Last modified on 18 November 2014, at 14:37

User talk:Bukvoed

Return to the user page of "Bukvoed".

M109 imagesEdit

It seems you forgot to add a proper license to these images. Please add them as soon as possible. Thank you ! --Denniss 14:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I forgot to add license tag to all images I uploaded yesterday. I'll fix it. Thanks. Bukvoed 16:30, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Image deletion warningEdit

Thanks for your notice on the subject. I agree that the pictures are identical, so I don't suppose I have to do anything? / Habj 14:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

I think so. The phrasing "if you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion" sounds like if you don't react administrators will delete the image. Bukvoed 14:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your kindly noticing about the deletion requests of Marder images. I'm sorry to have put you to the toil of formalities for deletion requests. --Sciss 03:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh well, I think the word "toil" is a bit strong for a couple of edits :). Anyway, thanks for uploading images of armored fighting vehicles. By now, there are probably thousands of those images here so it's easy not to notice an identical one... and still many AFV-related articles lack photos... Bukvoed 06:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Identification helpEdit

The Armeemuseum Dresden page contain a lot of military hardware, sadly none of it is identified. Could you lend a hand in identifying some of it? Harald Hansen 11:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

OK, I'll take a look. Bukvoed 22:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Great! I've got some of them, but others just mystify me... Harald Hansen 08:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image licenseEdit

Please check your latest uploads, you forgot to add a license. --Denniss 22:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Done. Bukvoed 12:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Tks...Edit

valeu cara por classificar minha imagem... aproposito eu naum a classifiquei porque naum a categorias em português e achei isso uma grandeeeeeee sacanagem com nos (contribuidores brasileiros) por isso mesmo sabendo falar em inglês eu so vou deixar mensagem em português se vc naum entender pede para um dos varios brasileiros que tem aqui traduzir pra ti...flws (that was a message by User:HP Ganesha)

Unfortunately I don't understand portuguese. Automatic online translators didn't really help. I'll try to find somebody to translate it for me. Bukvoed 08:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

ok man... I only say "I'm Brazilian and I love my Country...and because that I very angry because dont have category in portuguse" ok? valeu americano lezo...

See, I am not enforcing english naming here. I am not in position to do it, I have no time for it, and I have little desire to enforce this or almost anything else. Hovewer I do have an opinion and my opinion is:

This site is intended to be a single common media repository for all wikimedia projects. To be effective as such, it absolutely must be easy to search. There are two main search methods: by using the search tool or by following the categories tree. Inconsistent naming (language is not the only problem here) effectively eliminates the former and orphan categories - the latter. Just for example... say you need some images for portuguese wikipedia. Say one of the images you need exists in commons. Say I was the uploader... and being an Israeli who loves his country (yes, not everybody who speaks english is American) I gave the image a hebrew name and placed it in an orphan category with hebrew name. Say other images you need were uploaded by other people who love their countries and used their languages. Will you ever find the images ? May be some of them, if you are lucky. An idiotic situation, isn't it ? A situation that should be avoided, right ? So... lets help each other... lets use the same categories system and the same naming system. Which, unless some magic solution will be found, is likely to include using a common language in many cases. The best candidate for that common language is english for a sole reason that just about every internet dweller knows at least a couple of english words. It may be unfair, it demands an extra effort from you and me but at least it is likely to work better the the aforementioned "patriotic games". Oh, and take a look: Commons:Language policy / Commons:Política de línguas. Have a nice day. Bukvoed 19:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

BATEI HA OSEF PANZER IVEdit

HELLO

PLEASE CONTACT ME VIA MY E_MAIL MUSTANG67-68-43@HOTMAIL.COM ITS ABOUT THOSE PICS OF THE PANZER IV AT BATEI AND LATRUN

THANKS IN ADVANCE RUDI

The mail could not be delivered. If you want to contact me, my email is shurik at lycos.com or you can leave message in my blog ( http://bukvoed.livejournal.com/ ). Bukvoed 14:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Israeli WeaponsEdit

