee (talk) 01:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, at least Castro, Kim Jong-Il and Brezhnev died several times, so I guess their images are fair game. Possibly also Elvis and Mark Twain. :)
How about "It may not be in the public domain of other countries with conflicting copyright rules. See [this page] for further explanation of US copyright rules."? Franamax (talk) 03:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Small correction needed in the French translationEdit

Hi, the sentence "elle n'est pas dans le domaine public dans les pays ou régions qui n'applique pas..." should read "elle n'est pas dans le domaine public dans les pays ou régions qui n'appliquent pas" (since it's a plural). Thanks in advance. Alchemica (talk) 08:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

« N'hésite pas ! » ;-) -- Asclepias (talk) 02:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Request for additionEdit

{{editprotected}} Please add a notice/warning that this regulation only applies to work made by US citizens that's registered in the US or first published in the US. Maybe add a comment regarding movie trailers: They have to be solely US work, as soon as it incorporates foreign work or is from a US/foreign co-production this regulation only applies if the source material is also PD in the country of origin. --Denniss (talk)

I don't think so. US copyright law is very complicated -- the template is, by design, short, and cannot possible deal with all of the various ns and outs of the law.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Simplify wordingEdit

{{editprotected}}

Please change "in the countries or areas" to "in the jurisdictions", since "areas" is quite vague, and "jurisdictions" covers both countries and non-countries more simply. Nyttend (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done the English version.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

p.m.a.Edit

{{editprotected}}

The "p.m.a." needs to be applied consistantly. Please put the dots in for China or remove the dots for all of them. Sven Manguard (talk) 19:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

This is the wrong page. And the right one was not protected and it is now changed. -- RE rillke questions? 14:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Discussion regarding PD-US-no notice imagesEdit

There's a discussion over at the en:WP version of this template that uploaders using this template may be interested in reviewing. – JBarta (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

"further explanation" linkEdit

Until a few minutes ago this template and the counterpart at enwiki had identical last sentences but the "this page" links went to different places. Which link should we use? (also asking at enwiki) --Jeremyb (talk) 04:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Last modified on 23 October 2013, at 05:14