221.20

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 221.20Commons!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, 221.20!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:鱒浦ホーム側.JPG is uncategorized since 21 March 2009.
Image:網走交通東藻琴営業所.JPG is uncategorized since 21 March 2009.
Image:鱒浦駅中.JPG is uncategorized since 21 March 2009.
Image:Bihoro station04.JPG is uncategorized since 24 June 2009.

Re.カテゴリ作成・分類について edit

ご質問をいただきました、天然ガスと申します。

当方のしでかしたカテゴリの乱立に、皆様、相当ご立腹なのでしょうか。そうでしたらお詫びいたします。

まず、区間をあらわす「～」は誤りで、後から「 - 」に訂正いたしました。「～」は消したつもりなのですが、見落としていたようです。駅の画像は未分類のまま、誰も整理する気配が無いようでしたのでが、とりあえず北海道から始めようと思ったのですが、時間がかかりすぎて、力尽きました。千歳駅も分かってはいながら、放置です。このような詰の甘さは、全て睡眠不足によるものです（皆さん助けてください＝もっと編集してください）。

線区別の列車カテゴリを作ろうと思ったきっかけは、国鉄時代に撮られた蒸気牽引列車の写真をたまたま見つけたことに始まります。それは資料としてはもちろん、観賞にも耐えられる、優れたものでした。しかし、その写真は非常に見つけにくいところにあったため、より多くの閲覧者の目に触れるよう、機関車の形式、線区名、列車名、列車種別など、多方面から検索できれば、と思った次第です。実際、特別鉄道に詳しくない、鉄道会社や車両形式の区別がつかない人々にとって、今のカテゴリ分類では、検索の手がかりが少なすぎます。また、カテゴリインデックスにはサムネイルがないため、分類後は文字の羅列になり、一般人は尻込みしてしまいます（ギャラリーも必要なのかもしれません）。片っ端から開いていけば、いつかはお目当ての画像に当たるかもしれませんが、如何せんそれでは時間がかかりすぎます。ですので、「詳しくない人」向け、「忙しい人」向けのカテゴリ構造を模索している最中です。いまのカテゴリ構造は、逆引き事典のような配慮に欠けていますし、いちいちトップカテゴリに戻らずとも、深い階層同士でリンクできるほうが便利だと思うのですが。よく「こんなカテゴリは必要ない」、「重複しているのでは」とのご批判もいただきますが、それは専門知識や余暇時間の豊富な方による一面的な見方だと思います。実際、マニア以外は使いこなせていませんから。

このほかにも「ここはどういうつもりなんだ！」という点がございましたたら、ご面倒でもお知らせください。参考にさせていただきます--Ten-nen 10:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

File:A Ashoro michinoeki03.JPG edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Do you have a better version of File:DMV01.JPG? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Thank you for your submission of File:DMV01.JPG. While all submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar, content? In many cases, the largest and highest resolution possible is the most useful version to have available. (MediaWiki has automatic resizing functionality, so there is no need for multiple versions of the same image at different sizes, users can select any size and the software will generate and cache the needed resolution on the fly.)

If you can supply the same exact image as File:DMV01.JPG at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.

Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated.

High Contrast (talk) 07:51, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I play a role and have a look at it. I'm sorry, only with the thing which I photographed with a mobile telephone, there is only this size. In addition, it is newly difficult to photograph it because I did not come to my residence place. I will contribute it in future when I was able to photograph a big image. Thanks in advance for your help.

日本語: こんにちは。いつもご活躍拝見してます。申し訳ありません、携帯電話で撮影したもののみで、このサイズしかないです。また、私の在住地に来なくなったため、新たに撮影することも難しいです。今後大きな画像を撮影できた場合は投稿します。今後ともよろしくお願い致します。

--221.20 (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Kiha183_okhotsk06.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kiha183_okhotsk06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 02:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Kiha183_okhotsk07.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kiha183_okhotsk07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 02:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Kiha183_okhotsk03.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kiha183_okhotsk03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 02:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Kiha183_okhotsk02.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kiha183_okhotsk02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 02:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you! edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

いつもメンテナンスありがとうございます。 Chatama (talk) (JAWP) 10:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

A pie for you! edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

いつもメンテナンスありがとうございます Chatama (talk) (JAWP) 13:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

ミントくんのマークが入った写真 edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

はじめまして。whymと申します。突然おじゃまいたします。File:Kiha54_Kitami_Mintkun02.JPGを拝見して少し気になったことがあったので、質問させてください。これは「ezoほたる」管理人氏の作品であり承諾を得て掲載なさったとのことですが、ミントくんのイラスト入りロゴそのものの権利状態が明らかになっていないように思います。こちらについても承諾を得ていらっしゃるのでしたら、そのように明記していただけないでしょうか？もし承諾を得ていらっしゃらないのでしたら、著作物性があると思われるイラストが大幅に写り込んでしまっているため、ウィキメディア・コモンズとしては受け入れるのが難しい写真になるのではないかと思います。お考えをお聞かせいただければ幸いです。 --whym (talk) 12:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

こんにちは。お返事が遅くなり申し訳ありません。この写真は列車に貼付されたステッカーであり、列車やバスなど公共交通機関の車両に描かれたものについては著作権問題は発生しないとされています。余白もあり問題ないものと考えます。ただ、私や交通に明るい方からすると列車に貼られているのは一目瞭然ですが、明るくない方からすると確かに疑念が発生する写真であることは否めないところではあります。私の考えとしては以上です。{{Trademarked}}を貼ってないのは私の凡ミスです。申し訳ありません。あと、すみませんが、私事でパソコンに向かう時間がなかなか取れない状況にあり、なるべく気にするようにしますが、以後のお返事は遅くなる可能性があることをご了承いただければと思います。よろしくお願い致します。221.20 (talk) 03:53, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

　お忙しいところお返事くださりありがとうございます。もし「列車やバスなど公共交通機関の車両に描かれたものについては著作権問題は発生しない」ということでしたら確かに問題ないと思います。ただ、このように、車体ではなくキャラクターの部分が主体に見える写真についてもそれは適用されるでしょうか？

　File:E311-1000.JPGのように車体の大部分を写した写真にキャラクターのイラストが小さく含まれているケースは問題ないと思うのですが、今回の場合は写真上ではイラスト部分が主体になっているため、難しいのではと思いました。知る限りもっとも近い判例は、東京地裁平成13(ワ)56号・平成13年7月25日民29判決「バス車体絵画事件」または「はたらくじどうしゃ事件」というものですが、そこではバスの車体の写真に車体上に描かれた絵画が写り込んでいたとき、その絵画の著作権は屋外美術の権利制限（46条）に該当し、なおかつその例外である、専ら販売を目的として複製すること（46条4号）にはあたらないため、写真を販売するにあたって絵画の著作者の許諾を得る必要はない、と解釈されたようです[1][2]。これを根拠にして、File:E311-1000.JPGは収録可能だと私は思います。しかし、今回の場合に適用できるかどうかはよく分かりませんでした。イラストが正位置で大きく写っている写真ですので、どちらかというと、「複製」にあたってしまうのではないかと思っています。「複製」であっても、コモンズは非営利ですのでコモンズへの掲載自体は著作権侵害にならないでしょうが、コモンズは商用利用できない画像を受け入れない方針をとっていますので、残念ながらコモンズには収録できないというのが私の理解です。

　著作物が映り込んだ写真を救済するコモンズの手引きやそれにもとづく削除審議の様子をみても、写真上で他人の著作物が主たる被写体になってしまっている場合は、救済されにくいようです。

　もちろんまったく専門家ではない立場からの意見ですので、上記の解釈が間違いでしたら不明をお詫びいたします。その場合、今回のような写真でも大丈夫だという理由をもう少し詳しくご教示いただけないでしょうか。読むべき解説書や判例等を示してくださればありがたいです。救済される例が増えるのは喜ばしいことですので、コモンズでも前掲の手引きや公共の場に置かれた作品の写真についての手引きに追記していくといいのではないかと思います。

