Last modified on 10 July 2014, at 18:10

User talk:555

Return to the user page of "555".
License icon-kopimi.svg

NotificationEdit

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

(supressed bad faith message)Edit

[1]

Bot de-flagging notificationEdit

Hi 555, I'm writing to you because your bot 555.bot (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a week from now (). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
For uploading the original Lusiads. ~ DanielTom (talk) 20:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
(I have no idea where you got those scans. They are from the 2nd edition of the 1572 printing, which slightly differs from the 1st. A true treasure!) ~ DanielTom (talk) 20:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Thankyou! On the first image from this set , for unknown reasons I dont' provided the file source (maybe because I was a n00b?), but on remaining I've credited the source according: this is the very first work available on PURPL.pt/BN.pt: http://purl.pt/1 ;-) Lugusto 21:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Fantástico, obrigado novamente. ~ DanielTom (talk) 21:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

DúvidaEdit

Este usuário carregou três imagens hoje 9 de julho que foram verificadas pelo FlickreviewR 2. Curiosamante se clicar nas ligações para origem das imagens encontra a indicação que a conta que carregou no Flick não existe mais. Não parece meio estranho que após as imagens serem aceitas que a conta do autor tenha sido desativada? Fabiano msg 21:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

CommentEdit

[2] Source is {{OWN}} because I made the photo of that portrait at the Museum, is it something wrong to point out at that fact?--Asqueladd (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

I thought the source parameter was meant to indicate the url direction or publication where you obtained the file (not qualifying there the place where you took a pic with your camera), resulting in OWN if it is was a work by yourself on, for example, a PD-work... But... Does is look fine now? [3] Have in mind the file were already categorised in Category:Museo Romántico, Madrid (the physical place)--Asqueladd (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)