Last modified on 24 June 2014, at 07:39

User talk:Cherubino

Return to "Cherubino" page.
If you want to get through to me quickly, please go to my talk page at the german Wikipedia.

PD-TagsEdit

Hallo Cherubino! Danke für's fleißige Löschen der COM-Quellbilder in dewikip. ;-)

In (u.a.) File:Kolbenv6.jpg hast du {{PD-release}} zu {{PD-user|M.james|de}} geändert - was ja auch stimmt. Danke Ist das vorhergehende so falsch?

Den Commonhelper zu modifizieren, so dass er gleich das richtige Template nimmt, geht wohl nicht, weil die Bilder in dewikip nur mit {{Bild-frei}} gekennzeichnet sind, oder? Oder doch? Wenn einfach das, was in der dewikip bei "Autor" steht in die Vorlage geschrieben würde? Hmm.. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi ChrisiPK hats mir mal irgendwo erklärt mit den PD-tags, finde ich grade nicht. Vielleicht fragst du ihn. Mit dem CommonsHelper kenne ich mich noch weniger aus. Sorry & Gruß-- Cherubino (talk)

Hehe, okay. :) Danke trotzdem. Ich schaue mir die Sache mit den PD-tags nochmal an und frage dann Magnus (Commonshelper-Autor) selbst. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 14:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Verdienstabzeichen 20 Mach-Mit-Bewegung (DDR).jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:54, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

done Cherubino (talk) 12:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mainzer Psalter.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mainzer Psalter.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mainzer Psalter.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Polarlys (talk) 14:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Cherubino,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Löschungen der Transferinfos CommonshelperEdit

Hallo Cherubino, ich beobachte mit Neugierde dass du dich an den Infos des Commonshelpers zu schaffen machst und dort Änderungen vornimmst. Meine Frage ist nun einfach, ob es denn so sinnig ist die Quellangaben und Hinweise auf die entsprechende Ursprungswikipedia zu löschen (oder auch die speziell geformte Signatur eines Authors). Gibt es da seit neuestem irgendeine neue Leitlinie, die dies nötig macht? Gruß --Grunpfnul (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, bevor ich die nach commons verschobenen Bilder in de lösche, überprüfe ich ob der Transfer fehlerfrei war. Wenn ja, kann die Info entfernt werden. Woher die Bilder kamen kann man im Original upload log lesen, den es genau dafür gibt, und den ich immer ergänze wenn er mal fehlt. Die Unterschrift, als speziell geformte Signatur, sogar mit Link auf die Diskussionsseite, ist eigentlich nur für Diskussionsbeiträge gedacht. Gruß Cherubino (talk) 23:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Es gibt also keine Leit/Richtlinie dazu und/oder der Commonshelper, wie auch das Clean-Up Tool arbeiten fehlerhaft/unsauber? --Grunpfnul (talk) 08:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Kennst du schon Commons:Moving_to_Commons und User:Magog_the_Ogre/cleanup.js ?-- Cherubino (talk) 10:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Cleanup verwende ich selber (s.o.) - ich wundere mich nur (gerade auch da du dich an moving to commons zu halten scheint) dass du (als Beispiel) immer die redundante PD Info in die Permissions setzt. --Grunpfnul (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Mann wills dem Nachnutzer ja so verständlich wie möglich machen, Unnötiges raus, und Wichtiges betont. -- Cherubino (talk) 23:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Aber dennoch redundant und nicht vereinbar mit den Punkten aus dem 'Essay' "moving to commons" - Nicht falsch verstehen, aber wenn man es penibel machen möchte, dann richtig ;-) --Grunpfnul (talk) 00:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Du hast Recht. Danke. -- Cherubino (talk)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Willi Marx 2009.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Willi Marx 2009.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:32, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

"Cleanup"Edit

Hallo!

Es ist sehr schön, dass du dich um Fotos kümmerst, die aus anderen Wiki-Projekten stammen. Bitte entferne aber nicht relevante Informationen wie "Transferred from de.wikipedia; transferred to Commons by XYZ" oder das ursprüngliche Upload-Datum. Viele Danke. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke fürs Lob. Dein Name steht doch in der History und das Upload-Datum im Original upload log. -- Cherubino (talk) 13:30, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Es geht nicht um meinen "Namen". Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
ne? Wo kann ich denn mal genauestens nachlesen, welcher transfer stuff genau wo hin soll? -- Cherubino (talk) 14:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Transferinfos gehören nicht in die Informationsvorlage, sondern nur ins Original upload log und in den Logtext neben dem Thumbnail (daher revertiert). Ein Grund ist auch, dass beim automatischen Auslesen durch andere Websites dann oft ein falscher Autor genannt wird. --Leyo 21:07, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Danke, so hab ich mir das auch ungefähr gedacht. Ist auch viel anwendungsfreundlicher für den Laien der ein Bilder nutzen möchte, mit diesen Infos aber überhaupt nix anfangen kann. -- Cherubino (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Die Informationsvorlage wird von etlichen Websites automatisch ausgelesen und daraus die Urheberangaben generiert. Daher gehört dort nur rein, was für den Nachnutzer (oder Leser) relevant ist, also Dinge wie Urheber, Quelle und Beschreibung. Dass ein Bild zuerst an einem bestimmten Datum in einer Wikipedia hochgeladen und dann vom Benutzer XY nach Commons transferiert wurde, ist in dieser Hinsicht irrelevant und kann zu Falschangaben bei Nachnutzern führen. --Leyo 19:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Verwandte Diskussion: COM:VP#Removal of original uploader information --Leyo 06:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Gegen die Nutzung von Template:Transferred from (Beispiel-Diff) hätte High Contrast wahrscheinlich nichts. --Leyo 22:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

FoP in AndorraEdit

Last year I contacted the Andorran Cultural Heritage institution regarding FoP in the context of Wiki Loves Monuments. I didnt get a clear response and they agreed to include all listed buildings. I can not add anything else to comments made in the Village Pump. AFAIK there is no FoP in Andorra and probably we have to revise it for next edition of WLM. --V.Riullop (talk) 21:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

ok, moltes gràcies :-) -- Cherubino (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Obergasse 56 (Lang-Göns).JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 03:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Liegerad.ogvEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)


File:Symbol 123.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Cherubino,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 23:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Schillerstraße 57 (Lang-Göns).jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


File:Nur die Ruhe kann es machen.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

It's quite some time ago...Edit

... but when you made this edit you messed up the license. - Jmabel ! talk 02:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

sorry -- Cherubino (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Watzenborn-SteinbergEdit

Hallo Cherubino! Der Bahnhaltepunkt liegt noch auf Gießener Stadtgebiet, deshalb sollte die Gießen-Kategorie schon dabei sein. Daher habe ich deinen Edit zurückgesetzt. Ich hoffe, WP:MH klappt :-) Grüße --Stefan 19:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Stein785.JPGEdit

Hallo. Gibt es keine Herkunft für File:Stein785.JPG ??? Danke ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 12:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, leider nicht, höchtens vielleicht eine Mineralienbörse in Gießen. Hab nochmal ein dunkleres Bild drübergeladen. -- Cherubino (talk) 10:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Es ist ein schönes Bild ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 20:49, 11 June 2013‎
Hilft es bei der Bestimmung? -- Cherubino (talk) 08:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Fachleute können die Mineralprobe eingrenzen durch eine chemische Analyse, durch den Fundort und durch die Paragenesen vorhanden in der Mineralstufe. Viele Rosenquarze verlieren ihre Farbe im Licht. Alles erzählt eine Geschichte ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 07:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Plan Waldgirmes 02.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plan Waldgirmes 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 09:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Plan Waldgirmes 01.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plan Waldgirmes 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 09:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Wetzlarer DomEdit

Danke dir für die Feinkategorisierungen meiner Bilder aus dem Wetzlarer Dom! :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Kein Problem. Ich hatte selbst noch Bilder vom Dom zum kategorisieren. -- Cherubino (talk) 19:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Schloß ButzbachEdit

Bevor Du hier irgendwelche Kategorien löschst (was sowieso schon eine Ungehörigkeit ist - man hätte ohne weiteres eine hinzufügen können) solltest Du Dich erst mal genauer über den Sachstand informieren. Nicht alle Gebäude der Schloß-Kaserne haben etwas mit dem eigentlichen Schloß zu tun - weder die Kasernenmauer, noch das Stabsgebäude noch die Mannschaftsblocks noch die Reithalle/Turnhalle oder das von den Amis erbaute Ziertor in der Griedeler Straße. Ich mußte daher die alte Kategorie wiederherstellen und die nicht relvaneten Gebäude aus der von Dir erstellten Kategorie entfernen - als ob man nicht schon genug zu tun hätte. -- Steinbeisser (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Hab dir schon geantwortet bei de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Cherubino#Schloß_Butzbach -- Cherubino (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Sri LankaEdit

Hi! Sri Lanka isn't participating this year. Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 is already running and fixed to the current countries, but you can prepare for the 2014 edition. One basic thing we need for participation in Wiki Loves Monuments is that there are lists of monuments on Wikipedia with the monuments. In most countries the national government has set up a list of monuments. Such list should be created on Wikipedia. See for example: en:List of Monuments of National Importance in Andhra Pradesh for a list in India. If you need help, contact me on this link. Romaine (talk) 01:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

i only have pictures of Category:World Heritage Sites in Sri Lanka -- Cherubino (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Obergasse 12 (Bettenhausen) 03.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Obergasse 12 (Bettenhausen) 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Talarn 02.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Talarn 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 15:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Evangelische Kirche Watzenborn-Steinberg Orgel 07.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Evangelische Kirche Watzenborn-Steinberg Orgel 07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Evangelische Kirche Watzenborn-Steinberg Kruzifix 01.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Evangelische Kirche Watzenborn-Steinberg Kruzifix 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 19:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Chameleon Horton Plains.webmEdit

Hallo Cherubino, das ist definitiv kein Chamaeleon sondern eine Agamide (ich denke aus der Gattung Calotes), die dir da mit Kopfnicken droht. Frag doch bitte mal auf der Bestimmungsseite in Wikipedia nach, vielleicht kann dort jemand noch mehr dazu sagen. Kurze Frage zur Technik: wie kommt die etwas merkwürdige Auflösung von 1.279×720 Pixeln zustande (normal wären 1280x720)? Gruß aus Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, die Auflösung kommt vom Programm Miro Converter, da ich mein mp4-File erst noch Wikipedia-tauglich machen musste. Du kannst gern verschieben, bin grad nur am Smartphone. -Cherubino (talk) 03:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Nur als Tipp: benutze zum Umwalnden nach webm am besten ffmpeg, das liefert die qualitativ besten Ergebnisse. Wenn du die Lust dazu hast (und etwas Zeit aufbringen kannst), ließe sich das Video auch noch etwas entwackeln... Gruß aus Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Danke für den Tipp, ich werde mir das Programm mal anschauen. Leider hab ich keine Ahnung vom Entwackeln ;-) -- Cherubino (talk) 08:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Unter Windows kann man sowas mit Virtualdub/deshaker machen. Schau dir dazu mal File:Video_image_stabilization.ogv an; wenn du es probieren möchtest und Hilfe brauchst, melde dich einfach. Ansonsten habe ich das Video für den 4.12. als Motd für die Hauptseite von commons eingetragen. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Sollte man das Video dann nicht besser mit ffmpeg neu konvertieren, und erneut hochladen? Leider komme ich vor Montag nicht an die mp4-Datei. Motd besser verschieben? -- Cherubino (talk) 13:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Kein Problem, wie wär es eine Woche später? --Pristurus (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hab halt null Ahnung davon, einen langsamen Rechner und am liebsten wäre mir jemand mit Ahnung würde das machen :-( -- Cherubino (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Also, ich habe es auf den 10.11. verschoben. Lernen kann man alles, sofern man es denn will und auch die Zeit dazu hat; alternativ könntest ich dier anbieten, das für dich zu erledigen (du müsstest dann aber dazu bei einem beliebigen Filehoster deine originale mp4 hochladen). Gruß aus Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hallo, klingt super, ich werd versuchen die Datei am Montag auf en:Sendspace.com hochzuladen. Cherubino (talk) 19:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Okay, wenn du soweit bist, lass es mich wissen. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Du hast eine Wikimail mit dem Downloadlink. VG -- Cherubino (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Auch du hast eine Mail.. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 10:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
So, hab dir noch 10 Dateien hochgeladen ;-) Vielleicht ist ja was brauchbares dabei. -- Cherubino (talk) 10:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
+2 -- Cherubino (talk) 11:27, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
So, die Datei habe ich 2x geupdatet, beim ersten mal wollte sie nicht umschlüsseln. Den letzten Teil habe ich als Übersichtsaufnahme nach vorn gestellt, die folgende Szene verlangsamt und den Rest soweit das ging etwas entwackelt. Beim Ton fehlen jetzt die lauten Windgeräusche, den Rest habe ich einfach mehrfach verwendet (um auf die gesamte Videolänge zu kommen). Schau mal, ob damit leben kannst.. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Danke, ist ja sehr schön geworden! Ich hatte noch versucht dir drei Mails zu senden mit Links zu hochgeladenen mp4-Dateien mit Tieren, leider hatte ich in der Mailadresse den letzten Buchstaben vergessen, hab sie gerade nochmal zusammengefasst und gesandt. VG -- Cherubino (talk) 15:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
So, alle Videos vom Elefantenwaisenhaus sind hochgeladen von File:Pinnawala-Elephant-Orphanage-01.webm bis -06.webm Nochmals Danke fürs bearbeiten. -- Cherubino (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Eine weitere Mail an dich ist raus, den Ton habe ich zum Teil weggelassen. Mit der 2. Weißbartlangur-Datei gab es Schwierigkeiten beim Download (Serverarbeiten), danach war sie merkwürdigerweise gesperrt. Die müsste also nochmal hochgeladen werden. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 21:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Cherubino,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image PromotionEdit

