1bumer

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 1bumer!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 17:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear 1bumer, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, 1bumer!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Wieża oblężnicza.jpg was uncategorized on 25 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Trąbin-Wieś.jpg was uncategorized on 27 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikiprojekt:Fotografia

Niedawno na polskiej Wikipedii powstał Wikiprojekt:Fotografia. Jeśli chcesz dołaczyć do grona fanów fotografii, którzy swoimi zdjęciami wspierają polską Wikipedię, zapraszam do współpracy. :) -- CLI (talk) 19:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear 1bumer, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 16:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

re: File:Kruszwica kolegiata śś. Piotra i Pawła(WLZ13).JPG

Hi! The perspective correction you have made looks nice, but I think it's still tilted. See, for example, that the left wall is not vertical yet. You should just rotate the image a bit counterclockwise. Thanks for reworking. --Kadellar (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oporów zamek10(WLZ13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would remove the leafs at the very top middle. --Tuxyso 09:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment Halos around the branches on the top-right corner. --Laitche 10:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół pod wezwaniem Św. Andrzeja Apostoła w Broku nad Bugiem 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń Baszta Żuraw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inowrocław kościół NMP(WLZ13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear 1bumer, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear 1bumer, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cukrownia Kruszwica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 22:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/1bumer⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear 1bumer,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golub-Dobrzyń, zamek krzyżacki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń, Stare Miasto z Kępy Bazarowej nocą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 18:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golub-Dobrzyń, Kościół św. Katarzyny (Dobrzyń).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń, ruiny zamku krzyżackiego nocą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some flaws but considerung the circumstances of the nightshot and the camera settings, I think that this photo can pass as QI. ISO2800 noise is properly handled. --Cccefalon 21:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bobolice, zamek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky needs a clean-up. --Cccefalon 06:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)  Done --1bumer 17:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Ok. --Cccefalon 04:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirów, zamek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bydlin, kaplica cmentarna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruże, kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add an english description.--XRay 17:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)  Done--1bumer 18:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)  Support Good (now).--XRay 06:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek Bierzgłowski - relief.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Re:Hej, hej!

