Archive >

Please consider using image sets edit

Hi, it would be great if you create image set subcategories when you upload large numbers of similar images. I just created Gouges (photo series by Jens Mohr). It is not a good idea to put 708 very similar images directly into a category like Gouges (or Tools on white background). This also makes sense for smaller sets like Stamps for metalworking (image set by Jens Mohr) or Signets and their impressions (image set). You can use {{Set}} or {{Set with username}}. But to mention a common misuderstanding: It does not matter, who created the images. Greetings, Watchduck (quack) 13:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. These uploads weer part of some very early batch uploads from a GLAM. At the time images sets didn't exist and there wasn't enough metadata to have created the image sets even if that were the case. For this set of tool images an image set nicely groups the visually similar images together, but by moving them out of Category:Gouges you've also effectively ensured that they'll never get subcategorised by type. Because while the set is of 708 gouge images those are 708 different objects with different shapes and specialised usages (and different Swedish names). / André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 08:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests for ceramics uploaded from LSH edit

I replaced multiple DR notifications here by the three central ones which encompass the rest. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 07:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Fajans, bål med lock på fast fat, 1760-tal - Hallwylska museet - 90527.tif edit

 
File:Fajans, bål med lock på fast fat, 1760-tal - Hallwylska museet - 90527.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LinneaKarlberg (talk) 08:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Fajans, skål, 1925 - Hallwylska museet - 90520.tif edit

 
File:Fajans, skål, 1925 - Hallwylska museet - 90520.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Porslin - Hallwylska museet - 56613.tif edit

 
File:Porslin - Hallwylska museet - 56613.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Fajans, tallrik, 1930 - Hallwylska museet - 90600.tif edit

 
File:Fajans, tallrik, 1930 - Hallwylska museet - 90600.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elinor Rajka (talk) 12:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply