Last modified on 25 September 2013, at 15:18

User talk:Cayambe/Archive1

  • Discussion
Return to the user page of "Cayambe/Archive1".

ARCHIVE1 = ARCHIVE 2010

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. | style="padding:0 0.5em;" | | style="width:55%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#f1f5fc;" |

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola gnome-fs-trash-full.svg Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
  • For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Villa Vauban Luxembourg parc 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Vauban Luxembourg parc 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City from Adolphe Bridge 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City from Adolphe Bridge 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Pfaffenthal Alzette Béinchen 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Pfaffenthal Alzette Béinchen 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Casino Luxembourg bd Roosevelt 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casino Luxembourg bd Roosevelt 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Luxembourg_Kirchberg_A_De_Gasperi_entrance_01.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Luxembourg_Kirchberg_A_De_Gasperi_entrance_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I don't believe this infringes Luxembourg copyright law. You can see my explanations at:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Philharmonie_of_Luxembourg.JPG

Ipigott (talk) 11:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

FPEdit

Guten Tag, Claude!
Bitte, ergreife die Nomination nicht. Ich denke, das Foto wird nicht entfernt sein. Die Nomination hat die guten Chancen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Pfaffenthal church 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Pfaffenthal church 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Wilno - kosciol sw. Kazimierza.JPGEdit

Thank you for your support. Can you sign? :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 11:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb Saeul church 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Saeul church 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Pafendall Sang a Klang 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Pafendall Sang a Klang 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Luxembourg, structure de la forteresse, vallée de la Pétrusse et Pont AdolpheEdit

Bonjour !
Jolie photo et bel endroit que je connais, comme tu sais !
Puis-je toutefois te signaler un petit problème ? dans le ciel, juste au dessus de l'immeuble sous échafaudages, tu as essayé de faire disparaître quelque chose, mais ça se voit beaucoup, même sur la vignette. Je pense que tu dois pouvoir arranger ça. Je supporterai alors volontiers cette photo. Bien cordial, sincère et très amical salut vers le Luxembourg, depuis Paris (si tu vois ce que je veux dire...).--Jebulon (talk) 16:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Je vois que tu n'as pas attendu lundi, et je vois aussi que j'ai été devancé pour soutenir ton image ! --Jebulon (talk) 20:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Je veux bien ! Tu devrais faire comme moi avec mon Jules César. Archéo l'avait promu, puis il m'a fait un commentaire sur ma page perso auquel j'ai acquiescé. Alors j'ai arrangé selon son souhait, et je l'ai mis sur la "revue", comme ça c'est carré (mais il n'y a que lui et moi dans cette histoire, c'est un peu différent pour ta photo). Si tu mentionnes des améliorations après la promotion, alors je la confirmerai, je crois que c'est le mieux. Es-tu d'accord ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Chose promise, chose due ! ça me parait parfait comme ça. Tout est clair !--Jebulon (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Hôtel de Ville de GuadixEdit

  • Bonsoir mon camarade !


A ton tour maintenant ! J'ai corrigé l'image en QIC, et j'ai mis une note. Peux-tu confirmer la promotion par ton vote amical ? Merci !--Jebulon (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

QIC assessmentsEdit

Hey, you are in the wrong month! Or have you used a time machine ;-) ?
I'm going to correct some of your mistakes, but maybe you could look by yourself if you found some, too (and please correct the problem at your computer). Regards --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Mensch, da hab ich mir extra Mühe mit dem übersetzen gemacht, wo ich hätte Deutsch sprechen können...^^ Ich hatte schon seit ein paar Tagen immer wieder die promoteten Bilder gesehen und mich heute nun wirklich gewundert, warum der QICBot die nicht archivieren wollte. Aber jetzt kennen wir ja das Problem. Danke für die Korrekturen! Viele Grüße --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City fortress Petrusse valley 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City fortress Petrusse valley 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Place d'Armes (Luxembourg)Edit

Hi Cayambe, I saw you took many quality images of Luxembourg, and wonder if you have any in your collection of the Place d'Armes, which I'm preparing a DYK nomination for? --Elekhh (talk) 22:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for you quick reply. It appears that even without scaffolding is hard to take a good image of the square because of the many trees. Anyway, if you get the opportunity one day to take a good image think of placing it in the article, or just let me know you uploaded it. Cheers, --Elekhh (talk) 23:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh that's very kind of you, but is no rush any more, as the DYK has been already processed without lead image and will appear on the main page on 8 October at 8am (Luxembourg time). --Elekhh (talk) 23:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon front 03.jpgEdit

I looked at the bottom of the tower, perhaps I was wrong. Anyway, I am impressed with all the nice pictures from Luxembourg you have uploaded. Best regards--Ankara (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that the walls of the tower are not perfectly vertical, neither at the base nor more upwards,. The tower was erected in the 1920s. Thanks for the compliment, which I'd like to send back to you, for your pictures from Sweden and many other places in the world. Cheers, --Cayambe (talk) 20:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Port de NiceEdit

Bonsoir Cayambe, J'ai téléchargé une nouvelle version suivant ton conseil : File:Nice port.jpg. Te semble-t-elle mieux ? Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 19:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon front 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon front 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Sichenhaff cemetery 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Sichenhaff cemetery 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

signatureEdit

Please, see this. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 10:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

Kehlen chapelle rue d Olm int 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kehlen chapelle rue d Olm int 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kehlen chapelle rue d Olm int 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb City échauguette montée Pfaffenthal 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb City échauguette montée Pfaffenthal 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

KirchbergEdit

Bonjour Cayambe, J'ai inséré ton image du plateau du Kirchberg dans fr:Kirchberg (Luxembourg), et je me suis permis de développer la description en français car les annotations ne s'affichent pas sous fr:WP. Bien amicalement --Myrabella (talk) 07:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Sichenhaff 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Sichenhaff 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image choisie en image du jour sur :frEdit

Bonjour,

Je viens de choisir File:Kehlen chapelle rue d Olm int 01.jpg en image du jour de WP:fr pour le 1er novembre. Afin d'être sûr que la relation entre l'image et la toussaint puisse être faite, j'aurais besoin de la confirmation qu'il s'agit bien d'un édifice dédié au culte catholique. Par ailleurs, "chapelle de Kehlen" suffit-il à la description ou doit-on vraiment spécifier "de la rue d'Olm" (qui peut sembler un peu "too much" pour un descriptif d'image du jour) ?

Cordialement, Ikmo-ned (talk) 18:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup.Ikmo-ned (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

¡Ay, Cayambe!Edit

Bonjour Cayambe, Merci de ton message. Cette fois-ci, c'est une de tes images équatoriennes/équatoriales que j'ai insérée dans fr:WP, dans Géographie de l'Équateur et Équateur (ligne équinoxiale). Ce qui m'a donné le plaisir d'en apprendre plus sur ton pseudo :-) --Myrabella (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Cayambe Equator monument 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cayambe Equator monument 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Kirchberg as from montée Pfaffenthal 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Kirchberg as from montée Pfaffenthal 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Virgen de Quito 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgen de Quito 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Cayambe Equator monument 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cayambe Equator monument 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Virgen de Quito Panecillo Detalle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgen de Quito Panecillo Detalle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Virgen de Quito Panecillo dragon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgen de Quito Panecillo dragon.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP PromotionEdit

Virgen de Quito Panecillo 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Virgen de Quito Panecillo 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Virgen de Quito Panecillo 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito as from panecillo Basilica.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito as from panecillo Basilica.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schwarzwald Hinterzarten 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzwald Hinterzarten 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hinterwald Cattle Hinterzarten.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinterwald Cattle Hinterzarten.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Templo de la Patria from Panecillo 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Templo de la Patria from Panecillo 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito from El Panecillo 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito from El Panecillo 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

porte de la banqueEdit

Aujourd'hui c'est toi qui n'a pas signé, ce qui n’empêche d'ailleurs pas ton image d'être promue... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg BCEE pl Metz av Liberté.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg BCEE pl Metz av Liberté.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City BCEE porte av Liberté 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City BCEE porte av Liberté 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Luxembourg BCEE bv Pétrusse porte 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg BCEE bv Pétrusse porte 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Mondorf-les-Bains pavillon Kind a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mondorf-les-Bains pavillon Kind a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QIEdit

Guten Tag, Claude!
Deine Nomination hat die Fehler. Die weißen Flecke auf dem Himmel und auf dem Dach. Ist es das Bild aus zwei Schichten gemacht? Siehe und entferne die Anmerkungen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Acordion player.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quito El Panecillo monument entrance.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito El Panecillo monument entrance.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Plaza Independencia Pal Carondelet 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Plaza Independencia Pal Carondelet 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito calle Venezuela Panecillo 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito calle Venezuela Panecillo 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FotothéikLëtzebuerg01Edit

Hi Cayambe, would you be able to upload your image lb:Fichier:FotothéikLëtzebuerg01.jpg to commons, so that it can be used in en:Photothèque (Luxembourg) ? --Elekhh (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks, is great to have so helpful and reliable editors like you. Hope to get it onto the main page soon. --Elekhh (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
And there it is on the main page for the next six hours. Thanks again. --Elekhh (talk) 01:45, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Hi Cayambe,
have you seen my comment to your deletion request File:Quito Acordion player.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito calle Venezuela Basilica.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito calle Venezuela Basilica.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Plaza Independencia.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Plaza Independencia.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MerciEdit

Salut Cayambe.
Je m'aperçois que je bénéficie fréquemment de ton soutien, et de tes votes favorables.
Je t'en remercie. Je suis heureux que mes images te plaisent.
A part les amis Archéo, Rama et Llez avec leurs magnifiques images de studio (mais c'est très spécial), je suis à peu près le seul à proposer des images d'objets ou d'oeuvres d'art prises en intérieur, mais personne ne semble le remarquer, et je me sens donc un peu seul parfois. Avec l'éclairage artificiel, dans un musée, à main-levée (interdiction de supports), c'est difficile de faire des bonnes photos, je te remercie donc de ton soutien fréquent, qui m'est précieux.
J'aime beaucoup aussi, en ce qui me concerne, tes photos équatoriennes, ça m'ouvre l'esprit sur un secteur du Globe que je ne connais pas. merci de me le faire découvrir, comme de me permettre de mieux connaître ton pays de Luxembourg.
Bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 16:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Ville photothèque 2008.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Ville photothèque 2008.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Accordion player.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Accordion player.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito San Francisco Interview RTU 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito San Francisco Interview RTU 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP PromotionEdit

Quito Accordion player.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Quito Accordion player.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quito Accordion player.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Palacio Arzobispal patio 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Palacio Arzobispal patio 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 d.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 d.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quito Calle García Moreno.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Calle García Moreno.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

La RampanteEdit

Bonjour Cayambe
J'ai peur que tu ne soies embêté par des "chercheurs de petite bête" avec la licence et la permission.
Tu es détenteur du droit d'auteur de la photo, mais pas de l'oeuvre photographiée. J'ai peur que la licence choisie ne soit pas la bonne.
Tu écris que tu as l'autorisation des ayant-droits... Je crains qu'un administrateur zélé ne t'en demande la preuve.
Mais je ne connais rien au droit luxembourgeois en ce domaine. En France, publier cette photo en l'état ne serait pas possible...
J'espère et je souhaite bien sûr que mes craintes soient vaines...
C'est une bonne photo, et l'oeuvre mérite d'être connue, en tous cas.--Jebulon (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

L Wercollier La rampante.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L Wercollier La rampante.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito calle García Moreno.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito calle García Moreno.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

* * * :) * * *Edit

Ich wünsche Dir fröhliche Weihnachtsfeiertage und alles Gute und ganz best im Neuen Jahr!
--George Chernilevsky talk 12:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Iguana iguana Portoviejo 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 e.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 e.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.