Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, संजीव कुमार!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Rahul, I am not familiar with the procedure. These days I am a bit busy, so not able to read whole things. So please can you provide me the exact thing what I have to do. I asked the owner of the picture. He said that it is allowed in every sense from his side and he doesn't have any problem. ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 11:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hello Sanjeev, Firstly Atul Gurtu is not the owner of this picture as he is there in the pic. The copyright owner of a photograph is normally the person who took the photograph (in case, the photographer was employed for work, the employee is the owner). Moreover, the source that you have mentioned is vague. You need to provide the exact link. You should, therefore, find out the exact owner and urge him/her to send an email from his/her official email ID to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The rest of the procedure is explained in the above links and the OTRS people will guide the mailer from thereon. Thanks. Rahul Bott (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hello Rahul, I have changed the source link. Now I have kept the link of picasa album. Now the second thing is the owner. So, it is like I went on a visit somewhere. There I gave my camera to some unknown person to take my picture for few minutes. After that I took the camera and came back. So please let me know who is the owner of those pictures which were taken in my camera but triggered with another's hand. So in this case if Atul Gurtu is not the owner than I can't say anything but in either case I will ask to Atul Gurtu to send an email on permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and I am sure he will send. So please let me know?☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hello again, As long as the person who took the photograph was not employed, (s)he is the copyright owner even if it is someone else's camera. That is my understanding of the copyright laws. Rest is upto the OTRS volunteers to decide. I should add that as an exception, we do allow photographs taken by someone else (upon the subject's request) to be displayed on various user pages of the uploader. But, this exception is ofcourse not relevant here. In addition, the Picasa link that you gave asserts "All rights reserved" This means that hosting this image here on Wikimedia Commons is a clear copyright violation and I'm afraid it shall sooner or later be deleted by some administrator. Rahul Bott (talk) 12:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ok, so can you please tell me what should I ask for to Atul Gurtu?☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
You should ask him about who took the photograph, that person should send an email from his/her official email ID to the above email address. In addition, Atul should change the license and credits on his Picasa page for the image. Rahul Bott (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ok, so I will ask Atul and let you know.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Dear Rahul, I think now the rights of the Album has been changed and Atul Gurtu has sent an email also to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, so now please let me know whether it is ok or not.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 06:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
No, atleast to me now, no copyright statement is visible on the Picasa page of the image which by default implies that it is still copyrighted. Regarding the email, I cannot be of any help anymore as I don't have OTRS account. Some OTRS volunteer will reply to the email if more queries are there and will fix the image page on Commons accordingly. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
So, what I have to do now?☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

We can only wait now. I've already put a note at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Two tickets. Let's see when someone replies. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

thanks☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 06:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Latex devnag.png edit

 
File:Latex devnag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

This nomination is done by myself. If merging of both files is possible then I would like that.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 20:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I know, but the nomination was not complete and several days old. I completed it yesterda and thought better to inform you. It will be decided normaly a week after it got listed on a daily deletetion request page. regards. --JuTa 20:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


File:फाइनमेन चित्र.svg edit

 
File:फाइनमेन चित्र.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Again: Just to inform you that I completed that incomplete deletion request. JuTa 21:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg edit

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  magyar  português do Brasil  Nederlands  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  русский  suomi  日本語  +/−
 
File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

JuTa 06:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have got irritated with this file. If you would like to delete this picture plese do so. I requested to the author of this picture. He sent all the details and got irritated with the nonsense emails from wikipedia. I will not upload others pics in future. So please delete this picture. I don't want to ask anything more about it.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 07:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
OK,   Done --JuTa 08:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


 
File:लार्ज हैड्रान कोलाइडर.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

@JuTa: This nomination was done by me, so I think this message is useless.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests edit

Sanjeev ji, use Quick Delete tool for deletion requests. Go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets ('Maintenance tools' section) to turn on it. Regards.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 07:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Translation categories edit

Hi Sanjeev,

if you uploads more Hindi translations, please add them to Category:SVG diagrams in Hindi / Category:SVG maps in Hindi.

Thank you very much!--Cloned sheep (talk) 08:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Cloned sheep: Thanks, I shall do that in future.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 01:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply