User talk:Apdency/2018 archive

Apeldoornsche Bosch

Hello, I am about to write the German article about the Apeldoornsche Bosch. As you are from Apeldoorn: Would it be possible to make some more photos from the place itself? There seem to be more memorial places. And a photo of the name lists would be nice, too.

I am very angry with myself, because I have been to Apeldoorn several times to Omnisport not knowing what happened there and that it is so near. Very shameful. --Nicola (talk) 14:38, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Indeed, Omnisport is very close to what used to be the Apeldoornsche Bosch. Well, I have not been on the terrain for years, so who knows here's the trigger. I'm not guaranteeing anything, but I'll let you know if I have made some new pictures. Anyhow, good idea to launch a German article about this history! Apdency (talk) 08:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

@Apdency: Sorry, I did not see your answer until now. Here is the article de:Het Apeldoornsche Bosch. Made me bad dreams :( I wrote some more articles about Dutch history in war time. Thank you for your help in advance, hartelijk bedankt --Nicola (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Nicola, you did a tremendous job. Very good article! But yes, how horrific what happened there in WWII... words can not describe. Groeten uit Apeldoorn, Apdency (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Bedankt! These are all the articles which I did or still plan to do. --Nicola (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Very good to see your focus on WWII themes relating to the Netherlands. To mention one: discoveries about Ans van Dijk's role in the betrayal of Anne Frank and her family were in the Dutch and international news recently, for instance here. Apdency (talk) 18:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

And hello again, Cologne. I can tell that I did visit the terrain! Last Sunday was an ideal day for such a photographic trip. You can watch the result in this category. I hope it can provide some benefit for your work. And I can use it for my own goals, too. ;) Apdency (talk) 07:58, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Dat is echt geweldig! Hartelijk bedankt! --Nicola (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Heel graag gedaan! Now I looked around there more intensely and gathered more information online, I must say I got quite impressed about what the institute was before the dark days came. Apdency (talk) 11:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:André Rieu annonce Strasbourg.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:André Rieu annonce Strasbourg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:André Rieu annonce Strasbourg.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yann (talk) 12:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)