Last modified on 20 January 2014, at 16:06

User talk:Boberger

Return to "Boberger" page.

Image:Svea_fotogenkök.jpgEdit

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 09:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help. No problem with copyright law of Sweden as far as I can see.--Boberger 18:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bill Reid Haida Gail 01.jpgEdit

Image:Bill Reid Haida Gail 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Themightyquill 22:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Commented on on the picture page. --Boberger 18:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Conclusion: The image is ruled to remain on Wikimedia Commons on ground that Canadian copyright law could be considered to be applicable, as the sculpture is on the grounds of the Canadian embassy. Boberger (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Banksy graffitiEdit

Image deletion warning Banksy graffiti have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

  • This was my response on the deletion request page:
  • Symbol keep vote.svg KeepIt´s to me absurd that somebody like Banksy, that has chosen to be anonymous, should be able to claim that his grafitti should be covered by copyright. It is likewise funny when somebody else claims that something that has an unknown originator should be covered by copyright, as copyright rules are meant to protect rights of publically known persons.
  • Boberger (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Flugan_stamp.JPGEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Flugan_stamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

There is no reason to delete this picture of a stamp from Wikimedia Commons. The stamp is not an original picture, but a reproduction of a known photo. This photo is already uploaded since 2004 on English Wikipedia as Flugan.jpg and at Wikimedia Commons as flugan.jpg. The photo was taken around 1902-1903 by an unknown photographer. According to Swedish law such a photo is free if taken before 1944.

Unfortunately I observe that the photo has already been deleted, which due to my opinion has been done in an unnecessary rush. You cannot expect people to watch notifications on their wiki pages within such limited timespan.

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Boberger!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Categories added today.Boberger (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Category för Image:Ebba.... corrected today.Boberger (talk) 13:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories added!Boberger (talk) 18:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 058f8e71b679eca92d835e2e6e0d7b81Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 50fa84f85436d57025c0caafcb447383Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! TUSC token 50fa84f85436d57025c0caafcb447383


File source is not properly indicated: File:Max_Sievert.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Max_Sievert.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Max_Sievert.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Max Sievert was born in 1949 and died in 1913. The name of artist of image is not documented to my knowledge and will be difficult to trace. By the look of Mr Sievert, one may assume that he is younger than 50 years old at the time, which sets the date of the work not later than 1900. This makes it probable, but far from sure, that the unknown artist was deceased by 1939. Boberger (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Johan Peter Molin Baltesspannare.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Boberger (talk) 14:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


File:Christian Ericsson Skogsraa 01.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed.Boberger (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Eric Grate Hon lyssnar pa jorden.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Boberger (talk) 14:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


File:Arle_Elllika_070128.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arle_Elllika_070128.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 14:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, this is not a clearcut issue. Ellika is a sculpture owned by the Regional Government of the county of Stockholm and is located in the subway station "Mariatorget" in Stockholm. While subway stations above ground possibly with no doubt are public spaces covered by right by Swedish laws on immaterial rights to take photos where the copyright belongs to the photographer (only), underground stations could be arguable in this respect. They are not clearly bindoors (which must be interpreted to be inside a building, not tens om meters below ground in solid rock) but are not clearly outdoor either (if by outdoor is meant in fresh air). You might put a large sum on that this issue has never been dealt with in a Swedis h court, neither tas the drafters of the bill never documented anything that might easily interpret the law in this respect. This is obviously a case never thought of at the time of drafting of the bill, or reviewing it.

In a case of doubt, I cannot see any reason not for Wikimedia Commons to interpret the rights issue in a way that is in favour of the public interest side of the argument and not of the "private" side. Boberger (talk) 13:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Takashi Naraha Mandala Kalmar.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

License added.

Boberger (talk) 07:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Grate_antiken.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grate_antiken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

/grillo (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Kokeshi dolls.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:20, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I´ve asked for assistance on Filniks Discussion page. Boberger (talk) 21:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Sten Dahlstrom Smältsmeden.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Boberger (talk) 11:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Stridsvagnshinder Landskrona.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Boberger (talk) 08:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Asmundur Sveinson Sonartorrek.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Asmundur Sveinson Sonartorrek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Fingalo (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I have nothing to do with this picture, which is uploaded by other User.Boberger (talk) 08:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Rottneros Asmundur Sveinsson Moder jord.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rottneros Asmundur Sveinsson Moder jord.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fingalo (talk) 11:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Se Discussion page för picture file, where I have explained appropriate Swedish copyright law, which permits publication of this picture.Boberger (talk) 08:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Lars-Gunnar Andersson 01.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. License has now been added.Boberger (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

File:CajsaStina Åkerström 01.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Fixed.Boberger (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Kopano MatlwaEdit

Hej, du tycks ha blandat ihop två författare på bokmässan. Category:Kopano Matlwa visar en karl, men Matlwa är kvinna! Jag har försökt luska ut vem du kan ha fångat, men är dålig på ansikten. Du kanske minns sammanhanget och kan ta reda på vem det var? /Jssfrk (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Tack för din anmärkning. Visst blev det fel. Jag har så länge ändrat uppgifter på filbeskrivningssidorna och kategorisidan och ska försöka reda ut vem det är som jag fotograferat.Boberger (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Rätt person är den nigerianske författare Helon Habila, Category:Helon Habila!
Boberger (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Helon Habila 01.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:00, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

FIxed. Boberger (talk) 18:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Helon Habila 02.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

FIxed Boberger (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Mall för projektetEdit

Hej! Vi kan använda Template:Cloudberry på de filer som vi laddar upp. Jag ska snygga till lite på mallen senare, men det är ju bra om vi kan få in den på bilderna på en gång. --Ainali (talk) 07:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Bergshamra Moratugan Anders Ersgården 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergshamra Moratugan Anders Ersgården 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Tullgarns slott boat house.jpgEdit

Hej Boberger

Du ändrade i info-texten till rubr bild File:Tullgarns slott boat house.jpg. Tidigare stod "... Sweden. Boat-house." och nu står det "... SwedeN. One of originally tho bath huta."

Jag hade för mig att det står båthus på informationsskylten, men du vill ha det till badhytt, eller något liknande? Är lite osäker på tolkningen av din text. --Xauxa (talk) 10:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Hej Xauxa!
Ursäkta skrivslarvet. Jag har nu ändrat till "one of two ... bathing huts" Bathing hut är det ord som mitt lexikon har för badhytt, även om jag tror att det främst beskriver den typ av små fristående badhytter som var vanliga ute på badstränderna under 1900-talets första hälftn (och ibland var mobila med hjul under).
Jo, din bild på bryggan föreställer en omklädningshytt på bryggan. Infoskylten visar också en bild från omkring 1930 med Gustav V på väg ut på bryggan, där det då fanns två likadana badhytter symmetriskt arrangerade. Det finns också ett båthus, ungefär där bilden är tagen, och infoskylten står också placerad där (en gemensam infotavla över både brygga/badhus och båthus). Jag vet detta, därför att jag var i Tullgarn på utflykt i går. och tog också en bild av brygga/båthus, innan jag visste att Du tagit en nästan likadan. Däremot tog jag ingen bild av båthuset.
Hälsningar Boberger (talk) 12:47, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Bra, då känner jag mig lugn. Jag kom ihåg skylten med kungen, men det var ett tag sedan. Förresten, apropå skrivfel, så kan man nu även få filnamnen rättade, det gick ju inte tidigare. Skönt när små förtretligheter kan rättas till. --Xauxa (talk) 21:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hur rättar man filnamn? Jag har massor med gånger skrivit dem felaktigt? Boberger (talk) 22:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Jag tänkte väl det att du bör ha mött samma problem som jag, för mig var det här också en ny funktion. Tidigare fick man begära delete och sedan ladda upp igen med korrekt filnamn, vilket känns övermaga när det kanske gäller ett enstaka felslag i ett filnamn. Nu kan man använda Template:Rename, lägga in och följa mallen {{rename|new name.jpg|reason for new name}} på bildens textsida så får man det fixat snabbt av någon. Kul att jag kunde förmedla detta! Jag tänkte det här får jag föra vidare :) --Xauxa (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Drottningholm & kategorierEdit

Hej! Trevligt med alla nya bilder från Drottningholm. Det vore dock bra om du tog en titt på de befintliga kategorierna, då bla många byggnader har egna kategorier, och de flesta kategorier är namngivna på engelska. Strukturen lämnar alltjämt en hel del i övrigt att önska, men det motiverar förstås inte att lägga bilder om samma ämne i olika kategorier. Allt gott, /Urbourbo (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Jag upptäckte litet sent in i processen att huvudkategorien heter Royal Domain of Drottningholm och inte Drottningholms slott, i och för sig ett inte helt lyckat namn, Drottningholm Castle hade varit bättre. Jag får ta och gå igenom bilderna senare för att omkategorisera och då se till att de kommer in i lämpliga understrukturer. Hälsningar Boberger (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
OK gott. Ja, detta med "royal domain" låter ju lite krystat, även om det kanske är det vedertagna engelska namnet? Hursomhelst finns en poäng i att ha en huvudkategori för hela området, och en annan kategori för huvudbyggnaden. Den senare skapade jag (tills vidare) som "Drottningholm Palace (main building)". Allt gott, /Urbourbo (talk) 14:13, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Ja, det är bra att du lagt upp huvudbyggnaden som en egen underkategori- Samma behövs åtminstone för parken, skulpturerna, Kina slott och kanske också¨teatern. Hälsn Boberger (talk) 14:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
De andra du nämner är redan fixade sedan tidigare! ;) Allt gott, /Urbourbo (talk) 14:32, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Dan_Andersson_Järntorget_01.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dan_Andersson_Järntorget_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.232.124.8 10:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I would suggest a discussion with the busy-body user who has bothered the community with this suggestion for deletion, and demandt tha he or she tries to find out basic facts about copyright rules in a specific country (is this case Sweden) before making such far out-of-the-way interventions. The same user has marked a number of similar pictures with a suggestion-for deletion.Boberger (talk) 07:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Dan_Andersson_Järntorget_02.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dan_Andersson_Järntorget_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.232.124.8 10:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I would like to suggest a discussion with the busy-body user who has bothered the community with this suggestion for deletion, and demandt tha he or she tries to find out basic facts about copyright rules in a specific country (is this case Sweden) before making such far out-of-the-way interventions. The same user has marked a number of similar pictures with a suggestion-for deletion.Boberger (talk) 07:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Arne_Jones_Katedral.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arne_Jones_Katedral.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.232.124.8 11:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I would like to suggest a discussion with the busy-body user who has bothered the community with this suggestion for deletion, and demandt tha he or she tries to find out basic facts about copyright rules in a specific country (is this case Sweden) before making such far out-of-the-way interventions. The same user has marked a number of similar pictures with a suggestion-for deletion.Boberger (talk) 07:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Arne_Jones_modell_Romersk_vagn.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arne_Jones_modell_Romersk_vagn.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.232.124.8 11:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I would like to suggest a discussion with the busy-body user who has bothered the community with this suggestion for deletion, and demandt tha he or she tries to find out basic facts about copyright rules in a specific country (is this case Sweden) before making such far out-of-the-way interventions. The same user has marked a number of similar pictures with a suggestion-for deletion.Boberger (talk) 07:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Arne_Jones_Progression.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arne_Jones_Progression.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.232.124.8 11:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I would like to suggest a discussion with the busy-body user who has bothered the community with this suggestion for deletion, and demandt tha he or she tries to find out basic facts about copyright rules in a specific country (is this case Sweden) before making such far out-of-the-way interventions. The same user has marked a number of similar pictures with a suggestion-for deletion.Boberger (talk) 07:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/<sculptures from sweden>Edit

It was an IP and the IP was blocked after LX asked for. Unfortunately it was a clever user, who knows that one has to delete all cookies, start a new browser session and has to obtain a new IP-address to circumvent the block. (Ref: COM:AN/B#178.232.124.8→This is also the right place to discuss this matter.)

Please remember that arguments, which focus on the nominator, will not decide the result of the deletion request.

Thank you for all your contributions. Sincerely. -- RE rillke questions? 07:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Boberger (talk) 09:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Boberger,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion requestEdit

The following message added here as a matter of formality. As you may see on the deletion discussion page it´s I myself that has asked for the deletion. Boberger (talk) 13:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Lotte Möller 2011.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lotte Möller 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Boberger (talk) 13:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

SwedenEdit

If you remove year-based articles from categories of a town in Sweden, please move them to just "x year in Sweden". Also, I think it's OK to have category by year from circa 2005. And also, "Jönköping in the 20th century" is better than "history of Jönköping in the 20th century". J 1982 (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

It is not possible to scout for usable pictures by users with the method you have categorized. Some pictures have been almost totally hidden by this fine network of tertiary categories, with little primary categorization by substance. You should not impose a standard finegrained category system by year on the users, especially not for substance categories of little volume. You should also not start with possibly logical systems before there is any demand for structures of this neatness! There should be a practical balance between volume of pictures in any one category och the finetuning av sub-categories! I know that you have been warned before for excesses in starting too finetuned category treees. Better used your constructive energy on project more appreciated by the community! Boberger (talk) 20:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm talking of using this system from 2004-2005, when there are images enough. It's OK that you move categories from earlier years than that into centuries, but not recent years when we have a lot of pictures. J 1982 (talk) 20:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:BygglovshandlingarEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Bygglovshandlingar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 14:59, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Commented and corrected. Boberger (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Tack! LX (talk, contribs) 21:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Regards Psychonaut (talk) 16:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Boberger,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 22:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

This sculpture is not "Öppen famn"Edit

Not "Öppen famn"
Öppen famn

Hello! The sculpturer Roland Anderson who created "Öppen famn" contacted me and said that a picture that claimed to show his "Öppen famn" is really some other sculpture. His sculpture is placed where Berzeliigatan meets Skånegatan in Göteborg, and I took some pictures although the weather was not perfect. Maybe you should correct the info and categories on your image. /Rolf B (talk) 22:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for being notified on this error. I have now changed "description" and "category". I´m going to Göteborg next week, and may be able to get the other sculpture identified then. Therefore, I´ll wait a while until asking the administrors to change the title of the image. Boberger (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Fine! /Rolf B (talk) 22:56, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Olof Hellström Kluven.JPGEdit

The file was lost due to an server bug. Recovering is very expensive or even impossible. Please reupload this image if the source is still accessible to you. Yours sincerely McZusatz (talk) 13:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for notification. I will look for the uploaded photo or will take a new one in due course. Boberger (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Johan Turi Jukkasjärvi kyrka Andersmäss.jpgEdit

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Johan Turi Jukkasjärvi kyrka Andersmäss.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 19:06, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Johan Turi manus 1910.jpgEdit

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Johan Turi manus 1910.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 19:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Johan Turi Rajd.jpgEdit

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Johan Turi Rajd.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 19:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)


File:Kotte Poul Henningsen.JPGEdit

Hi Boberger, I assume that such creative works as this lamp are copyrighted-protected in Denmark. Are you sure that it is not? Otherwise would recommend to open a regular deletion discussion in order to attract more expertise about that question. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)



català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Boberger,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,
the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Wiki Loves Public Art logo
Message delivered by odderBot on 13:26, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I use one of your photosEdit

Hello Bengt!

I have use a photo of Alcyonium digitatum from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=37716


If you wish (and I hope yes), you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia (In your profile there is a link to your flickr gallery):

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Bengt%20Oberger

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Boris%20Loboda

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I am very pleased by your usage of this photo on your site, and you are off course free to you other of the photos uploaded by me.
As you may have noted, the photo was taken last year at Tjärnö research station, which is run by the University of Gothenburg, and situated south of Strömstad

In the northern part of the province of Bohuslän, just south of the broder to Norway. I am sure that you would also get assistance from the research station, in café you need photos of other species from this habitat. The station is by the way situated close to a very specific habitat, which since two years is a Protected area, constituting the firat underwater national park of Sweden ( and perhaps in All of Europe as well? Regards Boberger (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your quickly response!
Yes, I need a lot of photos of underwater species (and others), because I will be aware of your photos, of course.
May I use your photo and adapt your "Användare Boberger" of to complete your profile in Animalandia?
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Bengt%20Oberger
Fernando.lison (talk) 16:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Please do! Boberger (talk) 14:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I do! A lot of thanks!

TingshustunnelnEdit

Hi Boberger, where are these "murals" File:Acke Oldenburg Målade klinker i Tingshustunneln i Huddinge 07.JPG (File:Acke Oldenburg Målade klinker i Tingshustunneln i Huddinge 06.JPG, File:Acke Oldenburg Målade klinker i Tingshustunneln i Huddinge 05.JPG, File:Acke Oldenburg Målade klinker i Tingshustunneln i Huddinge 04.JPG, File:Acke Oldenburg Målade klinker i Tingshustunneln i Huddinge 03.JPG, File:Acke Oldenburg Målade klinker i Tingshustunneln i Huddinge 02.JPG, File:Acke Oldenburg Målade klinker i Tingshustunneln i Huddinge 01.JPG) originally located? Are the terms for Commons:FOP#Sweden completely fulfilled, i.e. located permanently at public places outdoors?
In addition, when uploading images of sculptures and similar works of art, which are still copyrighted, but are covered by Commons:FOP#Sweden, please add the template {{FoP-Sweden}} to the image description. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reminder of use of specific template for such pictures.
The paintings of Acke Oldenburg, who as it happens was a brother of Claes Oldenburg, on ceramic tiles in Tingshustunneln, are located on the walls of a Swedish Communications Infrastructure Board (Trafikverket) owned bicycle and footpath tunnel under the railway tracks close to Huddinge centrum southwest of Stockholm in Sweden, see coordinates below
Object location 59° 14′ 19.15″ N, 17° 58′ 54.46″ E View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap - Google Maps - Google Earth info
.
The tunnel must be considered as definitely outdoor, as the tunnel is completely open at both ends. The art work is permanently located there, and it is also an integrated part of the construction. Regards Boberger (talk) 14:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
O.k., thanks. Let's hope he or his heirs/agency is different that his brother's[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I believe we can look forward to another reception of these images.Boberger (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Photo des Blasons de l'ordre du Séraphin dans l'Eglise de RiddarholmenEdit

Bonjour, Monsieur, excusez moi de vous déranger, je Dunkerqueenflandre de Wikipedia France, je suis entrain de reconstituer l'Armorial des Rois, des Reines et des Princes de Suède.https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maison_Bernadotte#Armoiries_des_princes_et_princesse_de_Su.C3.A8de_de_1818_.C3.A0_1977

Hélas il me manque quelques sources auriez vous ou pourriez vous s'il vous plait prendre des photos

des Blasons de Carl Bernadotte, Oscar de Suède, Wilhelm de Suède, Erik de Suède, Sigvard de Suède, Carl Johan Bernadotte et Lennart Bernadotte.

Vous en remerciant d'avance, bonne journée à vous cordialement--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:58, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Arguments against deletion added at adeqate webpage. User:Boberger October 16, 2013

Abuse of administrators rightsEdit

Moved from COM:ANV to COM:AN/U. This is NOT a clear case of vandalism. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

The file has been restored. FYI, DSchwen is a he, you can see his real name on one of his photos, for example and him, in person on his user page. Note that we administrators daily delete about 1000 copyright violations so errors like this may happen. Next time, you can simply ask the deleting admin, first. They will likely apologize, restore the file in question and you'll get some friendly and warm words in return. Kind regards -- Rillke(q?) 21:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your action and for your comment. I realize the burden of an administrator in taking care of pictures violating copyright and answering to requests for deletion. However, I also have a problem on my side as an Wikimedia editor. I upload hundreds of photos on (non-abusive) objects of art in Sweden every year and will continue with that (I would guess that only in Sweden there are 10,000 sculptures and other permitted outdoor objects of art) and always illustrate articles with them. I nowadays try as much as possible to remember to include a template "FoP-Sweden" in the image description, but for earlier uploaded photos that was never the standard, and keeping full track of such earlier uploaded photos is not really feasible.
Thus, it is really a problem to get an photo that is OK deleted without getting a notice by the deleting administrator (either that it is in for a deletion question procedure, or that the image has been deleted). There is no possibility for me to routinely otherwise get to know when a picture of mine has been deleted, as there are such a volume of Wikipedia articles with my photos to patrol. In this specific case it just happened that the person requesting deletion had an afterthought.

That´s why I reacted not only on the specific case level. Regards Boberger (talk) 23:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Boberger, the allegations of administrator rights abuse against me sounded pretty specific. It may be easy to forget that there are human being behind internet names. If you want to not act "only on the specific case level" an RFC about deletion practices may be a better choice. But I suggest you make yourself familiar with our policies beforehand. Cheers Dschwen (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Kirsten Malling Biering 01.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kirsten Malling Biering 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Butterfly trees (talk) 21:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion requestEdit

File:Kirsten Malling Biering 01.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kirsten Malling Biering 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Butterfly trees (talk) 21:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Boberger,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Thielska Galleriet.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Thielska Galleriet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Well, I seem to have mixed up the arithmetic. So we have then to wait some time for the Public Domain status for this image! Boberger (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Boberger,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:David Liljemark 01.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:David Liljemark 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paracel63 (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Persons often dislike portraits of them, that others think are OK. I do not agree with DL:s view, but in think there is a problem with the one you have uploaded, and the problem is that it's not a very accurate depiction. He dos not look like the image, which I believe is because the perspective is odd and that the photo is taken from below. On the other side, it is of course pleasant also to please the person depicted. Boberger (talk)<

File:Olof Hellström Kluven.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Olof Hellström Kluven.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 12:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

An unsuccesful attempt to upload an image. The sucessful one is here: File:Olof Hellström Kluven 01.JPG. Boberger (talk) 13:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hagerstens hembygdsforening Vinterviken.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hagerstens hembygdsforening Vinterviken.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hagerstens hembygdsforening Vinterviken.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I will not be able to arrange for OTRS for the moment. Please delete the image. Boberger (talk) 15:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Boberger. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)