Last modified on 26 March 2014, at 23:00

User talk:Binoyjsdk

Return to "Binoyjsdk" page.



WelcomeEdit

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Binoyjsdk!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Transfering images to CommonsEdit

Hi! Thanks for uploading to Commons. I changed one of your uploads [1]. Please be careful not to change license during upload. You can for example use http://toolserver.org/~magnus/commonshelper.php when transfering to Commons. The program should help you find the right license. --MGA73 (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Binoyjsdk!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

ചിത്രങ്ങൾEdit

പ്രിയ ബിനോയ്,

താങ്കൾ പാളയം ജൂമാമസ്ജിദ് എന്ന ചിത്രം കോമ്മൺസിലും ആക്കിയിരിക്കുന്നത് കണ്ടു. ഞാൻ മലയാളം വിക്കിയിൽ അപ്ലോഡിയ കുറച്ചു ചിത്രങ്ങൾ ഇവിടെ കാണാം കോമ്മൺസിലേക്ക് അത് ഉപയോഗിക്കാൻ പറ്റുമെങ്കിൽ ധൈര്യമായി ഉപയോഗിക്കാവുന്നതാണ്. താങ്കളുടെ അഭിപ്രായം പ്രതീക്ഷിക്കുന്നു. സസ്നേഹം, --സുഗീഷ് (talk) 16:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)


"Over-categorisation" referring to Category:Thiruvananthapuram (district)Edit

Hi Binoyjsdk, in general i appreciate very much to get "human support" in categorisation (i do that for around a year) of Indian states and to establish more systematics in categorisation – Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh are on my "watchlist" – of the so much beautiful Kerala state  :-)

Referring to the topic "over-categorisation" some contra-arguments of and "old" commonist in categorisation of the Indian states:

  • to establish for a total of around 30 files a imho completely "over-categorisation" – starting to redirects categories to a (imho senseless) "additional/new" Category:Thiruvananthapuram district instead to use the "good established" and (more) "logical" Category:Thiruvananthapuram (district) (please see systematics for the other districts of Kerala!) – is imho not a good idea.
  • Why? imho you're "effort" for these (very) few files is much more "confusing" than "usefull" respectively not "user-friendly" => too many categories for some few files <=, and, therefore, the "established" categorisation for Trivandrum district has been re-established (Varkala and some others excluded).

Please try to avoid such so-called "over-categorisation", but "we" are very happy when you will support in future a "practical" and "user-friendly" categorisation :-)

Or, do you have good reasons to do so as above mentioned, so, please, tell me now ??

Best regards, Roland 20:44, 13 June 2010 (UTC)


[moved to your user talk]Hi Roland zh,
Thank you for informing about Over-categorisation. I understand that. I will try to support "practical" and "user-friendly" categorisation. But i think its better to write the name of the districts category without Parentheses. For example it is better to write Category:Thiruvananthapuram (district) as Category:Thiruvananthapuram district. Other wiki projects like en Wikipedia and ml Wikipedia uses names without Parentheses. Hope you will consider this.
I am new to commons. I will try to do the right thing. If i make any mistakes, please inform me (and you can Undo my mistake just like Category:Thiruvananthapuram (district);) ).
Thanks;) BINOY Talk 08:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)


Hi BINOY,
You are welcome, and thank you for your answer; i am happy, that we can agree in categorisation :-)
To write on wikimedia commons the district names (of God's own country) with parentheses, imho we are able to "separate" much better between cities and districts sharing the same names, i.e. imho better usability and avoiding misleading categorisation, that's why they were used respectively i started to do so a year ago. Personally i do not think that the (changing and incohorent) systematics on p.e. EN-WP (i'm sorry not to be able to understand Malayalam) therefore is "better" or "worse" ;-)
In addition, in nearly all Kerala related commons category and gallery (p.e. Kerala) descriptions (about >100) etc. they are used in the form "Districtname (district)".
And for these reasons (same "category tree" as EN-WP etc.), to rename them is imho "wasting time" used much better for other things, among them to categorize some more Kerala related images in general (among them some Varkala related ;-)), to upload (i'm "commons photographer" too, Switzerland related) some more images or spending "offline-time" for other leisure activities as taking much more photographs to upload on wikimedia commons ;-).
WELCOME on wikimedia commons, and i do not think that you did "mistakes" – you didn't, thank you very much for your "input" :-)
As mentioned, Kerala related categories and some galleries are on my "watchlist", and we'll share "online" times in common interests :-)
Best regards from Zürich (Switzerland) to Varkala :-) Roland 10:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Your Flickr uploadsEdit

Hello Binoyjsdk!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:

  • Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
  • You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!

Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 09:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Image transfer from Wikipedia to CommonsEdit

Hello Binoyjsdk!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! If you transfer images from Wikipedia to Commons, please use this tool. This tool retains all relevant information with correct sourcing and licencing. And by the way it makes file transfers faster and easier for the uploader.

Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 09:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptionsEdit

العربية | català | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | polski | português | русский | українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Chenkalchoola.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 09:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC)


Thank you for your information and help. Happy editing :) BINOY Talk 16:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Nokia N8 with Nokia Belle.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nokia N8 with Nokia Belle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Conpibien (talk) 18:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Nokia N8 Smartphone.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nokia N8 Smartphone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 09:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Thiruvananthapuram lakshadeepam.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Thiruvananthapuram lakshadeepam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

കുമാര്‍ വൈക്കം (talk) 06:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 00:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Binoyjsdk,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)