　なお、ご存じかとは思いますが、ウィキペディア日本語版ではw:ja:Wikipedia:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針の対象になり、掲載可能なのではないかと思います。私の理解では、コモンズではそのまま商用利用可能であることが条件になりますが、ウィキペディア日本語版の上記の方針ではその条件は満たさなくてもいいはずです。

　結論を急いではいませんので、お時間のあるときにお返事いただければ幸いです。--whym (talk) 00:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

こんにちは。直近の議論としてはバスですがja:プロジェクト‐ノート:バス#キャラクターが描かれたバスの画像についてがあります。まさに「はたらくじどうしゃ事件」ですね。さらにいろいろ見ましたが、jaの屋外美術方針を詳しく見て、「jaにアップするならOK、commonsにアップするのはNG」と解釈でき、commonsにアップするのはマズイかなという考えになりました。自身のファイルはすべてcommonsでという考えなもので、このあたりの理解が疎かったです。ミントくんについて問い合わせる先がJR北海道なのか北見観光協会[3]なのかの判断が付かず（また、今回の件で問い合わせるのも先方に手間を取らせてしまうので）、使っている記事もこの写真が無いと本文に大きな影響があるものではありませんので削除する用意があります。この写真ファイルに私以外の編集はありませんので即時削除で大丈夫でしょう。お手を煩わせてしまい申し訳ありません。現在のところは以上です。221.20 (talk) 01:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

お返事ありがとうございます。私もそれでよろしいかと思います。おせっかいながら、ウィキペディアで長期間掲載中のファイルや有用そうなファイルの即時削除は本人依頼であっても断られ、削除審議にまわされるケースがあるようですので、ウィキペディアから除去して少し様子をみてからのほうが、すみやかに行くかもしれません。一方、削除依頼をしてコモンズのコミュニティの判断にゆだねるというのも一案かもしれません。口出しだけになって申し訳ないですが、具体的な対処はお任せしたいと思います。今後ともよろしくお願いいたします。 --whym (talk) 10:57, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Kiha54 Kitami Mintkun02.JPG edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kiha54 Kitami Mintkun02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

INeverCry 19:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't know how I mistook that photo for having snow in it... Thanks for fixing it. JesseW (talk) 08:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, JesseW. No problem. Thank you. 221.20 (talk) 08:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

上の#ミントくんのマークが入った写真で挙げられているファイルを私は拝見していませんが、おそらく同様の案件と想像します。Wikipedia:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針に従えばウィキペディア日本語版へのアップロードは可能と思われますので、ご検討のほどよろしくお願いします。Yasu (talk) 14:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

こんにちは。取り急ぎメッセージを確認したご連絡です。上のミントくんについては、列車に貼られたミントくんステッカーを大写しにしたものでした。ご連絡ありがとうございました。221.20 (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Akan bus S200F 2873.JPG edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Akan bus S200F 2873.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Flickrworker (talk) 00:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:221.20/BusInfo edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

221.20, I recently noticed that a lot of your files does not use standard Infobox template but your own User:221.20/BusInfo template instead. That is probably because standard Template:Bus-Information was in pretty bad shape until recently. However I did a lot of repairs to it lately so it is very similar to your User:221.20/BusInfo template. I am planning to replace all uses of User:221.20/BusInfo with Template:Bus-Information, as I did with File:Tokachi bus O230A 2019.JPG or File:Ashoro michinoeki02.JPG. Please make sure those two files look OK afterwards. If there are some issues with Japanese version of {{Bus-Information}} please fix it at {{Bus-Information/i18n}} or let me know and I will fix it. Regards. --Jarekt (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Megijima edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Megijima has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

miya (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Koshimizu kidō.JPG edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Koshimizu kidō.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

G I Chandor (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:MOS 10yen.JPG edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:MOS 10yen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:SKY Inflight01.JPG edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:SKY Inflight01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:SM Yakitori bentō.JPG edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:SM Yakitori bentō.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic