User:ComputerHotline/Archive 17

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-18 15-33-34-rosemontoise-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-18 15-35-41-rosemontoise-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:26, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-20 13-19-57-egl-st-georges-vesoul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-20 13-21-11-egl-st-georges-vesoul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-20 13-00-24-egl-st-georges-vesoul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-22 14-26-43-savoureuse-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and Q is OK. --NorbertNagel 17:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-22 16-21-35-verbote-serma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very very nice LE --The Photographer 17:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-22 16-18-20-piste-cycl-evette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some  Underexposed, but ok for me --The Photographer 17:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-20 14-06-21-lac-vesoul-vaivre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. very nice --Ralf Roletschek 21:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-51-06-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 12-58-30-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 10:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-04-18-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 09:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Photos

Bonjour, j'ai été agréablement surpris en voyant les magnifique photos que vous avez télécharger sur Commons, je parle notamment des photos du lac de Vaivre et des photos de la ville de Vesoul. Merci beaucoup pour les photos. J'espère en revoir plein d'autres sur Vesoul et sa région. Nerio9 (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Merci pour vos compliments. Mais je n'y retournerai pas de si tôt car j'y étais pour raison pro. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Je ne savais pas si il fallait que je vous demande l'autorisation mais j'ai utilisé quelque photos que vous avez pris du coté de Vesoul pour les mettre sur l'article en rapport avec Vesoul. Nerio9 (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-20-16-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments imho ok --Steinsplitter 16:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-39-59-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-55-53-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-22 16-15-53-piste-cycl-serma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: Please categorize...

Hello ComputerHotline. You are just right. In future I will try to do my best. Thanks for your advice.

Best Regards.

Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-51-28-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-02 13-48-58-ouv-monceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-01 15-02-43-bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 12-34-13-Durgeon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-57-31-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-57-58-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-48-36-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-15-23-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me --Grondin 15:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:F. Müllhaupt's Militarische & Verkehrs-Karte der Deutsch-Französischen Grenze...jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:F. Müllhaupt's Militarische & Verkehrs-Karte der Deutsch-Französischen Grenze...jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-04-01 14-33-55-cascade.jpg

Bonsoir,

J'ai pris sur moi de décrire la photographie en question en me basant sur les données GPS de ton fichier. Dis-moi ce que tu en penses. Cela permettra à ton fichier à être promu au rang d'image de qualité.-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → ^(Talk) 18:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Merci. J'ai corrigé une faute de frappe. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-08 13-07-43-porte-cochere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems good --Nino Verde 16:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-08 13-13-22-porte-cochere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems good for me --Nino Verde 16:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Deutsch-französische Grenzländer, mit genauer Einzeichnung der französischen Befestigungs-Anlagen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deutsch-französische Grenzländer, mit genauer Einzeichnung der französischen Befestigungs-Anlagen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-41-39-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. --Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-34-16-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-36-21-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-01 14-33-55-cascade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lacks description. Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)  Done in french, catalan, spanish, portuguese and english.--Grondin 18:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Lacks italian, polish, german, danish and klingon description, but still QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 12:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-01 14-21-25-cascade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lacks description. Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)  Done--Grondin 09:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 19:35, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-14 12-35-39-resine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-17 11-08-25-paon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-21 11-07-28-etamine-28f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp, good contrast, and depth of field.--Earth100 03:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-21 10-59-02-etamines-64f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay, as stated on the left.--Earth100 03:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-14 12-34-41-resine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 18:22, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-30 15-45-03-Papilio-palinurus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-30 15-40-34-Idea-leuconoe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 09:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-04-30 13-56-22-Idea-leuconoe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

2013-04-30 14-38-21-ocelle-caligo-3f.jpg

Bravo elle est très bonne cette image. Mais Biopic a raison il faut l'espèce. As-tu fait une autre image de ce papillon; si c'est le cas montre moi là je dois pouvoir la reconnaître. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Non, je n'en ai pas d'autres. Je ne connais que le genre : Caligo. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Blind category editing

Please stop with the automatic category editing! Most changes that you have been making are wrong. Why inserting a category of "Unidentified xxx" in a species which is fully identified? You should go over all your edits and revert the wrong ones. Best regards, Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

So if it's correctly identified, it should be correctly categorized. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

But in all the cases I saw the species was categorized correctly! Apparently, what triggered your edits was the fact that the genus or the family was also categorized. For example, if a species was categorized as Daucus carota and also as "Apiaceae", you changed the categorization to "Unidentified Apiaceae". See, for example, the story of this image. A different case is this poster showing different species of bees and wasps, which was correctly categorized as Hymnoptera and you changed to Unidentified Hymnoptera. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-32-31-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality -- Malchen53 19:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-39-20-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality -- Malchen53 19:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-14 16-09-20-chenille.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI--Lmbuga 19:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-11 22-06-40-gouttes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --LC-de 13:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-11 22-07-22-gouttes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --LC-de 13:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-11 22-03-08-gouttes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --LC-de 13:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-37-43-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Flowers overexposed, but subject ok. --Mattbuck 19:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-38-30-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Flowers overexposed, but subject ok. --Mattbuck 19:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-40-18-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Flowers overexposed, but subject ok. --Mattbuck 19:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Recently promoted QIs

Hi CH, this edit is a "negative contribution", you deleted more (of mine) than included. May I revert it to decrease the backlog? Regards, Poco² 16:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-10 09-41-34-savoureuse-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 19:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-10 09-45-58-savoureuse-valdoie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-09 15-52-03-coleoptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 13:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-09 16-31-13-syrphidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 13:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-07 21-14-27-thomisidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Holleday 09:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-04 16-07-46-Coleoptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-04 16-06-24-Coleoptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-06-10 10-14-22-savoureuse-belfort.jpg et al

What's with the sprays? -mattbuck (Talk) 19:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-12 23-01-22-braises.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-04 15-33-34-Hemiptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-14-Sedum-acre-9f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kor!An 20:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-14-Sedum-acre-14f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kor!An 20:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-10 10-14-22-savoureuse-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-10 10-22-34-savoureuse-belfort.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-07 21-02-52-Clytus-arietis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just about ok. --Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-07 15-26-02-salpetre-10f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-04 15-34-47-Hemiptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-07 21-06-46-Graphosoma-italicum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-07 16-08-35-thomisidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-21 15-35-32-Orthetrum-cancellatum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-21 14-48-16-syrphidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 09:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-23 15-57-28-Idea-leuconoe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cute. Excellent--Lmbuga 11:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-17 22-53-41-lightnings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-17 22-58-10-lightnings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-07 04-23-26-foudre-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 20:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-06 19-18-46-Argiope-bruennichi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-15 16-25-30-Acanthosomatidae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-16 16-06-22-batterie-eperon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-16 15-44-18-batterie-eperon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 17:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2013-08-16 14-49-26-batterie-eperon.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013-08-16 14-49-26-batterie-eperon.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-22-00-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-14-24-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-29-28-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 07:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-03-37-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-16 15-51-51-batterie-eperon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-32-54-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-35-36-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-36-17-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-38-14-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-40-09-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some problems, but main object is ok.--ArildV 09:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2013-08-07 04-23-26-foudre-belfort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013-08-07 04-23-26-foudre-belfort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)