Hi, I loved your pics of Israeli weapons. As you can see, I was also in Latrun and took some pictures, but I had lighting problems because of these half-tents. How did you solved these problems? MathKnight 17:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, both of us visted the Independence Day exhibition... you could very well be one of those people I banged into trying to get to a position for shooting :). See, I'm not very experienced photographer and I don't have solutions except some things I'm sure you are familiar with. I just try to choose a position so that the object will be as brightly and uniformly lit as possible and so that to avoid shooting against very brightly lit background. In some cases "fill flash" mode, exposure compensation and spot metering help, although I don't use these very often. And I take as many pictures as the battery allows, so after the bad ones go to the recycle bin I still have something to keep :). As for the rest, the credit goes to Canon for their excellent G5. Bukvoed 06:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. MathKnight 12:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Imperial War Museum picturesEdit

Hello Bukvoed. I've noticed that you've uploaded a large amount of material from the IWM (very nice BTW) and was wondering if you could help me out a bit. I notice that the ones you upload don't have the watermark on them, which I can't seem to avoid. Can you upload for me photograph E 3660? Oberiko 04:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello. The pictures I've uploaded don't have the watermark because they are cropped. Actually, I tried to remember to upload both variants: the original one (just in case) and then to "override" it with the cropped one (without large pieces of empty sky/land/... and without the watermark). So, unfortunately no, I don't have access to pre-marked versions and I don't know a method of removing watermarks. Sorry. Bukvoed 06:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Merkava picturesEdit

Hi Bukvoed

I saw that the Merkava pictures are taken by yourself. I am the editor-in-chief of the Tank Museum News of the Belgian Royal Army Museum. We are preparing right now an article about the Merkava. Could you contact me at this adress? tankmuseumnews@hotmail.com

I'd like to use some of your pics to illustrate the article. Thanks.

Peter

RequestEdit

Could you please check that I have tagged Image:Lublinyeshiva.jpg correctly? I took the image from Hebrew Wikipedia, but unfortunately I do not know that language at all, so I simply made reasonable guesses as to the author and license information. Thanks in advance. Balcer 22:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

The tag in HebWiki says "The user who uploaded this image, <user name>, declares that he renounces all author's rights for the image and releases it into public domain". So your guesses seem to be correct. Bukvoed 12:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Categories vs. galleriesEdit

Please leave category information in place after you have added images to galleries. Both ways of looking at and searching through images are valid and have their own value. Removing pre-existing and correct information is counter productive. Thanks for your understanding. Kind regards, Siebrand 15:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Please also see Categories and Galleries (revisited). Siebrand 12:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Old AA guns at Batey ha-Osef MuseumEdit

Hi,

Thanks for sharing your pictures of this museum's remarkable collection. Do you have an idea how old AA guns such as the 13.2 mm Hotchkiss and the early 20 mm Oerlikon eventually reached Israel? Thanks PpPachy 14:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't know when and how these specific models were obtained. Most likely, they were purchased in late 40s or 50s somewhere in Europe, as was most of the WW2 and pre-WW2 era stuff. Bukvoed 09:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks PpPachy 23:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Patton tank identificationEdit

Image:Patton-Dozer-latrun-1.jpg - M48 or M60 ? I categorise Patton tanks and i dont know where i shuld drop that image --Pmgpmg 18:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd say it's M60. See the image talk page for discussion.
Also... in my humble opinion, the names of the new categories are not unique enough. There probably were/are a lot of pieces of US military equipment and other things called M46 (or M47/M48/M60). I think "M46 Patton", "M47 Patton", "M48 Patton" would be much better. M60, however, was never officially known as Patton. Perhaps "M60 tank" ? :Bukvoed 13:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
It is an M60 tank. It looks a little different from US versions because it has the low-profile cupola. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.128.106 (talk • contribs)

