User talk:Butko/Архив (октябрь 2008)

Обсуждать меня лучше на ru:Обсуждение участника:Butko - там я чаще бываю. --Butko 10:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Selene.jpg

Hello,

I saw you had the category Endymion to the image Image:Selene.jpg. But there is no clue that the man laying is Endymion: Selene had a lot of lovers, and the notice of the image is not explicite—as often... Perhaps you have a good reason to do this, but in this case you should mention it in the notice. Bibi Saint-Pol 20:26, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

How many lovers of Selene is a sleeping man? --Butko 11:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Репродукции

Пожалуйста, ставь тэг {{PD-Art}} если загружаешь репродукции старых картин. Kneiphof 18:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Может лучше загнать его в шаблоны Creator...? --Butko 07:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ares and Aphrodite.jpg

Hi, do you know where this image came from? The version on enwiki didn't have any source and copyright info when you copied it over, and has now been deleted... --Sherool 20:57, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

I see this image only in enwiki --Butko 13:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Information

Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Village pump. Thank you. -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 17:06, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Please stop uploading images to the Commons !

Unless you are able to follow the rules/guidelines for uploading images:

1. Always specify the source your images came from
2. If source is other wikipedia copy the image description text and license info and place the {{NowCommons}} tag to mark this image as moved to the Commons. If text is in other language than english try to translate.
3. If source is the web make sure it is free from copyright, do not upload copyrighted/fair use material !

--Denniss 07:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Template:Изображение

This template has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests. Thuresson 00:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Билеты

Привет. Я по поводу Image:Donetsk-ticked-2.jpg и подобных. Получается я не могу выкладывать в коммонс отсканированные или сфотографированные лично билеты? А если будет фотка, на которой несколько билетов лежат на столе? И как быть, например, с афишами, значками и т.п.? --Butko 09:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Насколько понимаю, в этом случае действует Статья 21. Свободное использование произведения с указанием имени автора Закона Украины "Об авторском праве и смежных правах": Без согласия автора (или другого лица, имеющего авторское право), но с обязательным указанием имени автора и источника заимствования, допускается: 1) использование цитат (коротких отрывков) из опубликованных произведений в объеме, оправданном поставленной целью, в том числе цитирование статей из газет и журналов в форме обзоров прессы, если оно обусловлено критическим, полемическим, научным или информационным характером произведения, в которое цитаты включаются; свободное использование цитат в форме коротких отрывков из выступлений и произведений, включенных в фонограмму (видеограмму) или программу вещания;. Это аналог fair use.

Фотографию киоска, где будут видны разные виды проездных, наверняка можно использовать как свободное изображение, но проездные не должны быть основной частью изображения.

EugeneZelenko 15:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Ещё такой вопрос: Есть ли такой инструмент для Коммонс, который может показать какие из изображений загруженных мной впоследствии были удалены? --Butko 08:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Как раз недавно внедрили :-) Правда он показывает только текущие изменения (удаления, пометки на удаление, перезагрузки и т.д.). Я думаю, что в русской (уже MaxSem попросил :-) и украинских Википедиях он будет очень полезен. Про белорусскую мы пока ещё думаем :-).

Ещё я просил разработчиков сделать специальную страницу, где будут указаны все ссылки на несуществующие файлы.

EugeneZelenko 14:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Я вот подумал, что раз марки попадают под {{PD-UA-exempt}}, то почему билеты нет? В статье 10 закона Украини об авторских и смежных правах говорится, что "символы и знаки предприятий" надодятся в PD. Билет разве не символ или знак транспортного предприятия? --Butko 12:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Наверное, моё сообщение затерялось, но мне хотелось бы получить ответ на запись от 16 ноября--Butko 07:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Прошу прощения, не заметил.

Насколько помню историю с марками, там был судебный прецедент. Если подобный прецедент будет в отношении билетов, то тогда можно будет объявлять их {{PD-UA-exempt}}.

Что касается символов и знаков предприятий, то они могут охраняться как торговые марки. Мне кажется, что билет всё-таки знак оплаты, а не символ предприятия.

EugeneZelenko 15:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Statues of saints

Hello,

You have added “statues categories” to this picture: . In my opinion, it shows a type of sculpture called relief (see Category:Reliefs). So, I think that the more general term “sculpture” would be better than “statue”. --Juiced lemon 11:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok, you are right --Butko 13:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Логотип Шахтёра

Собственно из первых рук: http://shakhtar.com/usloviya.htm. Не знаю, что они запатентовали, но логотип явно может быть торговой маркой. Я поставлю logo в англійской версии.

Кстати, en:Image:Shakhtar-Donetsk.png изначально было logo, но те, кто хочет верить в чудеса, "поправили" :-)

EugeneZelenko 16:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

"Creator"

Re: Image:Ribak i zolotaya ribka.jpg -- the "creator" template would normally be reserved for the sculptor of the statue not the person who took the photograph of the statue (and it could be viewed as egotistical to set up a "Creator:" template for yourself). Please add information on the original sculptor of the statue. Thank you. AnonMoos 08:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I change my description to {{Photographer}}. I add information on the original sculptor of the statue when I find it. This is old work, and find information about sculptor is very hard, possibly, it located in archives --Butko 08:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, "Photographer:" is better than "Creator:". AnonMoos 16:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate declarations

Why are you putting Duplicate declarations on pairs of rather different images, such as Image:Danae recibiendo la lluvia de oro Tiziano 1553.jpg and Image:Tizian 012.jpg ? It isn't Wikimedia Commons policy, and it isn't too helpful. AnonMoos 23:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry. In future I be more careful. --Butko 06:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bogun.jpg

Hi Butko, no worries. I restored the image. Please be sure to put source and licensing information for all your uploads in the future, to avoid this inconvenience. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 12:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

One more thing - does "Madeevskiy" have an English Wikipedia article? I couldn't find one. When did the author die? If he died after 1937 (somewhat unlikely), I don't think it's free yet. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 12:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I also tagged this image as {{PD-Ukraine}}, creator was died before 1952 --Butko 06:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Is the creator Ukranian? Can you please link his name to an article, in some language Wikipedia? (doesn't have to be English) pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Creator is Ukranian. I will add information about date of creator's death when I find it. --Butko 10:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:Palma-mercalova.jpg

См. User talk:Samulili#Image:Palma-mercalova.jpg. Что-то админ удаливший изображение мне не отвечает. Может быть, ты восстановишь? --Butko 16:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Перед тем, как объявить это изображение {{PD-Art}} и соответственно восстановить, можно ли было бы поискать даты смерти А.Мерцалова и Ф.Шпарина? Я, к сожалению, не знаю, что скрывается за инициалами, а времени искать нет :-(. --EugeneZelenko 15:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Имена создателей - Алексей Иванович Мерцалов, Фёдор Шкарин. Первое упоминание, это участие пальмы на Всероссийской выставке 1896 года (111 лет назад). Ни исходная работа, ни репродукция публикации 1900 года (107 лет назад) не должны попадать под действие авторских прав. В крайнем случае можно поставить не {{PD-Art}}, а {{PD-Ukraine}} - он до 1952 года. --Butko 07:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Builded in year

In English, it is "built" not "builded". Thank you, -- Infrogmation 13:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you --Butko 13:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:HagiaSophiaKiev.jpg

Sorry, this image can't restore--Shizhao 15:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

It was deleted almost 17 months ago - why did you take so long for you to ask for it to be undeleted? There are plenty of similar images in Category:Mosaics in Hagia Sophia and its subcats.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Images

Your user page says you have limited understanding of English so I figured I'd help you out. Most of your images were rejected because they don't fit the size guidelines which require the images to be at least 2 million pixels (or very close). For example, 2000 x 1000 pixels or roughly 1400 x 1400 pixels. Some of the reviewers are very picky about what we include so wouldn't get too discouraged when your images are rejected. If you listen to it, their criticism will help you grow as a photographer.

Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions. Calibas 00:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you --Butko 06:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

• Your latest submissions to QIC look very good, but I notice many have very short descriptions. The date and place for each image would be useful, and is that Phalacrocorax carbo dead?. Good luck :-) --Tony Wills 14:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I improve descriptions --Butko 06:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Creator:Andrew Butko

Hi Andrew, would you mind using Template:Information instead/additionally to your template? Please change it so one doesn't confuse it with the "regular" creator templates like Creator:Georg Flegel. Maybe you also want to take a look at Commons:user templates. Best regards, --Flominator 10:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

OK, I fix this later --Butko 06:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I Request for AWB for this work --Butko 06:14, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Done. I remove this template from my photos --Butko 13:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I deleted your template. Was this ok? Regards, --Flominator 16:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

OK --Butko 06:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicates

Saporischja-oblast.COA.png was not really a duplicate even it was in the duplicate category. To mention is that it was also categorised under Category:Universally replaced by CommonsDelinker.
Saporischja-oblast.COA.png looked as if the creator hasn't used the right colour.
Moreover, why should we keep Saporischja-oblast.COA.png if Coat of Arms of Zaporizhzhya Oblast.gif is a better version.
--D-Kuru 08:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Food images

Hi, Your recent food image pictures look quite good. Can you add some description on their pages? I've nominated one of them for QI, some may even reach FP. спасибо. Lycaon 07:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I add descriptions today, but some later --Butko 07:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

User:Butko/Info

Hi Butko,

You still have over 250 images that use this "template". Are you going to change them to use {{Information}}? We need everyone to use the same template so that it is standardised. --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 11:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Butko.jpg

Shall I delete the old, unsourced version? ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 15:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Unsourced version Deleted --Butko 09:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Images of dragonflies, Ab insect 008.jpg, Ab insect 032.jpg, Ab insect 033.jpg, Ab insect 034.jpg

Hi Butko, I specified the four dragongflies and wrote the names into the image descriptions, except for #034. 034 seems to be a female specimen of Orthetrum cancellatum. Please, move the pictures from the category "unidentified odonata" by removing this category from the description. You can add them to the appropriate species categories, if you think, there are not yet enough pictures of these species in good quality or views there. Best regards G-u-t 18:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)g-u-t

Thank you for help. I think Image:Ab insect 034.jpg, Image:Ab insect 008.jpg, Image:Ab insect 033.jpg is one species. See this photograhy --Butko 08:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Altuna_picture_stone.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Altuna_picture_stone.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 14:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Поздравляем, дорогой администратор!

Подарок нашему новому администратору от товарищей...

Поздравляем, дорогой Butko! Теперь у Вас есть права администратора Викисклада. Перед тем, как приступить к работе со страницей удалений, страницей защиты, блокировке учётных записей или изменению защищенных страниц — найдите, пожалуйста, время, чтобы изучить страницу Commons:Administrators и страницы, за которыми нужно следить (в частности, Commons:Administrators' noticeboard и Commons:Deletion requests). Большинство действий администраторов могут быть отменены другими администраторами, за исключением объединения истории, к которому следует относиться с особым вниманием.

Пожалуйста, не стесняйтесь, присоединиться к нам на IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net.

EugeneZelenko 15:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Спасибо. Теперь тебя разгружу от своих запросов в очевидных случаях ;) --Butko 15:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Shroud of Turin 001.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Shroud of Turin 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--User:G.dallorto 19:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:Modern parsunas

Не посмотрите, драгоценный администратор? Не знаю, как с этим на викискладе - но по поводу всего вот этого у меня большие сомнения по значимости. Это художество какого-то современного протоирея, который сам все это загрузил. --Shakko 11:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Думаю, что правилам Викисклада вполне соответствует. Требования к содержимому регулируются вот этим правилом - Commons:Рамки проекта. Другой вопрос - использование их в какой-нибудь статье. Это можно решить в обсуждении самой статьи. Там они могут оказаться незначимыми и статья будет проиллюстрирована более аутентичными работами --Butko 12:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

ну, на мой взгляд, это авторские арт-работы, ну ладно, пусть живет :) --Shakko 13:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

насколько я знаю, авторские арт-работы правилами не запрещены. нельзя только частные фото с вечеринок и т.п. --Butko 15:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Злоупотребление {{PD-UA-exempt}}

Если будет время, пожалуйста загляни в User talk:Yakudza#Злоупотребление PD-UA-exempt. --EugeneZelenko 15:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Категории

А есть ли какой-нибудь робот, которого можно напустить на Category:Ikonostas, чтобы он перенес из нее все содержимое в Category:Iconostasis? --Shakko 13:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

 Done --Butko 14:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

thanks :* you're the best )--Shakko 15:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

можно то же самое: из Category:Death of the Virgin и Category:Death of Mary в Category:Dormition of Virgin Mary? --Shakko 13:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