San Climent de Coll de Nargó (stitch 1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Climent de Coll de Nargó (stitch 1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in DeutschlandEdit

WLM-2012 Winner in Germany.jpg

Hallo Cherubino,

etwas spät, aber noch nicht zu spät, möchte ich dir hiermit, pünktlich zum Nikolaus, im Namen der Juroren das Goldene Gummibärchen für deine erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments überreichen.

Ich hoffe dir hat der Wettbewerb mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet wie uns. Sehen wir dich 2014 wieder?


Ein besinnliches Adventswochenende und viel Erfolg im nächsten Jahr wünscht dir,
Anika (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank und eine frohe Weihnachtszeit! -- Cherubino (talk) 18:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Wende Dich für den Preis bitte an community@wikimedia.de. Grüße --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

SurveyEdit


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Cherubino,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

New URL for OgreBot's old version filemoverEdit

Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

ok. -- Cherubino (talk) 08:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Circumcision Sakkara 1.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Circumcision Sakkara 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 16:15, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Horton Plains National ParkEdit

Hi Cherubino, great photos of Horton Plains National Park and Pattipola railway station! Hope, my description is okay? If You are able to describe a little bit more plants and locations in Horton Plains, it would be easier to categorise and use photos in articles. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, so genau weiß auch nicht was da immer drauf ist, aber ich werds mal versuchen. -- Cherubino (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Fluidum.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fluidum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Rheinfelser Straße 65 (Hüttenberg)Edit

Hallo Cherubino, willst Du die Rheinfelser Straße denn nicht in Volpertshausen verorten? Grüße -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, verbessert -->Category:Rheinfelser Straße 65 (Volpertshausen). Danke fürs Aufpassen. -- Cherubino (talk) 16:19, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Leitungsschutzschalter-ein-aus-ArM.gifEdit

Hallo Cherubino, könntest du die Abbildung dieses Leistungsschutzschalters mal bitte horizontal spiegeln, also „auf Kopf“ stellen? So, wie er abgebildet ist, würde er nicht zuverlässig funktioneren. Die de:Deionkammer muss sich über dem Schalter befinden. Danke! Gruß --Apde (talk) 08:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, hab den Rotatebot beauftragt. {rotate|180} VG -- Cherubino (talk) 21:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Nord-SüdEdit

Wenn File:Holzheim Ev. Kirche Südseite (2).jpg lt. Beschreibung die Nordseite zeigt, dann sollte man die Datei aber mal entsprechend verschieben, oder? --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Stimmt. Die Kirche ist geostet, der Altar also im Osten, der Turm ist bei dieser Kirche im Westen, das Bild also von Nordosten fotografiert. File:Holzheim Ev. Kirche Nordportal.jpg ist eigentlich auch das Westportal, Haupteingang am Turm. Cherubino (talk) 06:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC) PS Habs verschoben

File:Graffiti Bahnhof Großen-Linden 12.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Graffiti Bahnhof Großen-Linden 12.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

wg. "good pictures"Edit

Hallo Cherubino,

ich meinte FastCCI: siehe Help:FastCCI/de

Category:Ethnographic museums --> oben rechts neben "Category:..." gibt es den Knopf "Gute Bilder" oder eben "good pictures" und darüber sollten alle ausgezeichneten Bilder genannt werden. Dort könnte auch noch zwischen "Exzellenten Bildern", "Qualitätsbildern" und "wertvollen Bildern" ausgewählt werden. Weitere Spielereien sind auch möglich.

Lieben Gruß, Anika (talk) 07:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Ah, ok, danke schön, VG. -- Cherubino (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)