Image:Ostin_putilovets_6704_1.jpgEdit

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Ostin_putilovets_6704_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zimin Vas 19:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Image of Atomic Annie ?Edit

Hi Bukvoed, I see you have a big interest in artillery and recently recatalogued an image of Atomic Annie... can you look at Image:VWM240mmAtomicAnnie01.jpg - it looks incorrectly labelled, compared to Image:M65 Atomic canon 2.jpg regards. Rcbutcher (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi. The gun does look like Atomic Annie without its prime mover(s). And according to [1] Virginia War Museum is supposed to possess one of those. Of course it's 280 mm, not 240 mm. Bukvoed (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Sopwith CamelEdit

This photo you took of a wrecked Sopwith Camel in Australia, do you know, was it a real Camel, or was it a replica aircraft? It looks authentic. Did you really take this picture in Jan 2007 and its just sitting out in the weather rotting away? Like wow. I love Camels, i would love to rescue this from destruction from the weather and elements somehow. How big is the museum, is it out in the middle of nowhere? starguy

The museum is pretty small, seems like private collection. It is located on the outskirts of Melbourne, you can find the map, address and phone here: [2]. It has two WWI era german guns, another gun barrel, about a dozen of carriages / limbers / field kitchens, a few machine guns and rifles, some other equipment, photos et cetera. Plus one 25 pdr in the backyard. And, of course, the Camel in the open. Unfortunately, I don't know if it is real; when I visited the museum, I was primarily interested in artillery.
If you want to help, I guess you can contact the owner. Bukvoed (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


Thanks. It looks authentic, because the engine is still in it, and those rotaries are too valuable for a kit builder to abandon to rust. I had already found their address via a web search, and zoomed in on them via satellite view. I will be writing the museum to see if there's anything I can do; unfortunately I am on the complete other side of the world. Maybe at minimum I can send them money to at least buy a aluminum storage building over it until something can be done.

QuestionEdit

Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1987-062-17A, Ostpreußen, Goldap.jpg

This is an interesting photo. Location is (en:Goldap) and date is 11-44. Can you help categorize it properly? And what is the significance of the text? I think I know but I am not 100% sure given my poor knowledge of the language.balcer (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

The text says in a rhymed form "Soldier ! Don't forgive Majdanek and take vengeance on the beast mercilessly !". I don't see how I can improve the categorization. Bukvoed (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I guess the current categories will have to do. Interesting quote, though as with all the photos from Bundesarchiv, it is highly probable that the sign in the photo was made by the Nazis for propaganda purposes. I am in no position to judge whether it is authentic. balcer (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, if the sign was made by Germans, it's very good job. The wording and overall style seem Soviet to me. The language is correct with one exception - the word "беспощадно" is written "беспощядно", a violation of one of the first mnemonic rules taught in school today, but I can imagine a man with imperfect education, probably not the author of the text, making a mistake like that, it's basically writing the word the way it sounds. And I don't see why a German propaganda poster would concentrate on their own atrocities. However... who knows... Bukvoed (talk) 08:42, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I agree that the sign looks credible, but then again by late 1944 the Germans must have had a lot of propaganda experts who knew Russian well enough. The sign and its photo could have been made to scare the Germans into resisting the Red Army with more determination. As far as I know, the brief incursion of the Red Army into East Prussia in late 1944 was heavily exploited by German propaganda (en:Nemmersdorf massacre etc.) Anyway, given how little information we have, linking the sign to articles in Wikipedia is bound to stir controversy so I will certainly not do it. balcer (talk) 17:00, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Your photos of 4-inch submarine gun at Haifa naval museumEdit

Hi Bukvoed, regarding your photographs of the 4-inch submarine gun at the Haifa naval museum... do you have any information about the model ? I think it's Mark XXIII, based its apparent short length (33-cal), but it would be good if we could attach a more authoritative description to it. EN Wikipedia reports S class submarine as equipped with Mark XXII (40-cal). regards. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't have any additional info. I guess the photo description (4 inch gun of the type used on INS Tanin/Rahav) came from the museum plate. I agree that the gun looks like more Mk XIII. Bukvoed (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Bukvoed!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 08:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