а там пишут такое: «For similar images from Western Christianity, please see Category:Death of the Virgin». Может быть как-то это обсудить сначала с авторами категорий? Может, такое разделение было сделано не случайно? --Butko 13:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

хотя, в этом случае название категории не отражает различия. --Butko 13:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

 Done --Butko 14:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)

В последнне время переносит много изображений с украинской Википедии. Многие из них с сомнительными лицензиями (например, Image:Bondarenko Alona.jpg). Ты не мог бы заняться Category:Files moved from uk.wikipedia to Commons requiring review и при необходимости обсудить проблему в украинской Википедии? --EugeneZelenko 16:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

попробую --Butko 07:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pskov nativity salomea.jpg

Не проставила лицензию на свое фото иконы, пока отдыхала, бот её убил. Оригинала вроде не могу найти пока и перезагрузить заново. Можно что-нибудь сделать, в смысле восстановить с сервера, или уже все?--Shakko 17:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

ButkoBot

Андрей, утихомирьте, пожалуйста своего робота, а то он мне вот такую рамочку повесил, а ведь так черным по белому сказано: По любым вопросам лицензионного характера, а также с комментариями, свяжитесь с IPV News USA по адресу info@ipvnews.org. Фотографии были предоставлены мне лично, ни на какой странице в интернете их нет. Поэтому проверить это можно только написав по указанному мной адресу. спасибо.

И еще... Насчет 2) Отправьте, пожалуйста, копию письма от IPV News USA & MELNIKOFF Galleries Network в OTRS по адресу permissions@wikimedia.org. Вам тогда должен прийти ответ с таким заголовком «Re: Ticket#номер...». Напишите этот номер, пожалуйста. Я уже два раза им писал - никто не ответил. Пожалуйста..

P.S. Я, в очередной раз заблокирован, поэтому писать могу только на этой странице. Мое почтение..--Kwasura 15:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

1) Вы пишете, что фотографии были предоставлены Вам лично, но на сайте http://exhibition.ipvnews.org есть галерея фотографий Я указал ссылки на фото ru:Изображение:015b.jpg, ru:Изображение:006b.jpg и думаю, что Вы можете найти и остальные. Те, что не найдёте, так и напишите, что эту фотографию мне лично прислали, желательно копию письма с фотографией отправить на permissions@wikimedia.org и в описании указать номер тикета 2) я написал письмо на info@ipvnews.org, жду ответа --Butko 07:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

3) Почему Вы пишете на детских рисунках, что их автор Наталья Медведева? - например, ru:Изображение:Children 09b.jpg --Butko 08:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

1) Андрей, я же уже сказал, что их там нет. И я уже два раза писал в permissions@wikimedia.org Я тоже об этом уже сказал. И номер тикета мне никто не прислал.

2) Хорошо.

3) Потому, что она это сфотографировала. Поэтому я упомянул ее в названии. Автор известен только для двух фото. Остальные - неизвестен. Так так и указано.

--Kwasura 22:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Там, где автор неизвестен разрешение Натальи Медведевой ничего не даёт - такие изображения несвободны по умолчанию --Butko 09:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Urgent mail

Hello Butko. Please have a look at your emails, it's urgent. Regards, DerHexer 18:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I read e-mail and confirm my account --Butko 06:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Категории

Не переименуете Category:Prince of Asturias в Category:Princes of Asturias? - почему-то не множественное число, а единственное тут у них. --Shakko 20:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bilibin_yaroslav.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Bilibin_yaroslav.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Kelly 04:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

metrophoto.iatp.org.ua

Уважаемый, все фотографии загруженны с полным разрешением автора, Сергей "Корж" Добрицкого. Вот его личная анкета на форуме где в 2006-м году я попросил разрешения. А вот его личный ответ мне на вопрос можно ли с сайта брать фотографии. К сожалению контакт с автором с тех пор был прерван, но если прочитать его сообщения на этом форуме можно трезво сделать вывод, что именно он автор сайта и его личное сообщение не сфальцифицированное. Более того, заметьте дату сообщения, все фотографии были загруженны в июне 2006- го года. Тогда небыло таких жестких прав о лицензии и на протяжении двух лет автор знал о том что его фотографии весят на википедии и не подал ни одну жалобу... --Kuban kazak 13:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Более того я послал ему и-мейл с нужным бланком на его адрес toshka_83@mail.ru. Но вы уж подождите стерать пока. --Kuban kazak 13:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Леда и лебедь.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Леда и лебедь.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Gustav VH 18:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab plant 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough -- Alvesgaspar 18:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A very nice image, but unfortunately slightly overexposed. And the same applies to the next three images of the same author. Barabas 21:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Of the four images, this is one of two where the overexposure is pretty minor. It's just undetailed white spots anyway and the color shift is barely noticeable. The lighting is pleasing and does not appear fake. The sharpness is good. Ram-Man 02:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The overexposure on this image is very minor. I would not want it exposed any less. Otherwise, it is a fine shot of record. Ram-Man 02:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab plant 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus is not really fixed but I like the global effect. --B.navez 04:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Caragana arborescens

Hi, In order to promote it as QI, I have renamed your picture “Image:Ab plant 34.jpg” into “Image:Caragana arborescens flower.jpg” because the name you gave doesn't suit the naming rules on Commons.
Congratulations for you contributions.
--B.navez 14:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab train 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! Please add description in English, French or German. -- MJJR 21:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, soft light. Arria Belli 19:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab food 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Lycaon 05:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus padus 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good surgery. --B.navez 02:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JCB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp, interesting perspective. --Mbdortmund 11:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caragana arborescens flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me OK but rename first. --B.navez 14:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC) renaming done --B.navez 14:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab mollusca 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nothing wrong except the name which is at least marked to be repaired. -- carol 03:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab insect 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunately too small (needs to be 2megapixels or larger) -- Peripitus 13:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC) re-nomination: I upload bigest version --Butko 05:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC) I like this now. The small DOF works well with the subject angle - Peripitus 06:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab insect 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a nice image and love to support it but it's not the minimum 2 megapixels Bidgee 13:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC) re-nomination: I upload bigest version --Butko 05:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC) seems good to me. --LC-de 16:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ab insect 070.jpg

Two excellent photos Close to Anthrax anthrax Bombyliidae. Post to Diptera.info for a certain identification.Cheers Robert akaNotafly (talk) 09:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for help and advice. Maybe help in identifying the behaviour of these flies. They fly above the ground and often sit on it. I photographed them in early July in Donetsk. Coordinates: 48°00′10″N 37°48′19″E Butko (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Герб Алчевска

И что из этого современный герб Алчевска?:

• 
  Герб из FOTW.net
• 
  Герб из geraldika.ru
• 
  Герб из heraldry.com.ua

--Ahonc (talk) 09:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Написал ru:Герб Алчевска. Под блазонирование, которое описано на "украинской геральдике" попадает Image:Coat of Arms of Alchevsk (1993-1998).png (у него единственного есть золотая глава с чёрной надписью). Это герб, утверждённый 2 февраля 1993 года. Если были какие-то изменения, то они должны приниматься официально. В положении о символике, наградах и поощрениях в городе Алчевске за 2003 год написано, что герб, флаг, штандарт, гимн, их описание и порядок использования утверждены решением городского совета от 10.12.98 № 8/8 "Про зміст, опис та порядок використання символіки територіальної громади міста Алчевськ". Нужно найти текст этого постановления и тогда ситуация прояснится.

В статьях Евгения Малахи я читал, что по требованиям Украинского геральдического общества французские щиты (с остриём внизу) сейчас меняются на испанский (полукруглый), так что по этим критериям как более новый подходит Image:Герб Алчевска.png, но в переписке с Владимиром Мартыненко он мне написал, что по желанию Андрея Богдановича Гречило все гербы Украины должны иметь "испанский" щит. Поэтому, в своей книге "Гречило А. Герби та прапори міст і сіл України. Львів, 2004. Ч.І." он все гербы перерисовал в "испанском" щите (цветные иллюстрации), зачастую, изменяя рисунок герба так, чтобы разместить рисунок в "испанском" щите. При этом в описательной части книга Андрей Богданович приводит черно-белые рисунки гербов во "французском" щита. Т.е. в приводит рисунок решения об утверждении герба. А в описаниях гербов оставил везде упоминание о том, что герб имеет "французский" щит. Так что версия герба на испанском щите может быть более современной, но неофициальной --Butko (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ab spider 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DOF is a bit lowish, but still barely QI for me. --Dschwen 14:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

image:Василий Шуйский.jpg и image:Царевич Димитрий.jpg

Перегрузила из рувики сюда загруженные Vizu картинки, и он теперь волнуется[1], что их тут могут стереть из-за названия файла кириллицей. Можно ли для спокойствия переименовать их в латиницу? карточку описания на английском я заполнила уже. --Shakko (talk) 11:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Только из-за названия их никто не сотрёт. Нужна какая-нибудь более веская причина.--Ahonc (talk) 11:44, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

1) Да, кириллица в названии не может быть причиной удаления. 2) В любом случае, если будут недоразумения, то удалённое изображение легко восстанавливается (по-моему, изображения хранятся около года после удаления). 3) Для переименования можно использовать шаблон {{rename|новое_имя}} - тогда изображение будет перезагружено ботом под новым именем --Butko (talk) 04:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Я сам использую кириллицу, например, см. Category:Wassilij Wassiljewitsch Wereschtschagin. При правильном описании (автор, источник, шаблон лицензии) никаких вопросов не возникает --Butko (talk) 04:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

По поводу {{Rename}} там не так вё просто. У бота есть список определённых участников (trusted users), которые могут переименовывать. Если на странице изображение последнюю правку сделал такой участник, то изображение "переименовыаается", если же правку сделал другой участник, то бот пишет rename failed.Ahonc (talk) 08:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Сделали !

Приветствую. Зря был поднят этот вопрос про Commons:Categories for discussion/Current requests/2008/06/Category:Kharkiv, все равно мы вас, донецких, на раз сделали ! И никакие сторонники фофудьи помочь никогда не смогут. И никакого консенсуса не нужно, главное вовремя подвести итог да выбрать для этого правильного админа с правильными взглядами. Так что не нужно впредь поднимать тут такие темы, договорились ? Вот и ладушки. Спокойной ночи  ! --Spirit of Crow (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flowers of Robinia pseudoacacia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Excellent highlight handling, but before promoting please rename your images using the {{Rename}} template. –Dilaudid 16:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC) I rename image --Butko 06:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC) QI. –Dilaudid 17:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flower of Tragopogon dubius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit hard light, but still a good photograph. Estrilda 16:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flowers of Chelidonium majus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems that lighting was just harsh on this day, there are still details on the flowers though. Frequent downloaders should appreciate the more descriptive filenames. -- carol 11:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:1981._Тренировочный_барк_Товарищ.jpg

Кажется, что вместо "Тренировочный" должно быть "Трёхмачтовый". Thanks! --Amble (talk) 08:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

ага, спасибо. переименую --Butko (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

wondering

Hi, I'm wondering why you are tagging known sculptors in Image:Laurier monument Feb 2005.jpg or Image:John Forrest statue.jpg or Image:Rod Laver.jpg and so on ...... as unknown sculptors? The Germans use the word sinnfrei for such activities. Why don't you help us instead to find out especially the Ukrainian mysteries? Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 17:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Shroudofturin.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Shroudofturin.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Category:Stamps of Poland

Good job on Category:Stamps of Poland. Much appreciated. --Jarekt (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you --Butko (talk) 05:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Intellectual property in Vietnam

Hi, Butko. You pointed out a few days ago that the license i had applied to images of Vietnamese stamps was wrong. I've done a bit of research since then. [Here is an example http://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%ACnh:Bo-tem-VN-dau-tien.jpg] of licensing from the Vietnamese Wikipedia. I have tried to translate the template there. This is the result (which should be checked by a native speaker of the Vietnamese language):

This image is in the public domain because copyright has expired in Vietnam. According to [Vietnamese law on intellectual property, 2005 http://vietlaw.gov.vn/LAWNET/downloaddoc?id=18980&type=doc]:

•Photographic works are protected for fifty years after the initial publication, after which this protection expires.

•Works that are not photographic are protected throughout the lifetime of the author plus fifty years, calculated from the year the author dies; in works where several authors have contributed, protection expires in the fiftieth year after the year the last of the authors die.

Do you think we could arrange for a template to be prepared for future use? I don't know how to do that. Perhaps you have a suggestion? (Please respond here, rather than on my talk page). Thanks, Alfons Åberg (talk) 06:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)