February 4, 2014 Hello,
I am writing to thank you for making your photograph available for publication through Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. We plan to use the following photograph for inclusion in Harold Kalman, Heritage Planning, to be published in 2014 by Routledge. The image that we plan to use is:
You will be credited as the photographer in the caption as Chensiyuan
If you have any questions please contact me by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:1 zhangjiajie huangshizhai wulingyuan panorama 2012.jpgEdit
Your picture is good, but is likely to fail unless you fix the dust spots that are indicated, and remove the CA (Chromatic aberration -- the green and purple fringe). These are easy to remove in Adobe Camera Raw or Lightroom or Elements. -- Colin (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Haagenchocdec.JPGEdit
|This media may be deleted.|
|A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Haagenchocdec.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.
|File:Haagenchocdec.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.