User talk:AxelBoldt

Return to "AxelBoldt" page.

Please see my Wikipedia user page and leave comments at my Wikipedia user talk page, not here.

Pay attention to copyright Image:Mercedes Sosa poster.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Mercedes Sosa poster.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin Rizzo 04:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Immendorff artwortEdit

The photos of the artwork are Derivative works and have thus been deleted. The artwort is protected by copyright laws and without a permission by the author (to permissions@wikimedia.org) they are copyright violations. --Matt314 20:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


Image:Superoxide.pngEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Superoxide.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

العربية | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | français | galego | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | suomi | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


All your imagesEdit

Image deletion warning All your images have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. If the files are up for deletion because they have been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the files may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new files.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Image:Richter-Fenster.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Richter-Fenster.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Derivated work of an artwork, no freedom of panorama because the image was taken inside the cathedral. Raymond Disc. 19:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Cologne Cathedral Window by Gerhard Richter.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Cologne Cathedral Window by Gerhard Richter.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Derivated work of an artwork, no freedom of panorama because the image was taken inside the cathedral. Raymond Disc. 19:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I am of the opinion that the the design, on paper, was copyright to Richter (or his computer, since it was randomly generated). While responsibility for the design was Richter's, in all probability the colour-matching of the glass and the leading, which are also components of the creation, were almost certainly done by specialists in the field of architectural stained glass.
Once it is installed within the ancient framework it is essentially a window, and part of the architecture, like the decorative stone tracery in which it is set and the sculpture around the nearby doorway. It is now a building component. It is part of the nature of architecture in buildings of the Medieval style that pictorial matter is integrated with the buildings, not hung on the walls as individual artworks.
If this is not the case, then it raises questions about whether one can publish pictures of any church that has stained glass or any building that has decorative details, designed by an artist who has not been dead for the proscribed length of time.
Mandy 23:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
In my opinion there is a difference between an image of the copyrighted stained glass windows itself (as mainpart of the image like these two images) or an overview through the inner room of a church with copyrighted artwork as small parts of the whole image. All images with a focus to copyrighted artwork inside a room are copyvios. Raymond Disc. 10:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

National Grand Theatre detail.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:National Grand Theatre detail.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:National Grand Theatre detail.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Image:Matisse Chapel bell.jpg and Image:Matisse Chapel.jpgEdit

Hi, I'd just tagged those 2 pics as copyvio. This has been made by en:Henri Matisse (1869-1954). In France, there is no freedom of panorama. Sorry. - Zil (d) 08:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

categoryEdit

Hi Axel,
This modification is not a good modification. Pictures under a family category means that the pictures have unidentified species. If you wish those pictures to have a category (which is not really needed as they are in articles) you should create the species category category:Limulus_polyphemus.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello Axel,
You could perhaps help me with this Category:Limulidae: look at the pictures and move them to species categories. If the species name is not provided, you can put them in Category:Unidentified Limulidae. If the species cat does not exist, just create it empty (still with Category:Limulidae in it ;-))
When I come back from vacations, I will fill those categories.
Thanks Liné1 (talk) 15:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:T-Mobile G1 launch event.jpgEdit

Image deletion warning Image:T-Mobile G1 launch event.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello,

Well, yes that would have affected the decision, making me always more unsure what to do about such images... Do you have a copy of the license agreement ? Or of any sort of general conditions the user is asked to agree with when the product is sold ? Do you know if the drawing of a clock we see on the picture is part of the operating system or if this is some graphic displayed by some other software that merely happens to be run on the operating system ? Teofilo (talk) 22:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Cellulose structure fixedEdit

Thanks for the heads-up! I'm on a bit of a wikibreak, so it's lucky I saw the comment so soon. --Slashme (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed the orientation of the CH2OH groups. --Slashme (talk) 01:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:Phenol red zwitterion.png is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Phenol red zwitterion.png you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 20:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


TUSC token 77ff5773a5d3918d36b052925e857d12Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File tagging File:Ammazzateci_funerali.gifEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ammazzateci_funerali.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ammazzateci_funerali.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 15:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I informed the original uploader, it:Discussioni_utente:Delgiudice, see the log. The last version of the image description is now in the history of your talkpage, http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AxelBoldt&oldid=33526094. --Martin H. (talk) 16:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

AutopatrolEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. –Juliancolton | Talk 12:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 07:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File:The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpgEdit

I made a very slight edit to this image - cropping on the right side to match the left side. I made this edit in response to the featured picture nomination on enwiki ([1]). I felt the change was minor enough to warrant being bold. If you're dissatisfied, feel free to revert. Thanks! Jujutacular (talk) 10:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Helene-Fischer-Goettingen.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Helene-Fischer-Goettingen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

93.211.93.14 00:27, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

MeSH-example.svgEdit

Hi!
File:MeSH-example.svg seems to have still the same problem concerning the text which is placed totally wrong at right hand side. firefox seems to render it correctly, see [2] (with firefox). but the internal mediawiki svg renderer seems to fail. -- seth (talk) 22:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

You're right, it still looks crappy. Chrome can't render it either, but it looks ok in firefox, inkscape and Adobe SVG Viewer. It's probably a bug in librsvg, the library we use to render SVG. The image is in Category:Pictures_showing_a_librsvg_bug. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Don't manually screen scrape zoomable imagesEdit

Hi AxelBoldt, I noticed you went to an extensive painful effort to manually scrape File:The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpg, which I recently updated to a higher-resolution version. I have software to do this stuff automatically, contact me if you need help with anything :-) Dcoetzee (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Helene-Fischer-Goettingen.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Helene-Fischer-Goettingen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Sut Jhally 2004.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sut Jhally 2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sutjhally (talk) 22:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Sut Jhally March 2006.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sut Jhally March 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sutjhally (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

"Thalidome"?Edit

At File:Mat Fraser 01.jpg and elsewhere, you changed Category:Phocomelia to Category:Thalidome birth defect.

  • I assume you meant to write "Thalidomide", not "Thalidome".
  • If you are going to do a move like this, you should create the category.
  • I have my doubts about this move in general, because Phocomelia is the actual name of this particular birth defect. Thalidomide caused numerous birth defects. It might be worth adding rather than replacing: Thalidomide is doubtless the cause, but phocomelia is the result.

- Jmabel ! talk 00:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Good point; phocomelia can have many causes and thalidomide can have many effects; I needed a category Category:Thalidomide birth defect for the phocomelia-due-to-thalidomide so that I could make that a subcategory of both Category:Thalidomide and Category:Phocomelia. Do you think Category:Thalidomide phocomelia might be a better name? AxelBoldt (talk) 01:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Last modified on 21 January 2014, at 04:41