User talk:Apdency/2011 archive

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Polozooza in topic Deletion requests

As I said... edit

...I took these pictures myself. There is no copyright on these pictures. I did not add my name and date because I want to remain anonymous. Polozooza (talk) 18:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

You said you sent me an email: that is not true. I did not give an e-mail adress when I signed in. Polozooza (talk) 21:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I noticed that already. I didn't say to whom I sent the mail. It was a somewhat puzzling mail (twice) in my language to someone whose name I don't mention here, for your profit. Apdency (talk) 23:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well, thank you, I guess. Very mysterious, but thank you nonetheless. ;) Polozooza (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK, I hope you don't mind that i changed the date '2011-05-28' in both files to '2006'. I'd rather mention the full date, but this solution is in my view better than giving it an unjust date. Note the consequences: someone added one of the pictures on nl.wikipedia, with the line "Karremans bij de Nederlandse Veteranendag op 28 mei 2011". In connection with that, I also removed 'Veteransday' on en.wikipedia and made something vague of it, which hopefully keeps you out of harm's way. Apdency (talk) 10:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your help, I really appreciate this. I think I understand the date-thing better now then before; I'm relatively new to uploading images, you see. I'll keep this in mind next time I upload a file. Polozooza (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests edit

We fixed the issue now, luckily, yet the deletion request] remains on both files - I emptied those pages and someone then reverted my changes as vandalism. Could you settle the issue, perhaps? Polozooza (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I reacted here. Apdency (talk) 19:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
They still deleted it... I thought it was clear the issue was settled and the images where to be kept - now it has been removed and also removed from all pages, leaving the articles without proper illustration. Polozooza (talk) 16:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Apdency/2011 archive".