Hehe, to jest dobre pytanie. Kilkanaście dni temu to samo zadał mi Jacek Halicki i odpowiem Tobie tak samo jak jemu, tzn. nie mam pojęcia... Zauważ, że u mnie oraz u innych użytkowników Commons jest dokładnie ta sama sytuacja. Widocznie coś się popsuło i nikt z Adminów nie umi tego naprawić, bo to już trwa hmm może jakieś 2 tygodnie. Nie mam pojęcia o co chodzi... Acha, mam nadzieję, że nie masz nic przeciwko, że stworzyłem ci kategorię Twoich zdjęć Quality Images. Od teraz pamiętaj, że jeśli Twoje zdjęcie nominowane do QI zdobędzie ten certyfikat, to musisz ręcznie dodać to zdjęcie do swojej kategorii oraz dobrze by było abyś także dodawał kategorię Quality images of xxxx Voivodeship, czyli z jakiego województwa pochodzi to zdjęcie. Pozdrawiam --Halavar (talk) 20:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirów, zamek (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 09:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jastarnia, schron bojowy Sęp (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jastarnia, schron bojowy Saragossa 1 (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe slightly tilted, but QI --Poco a poco 16:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurkocin, wiatrak (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and excellent and clean composition! --Slaunger 19:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Brama Mariacka (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Żuraw (WLZ14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szkocka rasa wyżynna, krowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, kościół św. Katarzyny, baptysterium, detal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 22:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, kościół św. Katarzyny, baptysterium, chrzcielnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, kościół św. Katarzyny, baptysterium 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mechowo, groty mechowskie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Ruthven 22:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrostkowo, kościół św. Barbary 1 (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrostkowo, kościół św. Barbary (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and good exposure. --Ram-Man 02:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dębowa Łąka, kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej 1 (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please correct the minor clockwise tilt. --Uoaei1 18:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks! --1bumer 21:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puck, port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Wielka Zbrojownia (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image, given to the difficult perspective IMO very good --DKrieger 20:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olsztyn, zamek (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń, gdanisko i dawny młyn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Brama Złota i Wieża Więzienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golub-Dobrzyń, zamek krzyżacki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Westerplatte, wartownia nr 6 (WLZ14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bydgoszcz, Opera Nova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bydgoszcz, Jezuicka 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Twierdza Wisłoujście, latarnia i domy oficerów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Twierdza Wisłoujście, brama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Twierdza Wisłoujście, poterna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The contrast between dark and bright is clearly part of the composition. --Code 07:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk, Świętego Ducha, Dom Żeglarzy, portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puck, Plac Wolności.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirrus uncinus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Rather underexposed IMHO, but QI for me. --C messier 07:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jastarnia, schron bojowy Sęp (WLZ14).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jastarnia, schron bojowy Sęp (WLZ14).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skrwilno, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP i Wszystkich Świętych, dzwonnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Overall good quality, but there's a dust spot in the sky. I left a note. --Code 18:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)*  Done, thanks! --1bumer 19:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Code 05:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jarantowice, kościół św. Maksymiliana Kolbe, wejście.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trąbin-Wieś, głaz narzutowy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me, but background wall is a bit overexposed. --C messier 12:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jarantowice, kościół św. Maksymiliana Kolbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 06:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W115 220D (1973).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. But why f 5.6? -- Spurzem 19:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodnica, Duży Rynek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments unfortunate cropping (the bench) but overall good enough imo. --ArildV 20:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galeria Brodnica 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:49, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodnica, pomnik Anny Wazówny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bagienna Dolina Drwęcy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rypin, park im. Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego, popiersie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rypin, Galeria Młyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. --XRay 16:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mercedes-Benz W115 220D (1973).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes-Benz W115 220D (1973).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dynia zwyczajna, młody owoc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bydgoszcz, Przystań Bydgoszcz, okna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --C messier 18:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bydgoszcz, Przystań Bydgoszcz, okna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bydgoszcz, Przystań Bydgoszcz, okna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bagienna Dolina Drwęcy, ścieżka dydaktyczna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rypin, Rypińskie Centrum Sportu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 14:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń, kościół św. Janów (dzień).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rypin, kościół św. Trójcy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osiek (powiat brodnicki), kościół Wniebowstąpienia NMP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Podzamcze, zamek Ogrodzieniec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golub-Dobrzyń, kościół św. Katarzyny (Dobrzyń).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd also expect more resolution, but still ok --Poco a poco 20:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golub-Dobrzyń, dawny kościół ewangelicki 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - March - Inside / Outside

Why did you remove your photos from the challenge? They seemed appropriate? -- Colin (talk) 19:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodnica, kolejowa wieża ciśnień 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you please upload a larger version? --C messier 17:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC)  Done 1bumer 17:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)  Support OK, but some minor fringes if you want to further improve it. --C messier 18:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zajączkowo, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear 1bumer,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chełmno, Rybacka 2, poczta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chełmno, kościół św. Piotra i św. Pawła (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radzyń-Wybudowanie, wiatrak holender.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 22:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traczyska, kapliczka (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chełmno, kościół św. Piotra i św. Pawła.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this partial view. If you can give them, English descriptions are appreciated. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks! 1bumer 07:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chełmno, kaplica św. Marcina, XIV w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chełmno, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chełmno, kościół św. Jakuba i św. Mikołaja (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chełmno, wieża ciśnień (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Szkoda, że dół obcięty, ale i tak QI --Pudelek 10:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodnica, kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny, ambona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grudziądz, Brama Wodna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jabłonowo-Zamek, kościół św. Wojciecha, ambona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 14:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierpc, Muzeum Ziemi Mazowieckiej, kościół Najświętszego Serca Jezusowego z Drążdżewa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Close enough now, QI to me --Poco a poco 06:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paź królowej (Papilio machaon), głowa gąsienicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pająk kwietnik (Misumena vatia), samica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciechanów, wieżowy zbiornik wyrównawczy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PetarM 13:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)  Comment Might be worth an FPC nomination, but the upper and lower crops are very close. Is there a square(r) version with significantly more generous crops on the top and bottom? -- Ikan Kekek 17:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciechanów, wieżowy zbiornik wyrównawczy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodnica, Wieża Mazurska, szyld PTTK.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W115 220D (1973), tył.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ciechanów, wieżowy zbiornik wyrównawczy (3).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ciechanów, wieżowy zbiornik wyrównawczy (3).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)