File:SS-571-Nautilus-trials.gifEdit

This image that you uploaded is used in many places in various Wikipedia articles. The German and French versions seem fine, but all the en.wikipedia uses display a red-link: SS-571-Nautilus-trials.gif. I can't see anything wrong, but maybe you can fix it? Thanks. 75.18.196.241 20:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Right, something weird is going on with this file.
The image page says it does not exist, but shows history etc.: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SS-571-Nautilus-trials.gif
The enwiki image page shows the image correctly and says it's from commons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SS-571-Nautilus-trials.gif
Uhm... interesting... Bukvoed (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

File:VE-day-parade-moscow.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:VE-day-parade-moscow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 07:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jaljulia-53.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jaljulia-53.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jaljulia-53.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   17:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I see that somebody had already deleted the file. Judging by tue file name, the file was probably a photo of Category:Abul-Awn_mosque_in_Jaljulia, taken by me. I have no idea what was missing in the description, descriptions of other files in the categry seem ok. Bukvoed (talk) 07:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

use of one of your images in a bookEdit

Hi, I am designing a book (biography) in which the author wants to use a photo of the Negba water tower. Your image of the tower is by far the best I have found. Please could you tell me whether it is OK to use it in the book (it will have a printrun of about 1000) and what credit line you would like included. I am a new user on Wikimedia, so please forgive my ignorance about how it works! Many thanks!

Hi. Sorry for letting you wait, I didn't log in for about two weeks. It is completely OK to to use the photo in the book. As for credit line, "Photo by Bukvoed" will be enough. Bukvoed (talk) 05:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Your photos of military vehicles.Edit

Dear Bukvoed,

I am an editor of the website www.military-vehicle-photos.com and we would like to have your great and very special photo's of military vehicles you made over there. That would be a great asset to our site. We will of course contribute the photo's to you if you agree. Regards, Alf The Netherlands.

Hello Alf,
You can use my photos as long as they are attributed to me.
Bukvoed (talk) 11:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I will do that. Regards, Alf

Type 59 identified as D-74Edit

Could you please tell me how do you know that this gun is a D-74 and not a Type 59-1?(http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iraqi_Type_59_130_mm_field_gun.JPEG) --Mircea87 (talk) 18:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Judging by this description ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisstreckfus/3039678354/ ) it seems I was wrong and it's Type 59. Bukvoed (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:LVTA4-amp31.JPGEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:LVTA4-amp31.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I have done my best to provide image info. However, the source page is not online now, so there is little I could do. Bukvoed (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Не подскажете, откуда розовая двухфунтовка?Edit

Фото залито из ивритской Википедии. Ain92 (talk) 16:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Не указано :(. Попробую спросить автора (http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%A9:ROSENMAN424). Bukvoed (talk) 13:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Автор пишет, что фотография сделана на какой-то военной базе недалеко от Рамлы. Bukvoed (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Понятненько, по такому описанию категорию поставить затруднительно. =( Ain92 (talk) 04:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Шерман в ЛатрунеEdit

С чего вы взяли, что это (File:M4A4-Sherman-latrun-1.jpg, File:M4A4-Sherman-latrun-2.jpg, File:M4A4-Sherman-latrun-3.jpg) –А4? На М4А4 литую НЛД, насколько мне известно, не ставили. Сравните с остальными M4A4 Sherman. Ain92 (talk) 04:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Допускаю, что ошибся, но ПМСМ судя по расстоянию между катками соседних тележек у этого танка удлиннённый корпус. Bukvoed (talk) 10:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Вы это расстояние на глаз меряли? Действительно, кажется, что оно ближе к M4A4 (у него НЛД от М3 Ли, как у остальных), чем к M4A3. А как вы узнали про двигатель? По выхлопной системе? Ain92 (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Да, на глаз; кажется, у меня валялась где-то фотография куска ходовой этого танка прямо сбоку, там немного лучше видно. Двигатель - по выхлопным трубам, а также по крышке МО ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M4A4-Sherman-latrun-7.jpg ). Мне смутно кажется, что я читал где-то упоминание об наличии в Израиле танков с корпусом от М4А4 и дизелем от М4А2, но беглый поиск в сети находит только Египет ( [3] ). Кстати, бывший египетский Шерман в Латруне (с башней от AMX-13) именно такой, по тем же признакам. Bukvoed (talk) 13:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Вот ещё пара слов на тему, кроме того, они на А4 и звездообразные движки ставили. А вот не знаете ли вы ставили ли неродные моторы на М50 и М51, сделанные из М4А4 (у нас даже есть пример, пруф)?
Спасибо. Да, и звездообразный Континентал ставили; насколько я понимаю, это французская модернизация под названием М4А4Т ( [4] ).
Существовало 2 варианта М50. Ранние танки имели "вертикальную" подвеску и двигатели Континентал. Поздние - "горизонтальную" и дизели Камминс. На фото явно второй вариант - и по подвеске, и крышка МО похожа на танки с Камминсом (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M51-Isherman-latrun-3.jpg), а не на "родную" М4А4 (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sherman_M4_%28Airborne_Museum%29_03.JPG). Я правда не могу определить, действительно ли танк на фото - бывший М4А4.
М51 все имели двигатель Камминс и вроде все корпуса были от М4А1. Bukvoed (talk) 08:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Sdot Yam photosEdit

Hi Bukvoed,

Are you the same photographer that posted photos from the museum at Sdot Yam on Picasa? I would like to recommend the use of your photo of the statue of Tyche of Caesarea. Is it your photo? Did the museum allow photography? Would you be willing to provide a high resolution version? Please contact me at waltonimagesupply@gmail.com. Thank you for considering my request.

Kim Walton

Answered by e-mail. Bukvoed (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

ЗРК «Керес»Edit

С чего вы взяли, что он устанавливается на шасси пятитонного М809? Шасси, которое на фотографии, очень похоже на 2,5-тонное M35 — об этом, например, свидетельствует «грибок» воздухозаборника с правой стороны от капота, в то время, как у пятитонника воздухозаборник торчит вверх из воздушного фильтра над левым крылом. Ain92 (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Теперь уже не вспомнить, думаю прочитал где-то. Согласен, больше похоже на М35. Bukvoed (talk) 13:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

AA PhotoEdit

This photo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AA-cannon.gif should be labeled 452nd AA Battalion. Not 4520. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.128.106 (talk • contribs)

Thanks, fixed. Bukvoed (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

ЕрамбаEdit

Извините за беспокойство, но почему файл Puckapunyal-Yeramba-2.jpg есть, а файла с номером 1 или без номера нет? Не помешало бы ещё одно фото, если оно у вас имеется, конечно. Ain92 (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Если номер пропущен, скорее всего это означает, что файл был забракован из-за сильного сходства с другим или скверного качества. Но я проверю, если что - залью. Bukvoed (talk) 10:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Две просьбыEdit

Ещё раз здравствуйте. Во-первых, переведите, пожалуйста File:Flickr_-_Israel_Defense_Forces_-_Hezbollah_Rockets_Found_in_Itron.jpg. Во-вторых, обращаю ваше внимание на [5] и [6]. Можно ли попросить ботоводов как-нибудь связать гифки низкого разрешения с изображениями хорошего качества? Заранее спасибо.

1) На нижней: "бомба ... 66 мм противотанковая / осколочная А4 модификация 1 серия т.д. 1-02". На верхней "...проникающая А6 модификация 1 серия т.д. 1-01"
2) Не знаю. Bukvoed (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
  1. Спасибо, опознал как американский грантомёт М72.
  2. Загляните на мою СО, администратор отказался поставить редирект, так как «это разные форматы». Вы что-нибудь знаете об этом толковании правила? И не подскажете ли, что нужно делать, чтобы во всех разделах заменять изображение низкого разрешения на высококачественное? Ain92 (talk) 17:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
ПМСМ можно было смело удалять те гифы, но я не силён в правилах и их толковании. Bukvoed (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Когда я на прошлой неделе начал разгребать British Army 1939-1945, то вновь стал натыкаться на копии низкого разрешения, загруженные вами в 2006 году. К слову, вы их все руками загружали или при помощи бота? Так или иначе, на сей раз они формат jpg, так что админы удаляют их без вопросов и до поры до времени мне не надоедало помечать их руками. =) Но когда я создал из части фото категорию Tanks and AFVs of the British Army 1939–1945 и British Tanks and Armoured Fighting Vehicles 1939–1945, то столкнулся с тем, что почти каждое третье фото дублируется. В связи с этим написал загрузчику всех этих тысяч изображений, так что можете высказаться тут. Ain92 (talk) 19:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Руками. Дупликаты, конечно, надо поудалять. Если у меня образуется свободное время, я пройдусь по этим категориям и поищу дупликаты. Но не обещаю :(. Bukvoed (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File:IWM-TR-1496-Morris-LRC-Azores-194401.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IWM-TR-1496-Morris-LRC-Azores-194401.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 09:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. It's ok to delete it. Bukvoed (talk) 15:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Одно интересное орудиеEdit

У вас не найдётся ещё одного снимка вот этого колеса? В связи с [7] хотелось бы узнать типоразмер шины и количество шпилек в диске. Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Залил ещё пару снимков этой пушки с других ракурсов, но не думаю, что они помогут: 1, 2. Bukvoed (talk) 20:25, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

ISU-152 photoEdit

[8] Want to correct, machine on this photo is actually БТТ-1 on Russian, whick means ArmoredTankTractor-1, tractor based on ISU-152. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dosenoffner (talk • contribs)

Thanks, but it is not. There are 3 ISU-based vehicles in Latrun. The only one with wheels and tracks painted in white is ISU-152: [9], [10]. The other two have black wheels and tracks. One of them is ISU with gun removed, labeled as command vehicle [11], [12]; however, I think it's ISU-T tractor. The last is BTT-1 [13], [14]; it is easily recognizable by rear spade and platform above engine compartment. Bukvoed (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

File:WMD-cleansing-vehicle-batey-haosef-1.jpgEdit

Поясните, пожалуйста, название. Ain92 (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Очевидно, это какая-то дезактивационная машина. На табличке было написано "машина очистки ОМП", что я и перевёл таким образом. Было бы правильнее назвать "decontamination vehicle", но в тот момент я это слово не вспомнил. Bukvoed (talk) 09:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Скорее всего, ДДА-53А. Ain92 (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Да, похожа. Bukvoed (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Новую тему заводить не буду, напишу сюда: что написано на табличке на File:Field-kitchen-batey-haosef-1.jpg? Кухня номер 2 — это КП-2-49, опознаётся по полуторочным колёсам с пятью шпильками и пятью окнами и двумя примерно одинаковыми круглыми котлами. Ain92 (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
"Кухня полевая военная, производство: Израиль". Bukvoed (talk) 18:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

ЦРУ заделилось картинкамиEdit

Присоединяйтесь! Ain92 (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо, гляну. Bukvoed (talk) 16:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

File:M26 Pershing.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:M26 Pershing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

83.135.165.81 15:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

using image in bookEdit

Hello! I was wondering if I might be granted permission to use one of your images of Umm el-Umdan in my upcoming book (which will have a limited print run). If so, should I credit it as "Photo by Bukvoed" or would you prefer a different caption? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.111.163.96 (talk • contribs)

No problem, you can use it. "Photo by Bukvoed" is ok. Can you please provide some details about the book ? Bukvoed (talk) 14:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)