Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 庚寅五月!

-- 12:46, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

FYI edit

File:Japanese Cemetery - Broome.JPG I saw you put this in the category Cemeteries in Japan when in fact its in Broome Western Australia I have put in the correct category. Gnangarra 03:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I made a mistake. Thank you for having corrected category and pointed out this mistake to me.--庚寅五月 (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
no worries, Its an easy one to make, given everything was in Japanese Gnangarra 01:41, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
 

helo 庚寅五月, sorry to bother you, but I have a small request. I tried to make a transcription of the text on the right and I came up with 廣重近江八景全. As a native speaker, could you tell me if this is correct? I am especially incertain about the last character. Accoring to the source of the file this is the name of the publisher (Kawaguchiya Shozō), but if this matches by transcription I don't know. Thank you. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 14:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Although there is no mistake in the character which you transcribed, it will be better to add spaces like "廣重 近江八景 全" because the text consists of three elements. 廣重 is the author name, 近江八景 is the title, and (Zen) is the volume number notation which means that complete in one volume. The character meaning Kawaguchiya Shozō is not included. --庚寅五月 (talk) 15:34, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
That's very interesting. I had no idea. Maybe the name of Kawaguchiya is mentioned inside the book on the prints only. Thank you very much for your explanation. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:43, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'm glad to be of some help.--庚寅五月 (talk) 22:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Viscount Takachika Fukuoka.jpg edit

 
File:Viscount Takachika Fukuoka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reventtalk 10:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Category:Symbols_of_Edogawa edit

 

Category:Symbols_of_Edogawa has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Xeror (talk) 07:25, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Symbols_of_Musashino edit

 

Category:Symbols_of_Musashino has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Xeror (talk) 07:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Symbols_of_Machida edit

 

Category:Symbols_of_Machida has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Xeror (talk) 07:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Symbols_of_Takamatsu,_Kagawa edit

 

Symbols of Takamatsu, Kagawa has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Xeror (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Re:File:Sagara Chotsuna.jpg edit

I made the mistake, thank you remind me, how can I change the name? Sorry, I don't know how to swap the file name in wikimedia, can you tell me?--Iflwlou (talk) 13:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cross namespace redirects edit

Hi, please do not create cross namespace redirects. Gallery pages should either contain a valid gallery or remain a red link. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you for pointing that out. According to the former guideline Commons:Galleries#Redirects, I thought that Cross-namespace redirects to categories should naturally be created, but the guideline did't follow the policy of speedy deletion (COM:CSD#G2), did it? It seems that the namespace 0 is for galleries to the last, it is not more than that.
I've already created many of this kind of redirects, so I will gradually request to speedy deletion of them.--庚寅五月 (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that's true. The guideline was misleading. Don't worry about the existing redirects, we will take care of them. Jcb (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
It seems that you've already deleted many redirects. I apologize for the trouble.--庚寅五月 (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
No problem, don't worry. Jcb (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Pattern of the Sea (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply