User talk:Cayambe/Archive2

Return to "Cayambe/Archive2" page.

ARCHIVE 2 = ARCHIVE 2011

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Iguana iguana Portoviejo 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Pl d'Armes Pëtzdeckel-protected well.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Pl d'Armes Pëtzdeckel-protected well.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ecuador Quito El Ejido Humboldt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecuador Quito El Ejido Humboldt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Water hyacinth Ec Portoviejo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water hyacinth Ec Portoviejo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ecuador Manta Murciélago beach 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecuador Manta Murciélago beach 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quito historical centre colonial house.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quito historical centre colonial house.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP PromotionEdit

Quito calle García Moreno.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ecuador Manta beach restaurants.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecuador Manta beach restaurants.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Pfaffenthal rue L Menager 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Pfaffenthal rue L Menager 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ecuador El Carmen street.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecuador El Carmen street.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Musée national d'histoire et d'art grille en fer forgé.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Musée national d'histoire et d'art grille en fer forgé.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Pfaffenthal St Matthew on church façade.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Pfaffenthal St Matthew on church façade.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City courtyard Musée d'histoire de la ville.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City courtyard Musée d'histoire de la ville.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg City Knuedler excavation 03a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Knuedler excavation 03a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg picturesEdit

Hello Cayambe. I would just like to thank you for all the excellent photographs you have taken in Luxembourg. I keep discovering them as I try to expand the EN WP's coverage of the Grand Duchy and have included many of them in recent articles. Keep up the good work. - Ipigott (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Dear Cayambe,

I have seen your picture from the Schloss Karlsruhe ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karlsruhe_Castle_July_09_c66.jpg )ann we want to use this image for our souveniers.

Please let me know how you want to place your name on the pictures. Please let me have your answer by mail: s.breithaupt@berlin-design.com

Thank you

Brgds

Berlin Design

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Petrusse fortress and remarkable beech 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Petrusse fortress and remarkable beech 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Elaeis guineensis oil palm fruit Portoviejo Ecuador.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elaeis guineensis oil palm fruit Portoviejo Ecuador.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Karlsruhe Castle July 09 c66.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlsruhe Castle July 09 c66.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Bestioles équatoriennes en FPCEdit

Que dire, sinon t'adresser mes compliments ?
Tes deux iguanes sont magnifiques et méritent tout à fait l'enthousiasme qu'ils semblent d'emblée susciter.
Tu fais très fort ce coup-là, bravo !
Ce n'est pas vendre la peau de l'ours l'iguane avant de l'avoir tué que de te féliciter, d'ores et déjà.
Cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Manta Ec playa Murciélago.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manta Ec playa Murciélago.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Ville photothèque 3-2011a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Ville photothèque 3-2011a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb Useldange Maison Faber 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Useldange Maison Faber 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Manta Ecuador playa Murciélago 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manta Ecuador playa Murciélago 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP PromotionEdit

Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Manta Ecuador playa Murciélago 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manta Ecuador playa Murciélago 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Fort thüngen Dräi Eechelen 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort thüngen Dräi Eechelen 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Cleanup after transfer to CommonsEdit

Hi! I do not agree that information like the one you removed here [1] is not needed. If name of the uploader is not the same as the author we need a good reason to why this is ok. When it is removed it is harder to "follow" the file and verify that it is ok. If you remove the information the risk that someone nominates the file for deletion (and the file gets deleted) is higher. --MGA73 (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Synagogue 01a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Synagogue 01a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quercus robur en QICEdit

Bonjour Cayambe.
J'aime bien ton chêne remarquable.
Je trouve qu'il manque un peu d'air au dessus (tight crop), mais qu'en revanche il y a trop de "décor" inutile à droite et à gauche, ce qui en rend la composition perfectible à mon avis.
Peut-être qu'une vue verticale aurait été meilleure...
Qu'en penses-tu ? Si tu es d'accord avec mon constat, crois-tu pouvoir faire quelque chose ?
Amitiés--Jebulon (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Re-moi.
En vertu de l'adage "not words, facts", je t'ai répondu sous l'image, par un soutien. C'est beaucoup mieux désormais, et je suis sensible à ton argument de l'objet dans son contexte.
Au fait, merci de ton soutien pour mon mandrill. Tu auras noté que ce n'est pas moi qui l'ai proposé : je ne le trouve pas terrible, ils est un peu flou et brouillé, avec du "bruit" aussi (photo derrière une vitrine, musée sombre...). A l'époque, c'était le seul du genre, mais maintenant ceux de notre ami Archaeodontodaurus sont bien meilleurs !!
Bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 09:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Cat close-up 2004 b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cat close-up 2004 b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

louis XIVEdit

Merci, mon ami, pour cette promotion de la statue de louis 14. Mais je dois à la vérité d'avouer qu'il n'y a pas de découpage; ce n'est que le ciel de Versailles qui était ainsi ce jour-là. Ce fait ne rend la photo ni meilleure ni pire, mais c'est ainsi. J'ai au moins su conserver netteté, détails, couleur du bronze et contraste. Amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kleinbettingen Quercus robur 2011 a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinbettingen Quercus robur 2011 a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Bonnevoie plaque Unio'n.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Bonnevoie plaque Unio'n.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Vianden René Engelmann monument a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vianden René Engelmann monument a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Euston stationEdit

Hi, I just wanted to check you promoted the image you meant to with this edit - your summary says promote Euston, but the image you promoted was of Birmingham New Street. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Cercle municipal top.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Cercle municipal top.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

remarqueEdit

Il y a, dans beaucoup de tes photographies, un côté intimiste et une paix intérieure, qui font du bien à ces qui les regarde. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Manternach Fuussebau door.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manternach Fuussebau door.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Wilwerwiltz St Willibrord Chapel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilwerwiltz St Willibrord Chapel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb Lellingen Narcissus population.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Lellingen Narcissus population.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Place Clairefontaine Luxembourg 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Clairefontaine Luxembourg 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg pl Guillaume II rue du Fossé.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg pl Guillaume II rue du Fossé.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wilwerwiltz Gare 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilwerwiltz Gare 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Colmar-Berg House 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colmar-Berg House 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Mersch Maison Servais front.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mersch Maison Servais front.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Temple d'AthenaEdit

Bonsoir Cayambe. Merci de ton message. je vois bien la tache au dessus du bonhomme, mais pas celles de droite. Peux-tu me les marquer s'il te plaît ? Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Voilà, je crois que c'est bon maintenant. Merci de ta vigilance !--Jebulon (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Mersch Maison Servais from park 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mersch Maison Servais from park 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Nicolas Welter Monument Mersch 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicolas Welter Monument Mersch 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City monument Guillaume II statue 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City monument Guillaume II statue 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb City Limpertsberg crossroads.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb City Limpertsberg crossroads.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg City église Saint-Alphonse ext a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City église Saint-Alphonse ext a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg City Square Guillaume II towards Notre-Dame Cathedral April 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Square Guillaume II towards Notre-Dame Cathedral April 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ecuador Manta Murciélago fishermen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecuador Manta Murciélago fishermen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City St-Alphonse portal sup.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City St-Alphonse portal sup.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb Mersch Gare.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Mersch Gare.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Grand Ducal Palace coat of arms Lion.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Grand Ducal Palace coat of arms Lion.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Oiseaux et taches helléniquesEdit

Salut Ô mon Luxembourgo-équatorien préféré
Les petits points noirs sont bien des oiseaux (si, si)
Mais les taches sont bien des taches (je les ai vues).
Je corrige ça dès que possible.
Merci de ta vigilance et de tes compliments, --Jebulon (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done--Jebulon (talk) 17:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg pl Guillaume II vers rue de la Reine.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg pl Guillaume II vers rue de la Reine.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Luxemb Hagelsdorf Church.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Quality Image PromotionEdit

J A Zinnen Plaque Knuedler Luxemb City.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! J A Zinnen Plaque Knuedler Luxemb City.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb Hagelsdorf Church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Hagelsdorf Church.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb City square Guillaume II passage H de ville.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb City square Guillaume II passage H de ville.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Croix de Hinzert Memorial 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Croix de Hinzert Memorial 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxemb Bridel oak rue Nic Goedert 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb Bridel oak rue Nic Goedert 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Promotion "Sea of Galilee"Edit

Hallo, irgend etwas war da falsch. Da ist ein Datum eingetragen, das in der Zukunft liegt ???? Dort steht: --Cayambe 07:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC) --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Das war ja kein großes Problem. Ich dachte die Zeit wird von den Wikimedia Servern genommen aber das ist vielleicht auf der QIC Seite anders. --Berthold Werner (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Neuhaeusgen Chapel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhaeusgen Chapel 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Crucita Ecuador beach 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crucita Ecuador beach 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Aarnescht L Reichling monument.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aarnescht L Reichling monument.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Aline Mayrisch monument.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Aline Mayrisch monument.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Glacis Chapel 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Glacis Chapel 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Esch-sur-Sure plague monument.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure plague monument.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Heliconius-charithonia-paarung.jpgEdit

Hallo Cayambe, entschuldige bitte meine verspätete Antwort zu Deinem Kommentar aber ich war im Urlaub :o). Ich habe mir das Bild gerade nochmal bewußt angeschaut und Du hast vollkommen recht; es fehlt tatsächlich ein Stück Hintergrund! Vielen Dank für den Tip und viele Grüße H. Krisp (talk) 20:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Potamocypris humilis carapace.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potamocypris humilis carapace.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Lintgen Heuardt house.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Lintgen Heuardt house.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Wercollier_Interpenetration_Strasbourg_01.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wercollier_Interpenetration_Strasbourg_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 18:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Lintgen Chapel rue de Diekirch.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Lintgen Chapel rue de Diekirch.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Lintgen Heuardt house door.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Lintgen Heuardt house door.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

BravoEdit

Pour l'image du jour! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

QIEdit

attention tu n'as pas signé ta dernière image en QI... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Clausen Michel Rodange house of death.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Clausen Michel Rodange house of death.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

IguaneEdit

Bonjour Cayambe,

Je revois avec plaisir, en image du jour, ton iguane équatorien.
Félicitations renouvelées pour cette belle photo justement primée!
Amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 08:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Clausen Michel Rodange Plaque a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Clausen Michel Rodange Plaque a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

ThankEdit

Hi, thanks for recognizing my work like a high quality.

Stomach mucosal layer labeled.svg

This image is also put to the vote as Featured picture candidates, if you have time take a look of this voting. Thank You - MKomorniczak -talk- 14:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Kehlen 1 rue Schoenberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Kehlen 1 rue Schoenberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg City rue de Beggen 170.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue de Beggen 170.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Mersch Maison Servais front wide.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mersch Maison Servais front wide.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City Val Fleuri windmill ruins.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Val Fleuri windmill ruins.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ginkgo biloba in LuxemburgEdit

copyright violation?
your image

Hallo Cayambe, das muß ein RIESEN-Zufall oder eine Copyright Verletzung sein!? Beide Bilder zeigen die gleichen Wolkenstrukturen. Das Bild mußte also von "Euch" beiden zum gleichen Zeitpunk geknipst worden sein. Oder bist Du es beides? Ich frage nur weil es gerade ein Thema auf der deutschen KEB-Seite ist. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


Hallo Alchemist,

das ist KEIN Zufall, ich war ganz alleine als ich im August 2008 dieses Foto (und andere) von diesem Baum in Luxemburg geknipst habe. Du schreibst genau richtig , dass die Wolkenstruktur die gleiche ist... es handelt sich also ganz sicher um das gleiche Bild. Links hat der 'Autor' Ginkgotree den Balkon weggeklont, was, besonders im Pflanzenkübel, bei 100% deutlich zu erkennen ist. Den Balkon hatte ich damals mit ins Bild genommen, damit man sieht, von wo aus das Foto geknipst wurde (heute würde ich das nicht mehr tun). Es handelt sich also klar um eine Copyright-Verletzung, das der Autor des Bildes nicht genannt wird. Fast noch schlimmer ist, dass die Schärfe im Copyvio-Bild verstümmelt wurde. Danke noch einmal für den Hinweis und herzliche Grüße aus Luxemburg, --Cayambe (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

noch eine copyvio?
Ich habe noch ein Bild. Ist es auch von Dir? Grüße aus Norddeutschland, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Nein, dieses Bild ist nicht von mir. Es 'riecht' aber irgendwie gleichfalls nach einer Copyvio. :-) --Cayambe (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kleinbettingen château d'eau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinbettingen château d'eau.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Hamm church plaques.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Hamm church plaques.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Bofferdange Fagus sylvatica purpurea .jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Bofferdange Fagus sylvatica purpurea .jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Hobscheid church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Hobscheid church.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

QICEdit

Bonsoir Claude,

Félicitation pour tes jolies photographies et merci pour ton soutien à un presque "cousin" (né dans la Province de Luxembourg).

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City rue du Curé Mamergaass street sign.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue du Curé Mamergaass street sign.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg pl Guillaume II vers rue de la Reine wide.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg pl Guillaume II vers rue de la Reine wide.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg Hamm Schleifmühle villa.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Hamm Schleifmühle villa.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City rue du Curé 10 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue du Curé 10 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Sula sula Galápagos isla Genovesa preening 2004.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sula sula Galápagos isla Genovesa preening 2004.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg Tétange Centre culturel Schungfabrik.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Tétange Centre culturel Schungfabrik.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Luxembourg City Hôtel de Bourgogne front sept 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City Hôtel de Bourgogne front sept 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Catalpa promuEdit

Bonjour Cayambe,

Je te remercie d'avoir promu mes feuilles et fruits de Catalpa bignonioides, mais comme tu y as mis une réserve, je ne veux pas que tu croies que je ne m'intéresse qu'au label et qu'une fois celui-ci obtenu, je ne tiens pas compte des commentaires de mes pairs !
Tu dois bien te douter, en ayant vu l'image, que j'ai volontairement inclus dans celle-ci la partie du tronc que tu souhaitais voir disparaitre.
Il s'agit bien du tronc du catalpa dont j'ai montré fleurs et fruits, et j'ai pensé que l'inclure pour partie ajoutait à l'intérêt documentaire de l'image.
De plus, je trouve que ça agrémente la composition. Mon cadrage aurait été probablement différent sans le tronc.
Voilà. À défaut peut-être de te convaincre, j'espère que cette explication t'aura éclairé sur mon choix.
Merci en tous cas de ta bienveillance. Reçois toutes mes amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 22:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Cayambe,

Merci de ton message. Pour le catalpa, c'est finalement, comme tu dis, une question d'appréciation personnelle.
Pour la déformation sur ton image, je comprends ce que tu veux dire, et c'est vrai que la distortion (y compris du bac au premier plan à gauche) est inévitable compte tenu des circonstances. Mais elle heurte un peu, ou l'oeil ou plutôt le cerveau.
Moi, mon problème, c'est la profondeur de champ. Je n'ai pas encore bien intégré le concept, et je suis donc confronté à des manques de netteté, par exemple, que je ne sais pas gérer. Cadrage, exposition, composition, je maîtrise à peu près, et j'arrive à avoir l' "oeil". mais la profondeur de champ, c'est différent. C'est de la physique optique, et je ne suis pas un matheux ! ça manque de concret pour moi. Je ne comprends pas le sens des remarques du genre "mais pourquoi F9, le sujet ne s'y prête pas !". Et c'est vrai que ça ressortit souvent pour moi du domaine du pifomètre !
Je vais m'atteler à la question, mais il faut que je trouve une explication vulgarisatrice, ce que j'ai vu jusqu'à présent est trop scientifique pour ma pauvre cervelle. Si tu as un lien vers un site, ce sera volontiers !
Dordogne: c'est vraiment un beau pays, avec beaucoup de choses à voir. J'ai mitraillé énormément, mais comme toujours, il y a beaucoup de déchet et de nombreuses erreurs techniques dont je suis bien conscient....
Mais tu ne me verras jamais (ou très rarement), propulser de moi-même en "consensual review" une de mes photos rejetées, même si parfois j'argumente, comme pour le Catalpa en entier qui me parait effectivement être une Image de Qualité...
J'essaie aussi, dans les QIC, de varier les sujets de mes images, et même peut-être de surprendre le spectateur, en montrant des choses différentes pour ne pas lasser. Je déteste l'alignement, comme à la parade, de dizaines de photos successives de détails d'églises qui se ressemblent toutes, qui sont inutilisables parce que mal catégorisées, mal décrites, et qui ne sont présentées que pour l'accumulation de labels...
Mais du coup je m'autocensure, car si je ne me retenais pas, je ferais des commentaires trop cinglants.
Bien à toi,--Jebulon (talk) 08:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxemb City pl de Clairefontaine St Maximin.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxemb City pl de Clairefontaine St Maximin.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Luxembourg City 3 rue du Curé .jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City 3 rue du Curé .jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


File:Nice Monument aux morts 1ère guerre mondiale 01.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nice Monument aux morts 1ère guerre mondiale 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 23:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Cayambe,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Bullfighting_in_QuitoEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Bullfighting_in_Quito has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Closeapple (talk) 10:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Last modified on 25 September 2013, at 14:14