User:ComputerHotline/Archive 10

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-16 23-17-56-startrails-1-5f-9min-1d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Moonik 11:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-14 20-55-20-m45-19f-1.6s-13d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Oh starry, starry night. Mattbuck 22:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-14 20-53-50-orion-40f-1.6s-13d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Paint your palette blue and grey Mattbuck 22:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-14 20-49-10-jupi-venus-52f-1.6s-13d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Look out on a summer's day with eyes that know the darkness in my soul… Mattbuck 22:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-21 23-20-56-circumpolaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good choice of foreground. Nicely executed. My favorite of the series. --Saffron Blaze 14:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-21 21-58-06-m45-6f-60s-3d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Interesting. --Jkadavoor 06:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2012-03-14 21-42-55-file-etoiles-14f-2min-3d.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2012-03-14 21-42-55-file-etoiles-14f-2min-3d.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-16 22-02-35-startrails-4f-9min-1d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 18:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-25 00-26-31-uma-4fov-9f-5s-ISO640-72d-27o-ann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, well executed and very useful--Jebulon 15:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-24 21-15-43-lion-5fov-9f-5s-iso640-72d-27o-ann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, well executed and very useful--Jebulon 15:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-20 15-19-58-reduit-bosmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-16 22-22-42-startrails-3f-9min-1d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Love it, but what are the radial spikes? --Mattbuck 18:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC) In the sky, there are stars. --ComputerHotline 08:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-25 00-26-31-uma-4fov-9f-5s-ISO640-72d-27o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-25 19-39-30-conj-lune-jupi-12f-2.5s-8d-f5.6-iso200-42mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 07:38, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-03-21 21-34-00-startrails.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is the really long one at the bottom and the broken one at the top(different angle) really startrails? They look like aircraft contrails.--Gauravjuvekar 06:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC) It's startrails. --ComputerHotline 07:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
QI for me. --Kadellar 14:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-06 21-18-08-m45-venus-18f-13d-16o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-03 16-43-53-amaryllis-sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Holleday 18:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 09-38-34-electronique-15f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically ok, but lacks detailed description. --Smial 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 09-49-00-electronique-63f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically ok, but lacks detailed description. --Smial 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 09-54-15-electronique-51f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically ok, but lacks detailed description. --Smial 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 15-41-06-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 15-45-01-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good work. --Smial 10:42, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 15-47-40-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 16-09-58-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 16-46-31-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-27 07-19-41-nature.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK with me. Please add english description to all your QI candidates. --Iifar 11:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-02 14-47-19-batterie-nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect atmospheric photo. --Florstein 19:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-27 09-03-15-theatre-gallo-romain-mandeure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-27 08-49-35-theatre-gallo-romain-mandeure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-27 08-44-09-theatre-gallo-romain-mandeure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-02 15-54-25-boulangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some CA at the right, but still good. - A.Savin 23:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-11 14-10-42-sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 18:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-10 16-15-53-nymphe-feu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Morray 17:27, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-11 21-18-07-timelapse-nuages-belfort-47,651795-6,846655.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very inresting doc of cloud formation I believe QI --Moroder 15:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-10 14-38-07-agrion-elegant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-19-19-Salticus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-24 14-43-49-Coenagrion puella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-11-14-Panorpa communis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-10-08-Panorpa communis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-00-34-Pyrrhosoma nymphula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-29 12-45-57-cadenas-amour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 20:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-29 16-50-30-Porte mordelaise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 20:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

QI - Volucella edit

Please id your Volucella nominations on QI. They are most likely Volucella bombylans var. bombylans.  B.p. 11:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't know all species of insects. --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

identification des libellules edit

Salut, ComputerHotline. Je vous mercie pour l'identification des libellules. Vous pourrez peut-être pour aider à l'identification d'autres insectes de Baikonour. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-29 12-05-02-Notre-Dame-en-Saint-Melaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Any idea where? edit

Hi, do you have any idea where you took this photo?

 

It was probably near Belfort. I'd just like to know where it was, so I can put it in a more detailed category. Region or département would be helpful, if you can't remember the town. Kind Regards, --Stanzilla (talk) 15:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I've placed the template "location" in the page of the image. --ComputerHotline (talk) 06:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks you very much. :) You even categorized it, that's very nice.--Stanzilla (talk) 12:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-07 14-55-19-Cygnus-olor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-07 14-54-30-Cygnus-olor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-07 15-31-43-Lestes-sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 11:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-07 15-31-43-Lestes-sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-14 18-42-28-meeting-soc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The former minister of Interior is in focus, the present minister of Interior is not. QI nevertheless --Jebulon 13:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-07 15-32-02-Lestes-sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 16:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-04 14-34-01-volucelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-19 15-24-13-f-chat-lambert-rue-rempart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine with me. --Iifar 16:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-19 16-30-31-f-chat-lambert-arch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 16:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)