User talk:Codename Lisa

Return to "Codename Lisa" page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Codename Lisa!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

File:Functions in Excel.PNGEdit

It is my understanding that this file has been retained per the deletion discussion on its Talk page. If I am mistaken, please advise further. Brews ohare (talk) 14:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Brews.
I have been aware of this edit seconds after it was done and the fact there is my "touch" in it. So, there is little to worry about here.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 04:56, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Word Web AppEdit

It's Okay, my picture was pretty crappy, anyhow. It has been replaced, and that is all that matters

Windows 1.0 logo is FAKEEdit

Specifying a link to blogs.windows.com/windows/b/bloggingwindows/archive/2012/02/17/redesigning-the-windows-logo.aspx as a source just makes me LOL - looks like Sam Moreau or someone else at Microsoft decided to fix the initial logo missing problem by creating a fake logo which they now represent as an original Windows Logo! Really, history is a subject to change... -- Aaleksanyants (talk)

Could you remove your keep on that file please rather than try keeping a fake logo. If you realllyreally feel it should be kept then at least move it to a name that isn't misleading like Reimagined Windows logo. I think there may also be problems with using the Windows trademark on something not approved by Microsoft. Dmcq (talk) 12:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

I have raised Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Problematic_closure_of_deletion_request_after_one_day about the closure as I believe it was wrong to close after one day. Dmcq (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Free version of RibbonEdit

Could you generate another free version of the Ribbon image with several tabs? The one you uploaded isn't different enough to a regular toolbar to illustrate what's new and work as a replacement. Thanks for the nice work! Diego Moya (talk) 08:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, why not? But there is a space of a day or two between me and any computer that can possibly do that. (Noticed the space of time between your message and my reply?) Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 05:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Windows 8 pre-login.pngEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Windows 8 pre-login.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

188.104.122.1 20:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:OpenWire Editor installed in Delphi XE3.jpgEdit

Hi Lisa,

Why was this file marked as Copyright violation? It is original work by me, and I have asked and obtained permissions to capture the screen (just to be on the safe side ;-) ).

With Best regards,
Boian

Edit

Hey, CL. Have you noticed that recently, you've been constantly removing Category:YouTube logos from File:Body painting - Videoplayer.jpg? I know that you are not actively engaged in editing Commons and you might have forgotten your previous reverts but it is high time you started talking to User:Tm. Fleet Command (talk) 00:25, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Wilco; thanks. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 01:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Sdsd.pngEdit

I took a look at this file (I was looking into your contrib log) and saw your edits. If anybody else had done it, I'd say he or she was a vandal with a weird sense of humor. What made you think it is an "f"-shaped Adobe Flash logo? (Your last edit shows you no longer think it is the case.) Fleet Command (talk) 03:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi.
Actually, I am badly confused. When I looked at it, it did look like a small fancy white "f", like Flash Player (not Flash) logo, on a transparent background. This has never happened before. Overnight, it turned into a YouTube logo and I don't have a recollection of having erased my browser cache either.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 09:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Microsoft_web_logosEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Microsoft_web_logos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Rezonansowy (talk) 23:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Issue of deletion for copyright violation: SyberiaEdit

I am quite surprised to see that the 10 screenshots of the game Syberia are considered as a possible copyright violation. The OTRS permission to use these files with the CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence directly comes from the CEO of the publishing company Anuman Interactive. Of course the whole game (Syberia) is still copyrighted, but the 10 screenshots on Wikimedia are now under a free licence thanks to the permission. Please check the OTRS ticket to see that everything is regular. --ΛΦΠ (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. You should probably talk about that with the involved admin; I have no permission for verifying OTRS or deleting the images. But I find your assertion about the CEO of Anuman giving out the images under CC-BY-SA 3.0 extremely odd. They earn a living out of the commercial status of these images.
I have previously encountered a lot of such images and I have always nominated them for deletion. So far, it has always been that some promoter gave the images or screenshots and said with a smile, "oh, do feel free to use them freely" but never explicitly mentioned CC-BY-SA 3.0. That's why they have always been deleted. But, the outcome of this deletion request pretty much depends on the strength of whatever evidence that is sent to OTRS.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
The permission given by Anuman's CEO and registered with the OTRS ticket was the following:
"29.03.2012 16:57 - Stéphane Longeard <''email adress that I can't copy here''@anuman.fr> a écrit:
> Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et 
> exclusif des oeuvres publiées aux adresses suivantes :
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_01_-_Ventousier.png
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_02_-_Oiseau_blanc.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_03_-_Valembois.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_04_-_Mackowski.png
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_05_-_19_oct_1932.png
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_06_-_Y%C3%A9koumani.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_07_-_Le_Phare.png
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_08_-_L%27%C3%AEle_des_%C3%A9chou%C3%A9s.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_09_-_Le_fleuve.png
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_10_-_Village_indien.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_11_-_Le_Volcan.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_12_-_Gameplay.gif
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_13_-_Inventaire.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_14_-_Hydraflot.png
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_15_-_Ordinateur_Hydraflot.png
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_16_-_iPad.jpg
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amerzone_17_-_iPhone.jpg
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_01_-_Kate_Walker.jpg
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_02_-_Oscar.jpg
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_03_-_Coucou_d%27Amerzone.jpg
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_04_-_Valadil%C3%A8ne.jpg
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_05_-_Barrockstadt.jpg
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_06_-_Komkolzgrad.jpg
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_07_-_Aralbad.jpg
> -        http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syberia_08_-_Automates.jpg
> Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette oeuvre sous la licence CC-BY-SA 3.0."
The last sentence written by Anuman's CEO Stéphane Longeard explicitly asserts that the licence of these images is CC-BY-SA 3.0, and he is of course aware of what it means. Everything is regular. It was really tough to obtain this agreement but this was my job to obtain free images for the article L'Amerzone on the French wikipedia. --ΛΦΠ (talk) 21:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi.
If that is indeed true, you needn't have panicked and come to my talk page or anything: An admin would have checked the OTRS and removed the copyvio tag. Have a nice day.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Files with OTRS permissionEdit

Hi Codename Lisa, the following files you put on my discussion page and request a deletion for were transferes from de.wp and have a OTRS permission tag. What is the real reason for deletion? I cannot check the files, beacuse the are deleted. Maybe the commons transfer fails and lost the OTRS template?

--Wdwd (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi.
You can talk to the deleting admin, User:Fastily. His deletion summary reads: "If you are the copyright holder/author and/or have authorization to upload the file, email COM:OTRS." This suggests that either he didn't find any actual OTRS ticket associated with them, or he did, checked them, discovered that they are invalid and deleted the file anyway. (Fastily is a very smart admin.)
I find it very hard to believe that a company has authorized the screenshots of his proprietary product to be published under a free license. I have no power to verify their OTRS tickets or delete them. It is what an admin does. I can only tag the suspects. But more than once my suspicions were justified: The uploader had simply sent an email by himself. (Whether it was a good faith blunder or an act of forgery, I do not judge.)
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Windows 8 Start UI.svgEdit

Hi, I don't understand your revert, what third time? --Rezonansowy (talk) 19:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. There was two problems with your edit:
  1. File:Windows 8 Start UI.svg was already mentioned in {{information}} table twice. Three times would have been overkill.
  2. Other version field is, why, for other versions. File:Windows 8 Start screen UI.png is not another version of File:Windows 8 Start UI.svg. It is the same image. Users can still find both via category, but linking to it is overkill.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 02:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with you, other versions field is for other versions of this same file, I don't see here any overkill. But I'm not a guru in this subject, you can ask COM:Help desk if you would. --Rezonansowy (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Any person with a little bit of logic knows that four, three and even two links to the same thing very close together is abysmal, especially when what is linked is in the same category too. Plus, PNG editions of SVG files in Wikipedia are only not deleted only because they are necessary licensing evils; that means they are tolerated, not loved. So, keep them out of sight, the opposite of what you are doing.
For a person that is not a guru and is sorry, that's too much edit warring; and as for asking help desk, again an non-guru like you must do it. But even they tell you to stop reverting and seek dispute resolution. Fleet Command (talk) 08:43, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Windows Updated Family TreeEdit

Hello there,
Thank you so much for your efforts on Windows Updated Family Tree. :)
I just have a request, would you please update that image with Windows 8.1 & Windows Server 2012 R2?
These should be added: RT (NT 6.3) / 8.1 (NT 6.3) / Server 2012 R2 (NT 6.3)
All of named updates released exactly on 18 October 2013.
I just need the complete and very updated of this image for my project in university, thanks. :)
Edit: If you need to find me, you can catch me at English Wikipedia, although regularly check this page, anyway, feel free to contact me. :)

Nima1024 (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi.
Sorry, I can't. You should ask the original uploader.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 12:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BingHomepage2013.pngEdit

The file I uploaded yesterday (File:BingHomepage2013.png) was simply a copy of the English Wikipedia's File:BingHomepage2013.png, because I wanted to use that image in the Bing page of the Italian Wikipedia. --MarcoV99 (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. We do not accept copies of Wikipedia images if they are non-free. Wikipedia (English or Italian) is another web site. We have our own rules here. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 12:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Windows 8 Taskbar.PNGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Windows 8 Taskbar.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:White sunflowers.jpgEdit

It is done per rename policy, #2. Pleasure to be of help. If the punk continued to edit war, notify an admin. Fleet Command (talk) 04:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I am really uncomfortable with calling an image-reviewer with over 224156 edits a "punk"; altogether, I am uncomfortable with ad hominem arguments of any sort. If anything, you should call me a punk too for doing a blanket revert of Unidentified plants category as well (although, in my defense, it was by accident) or at least disregard his counter-revert. My objective of contacting you in person was speedy and amicable resolution of the situation, so that his concern ("And yet it is so similar [...]") is mitigated. I thank you for the speedy part, yet I fear you have sacrificed its benefit by failing to be amiable enough.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk)
Fine. I will tone it down from now on. But I feel you have gone long enough with your broad definition of good faith; it is high time you hear a counter-argument. I think User:Tm or any other user with over 224156 edits is expected to behave himself; not respond a blanket revert with another blanket revert; to realize that an argument like "And yet it is so similar to an desktop of Windows 8 that it was nominated in a DR" only explains the mistake and does not condone it.
You can ask me to tone it down and try to explain all this amicably, but I think you are going to have a very hard time doing so by constructing an illusion of grandeur from a user's number of edits when I can also see his battlefield mentality and number of blocks. Fleet Command (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Last modified on 17 March 2014, at 21:17