Last modified on 18 October 2009, at 11:56

User talk:Cudo29

Return to "Cudo29" page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cudo29!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:CPT enzyme binding.jpg is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:CPT enzyme binding.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker  20:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


Thank you for your notification. I think this figure may be deleted, because better figure File:Camptothecin binding.svg is already uploaded by User:Yikrazuul. Then I'll leave the dispute tag. Cudo29 (talk) 14:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Irinotecan, position 10.gif is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Irinotecan, position 10.gif you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEURO  20:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I added the lacked hydrogen atom to the carbonyl group.Cudo29 (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


Thanks for the quick correction! One more thing: If you plan to create structural formulae in the future, do you have the possibility to create them as PNG or SVG? GIF and especially JPG are not well-suited file formats for diagrams and structural formulae. I'll be glad to help you, if you have further questions. Cheers, --NEURO  22:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, NEURO. Thank you for your advice. I'll create them as PNG future. By the way, I can provide this figure with PNG format, but it seems not to available to update figures with another picture format. If doing it, should I create another new figure with PNG format? Cudo29 (talk) 13:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Yes, just upload it as a new file and tag the old one with {{duplicate}} and an admin will take care of it. By the way if you plan to create more images of chemical structures or if you are interested in chemistry in general, you might want to take a look at the WikiProject Chemistry here at Commons. I don't know whether there is such a WikiProject in the japanese wikipedia, but one of the goals of this international Project here is to improve quality of chemical drawings. You also might want to take a look at w:Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing. That guideline has been made in order to ensure uniformity among structural formulae. Perhaps you find some helpful tips there. Cheers, --NEURO  20:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice. I'll check them.Cudo29 (talk) 11:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)