User talk:Dllu/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon University Thomas Saf-T-Liner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gates-Hillman Complex at Carnegie Mellon University 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Impressive! --Michael Barera 03:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gates-Hillman Complex at Carnegie Mellon University 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gates-Hillman Complex at Carnegie Mellon University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tight top crop, where there is also a striching error and CAs. --C messier 12:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Fixed Manually blended in some parts. and corrected purple fringes. Dllu 04:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC) @C messier: , would you mind reviewing again and see if the picture is QI now? Thanks. Dllu 10:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. Sorry, for the delay. --C messier 05:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony 28mm f2 SEL28F20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm f1,8 ZA SEL55F18Z.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Denis Barthel 22:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtlaender Heliar Classic VM 75mm f1,8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtlaender Nokton VM 50mm f1,5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm f1,8 lens and Cosina Voigtlaender 50mm f1,5 Nokton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon University Tartan Express.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon University Hunt Library rainbow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon University Hunt Library front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spam and egg musubi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory Sunken Garden fall 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory Gallery Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Hall of Botany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory East Room with Japanese Garden exhibit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 05:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC) I think the sharpness in the middle is fine. The plants on top can't be sharp because they are only around half a meter from the camera. Dllu 15:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice image. It needs perspective correction and please have a look to the (minor) CAs. --XRay 05:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Done I have tried to improve perspective correction and CAs. Dllu 15:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Support OK. IMO it's QI now.--XRay 17:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO overexposed in the middle. And there are CAs and the image needs perspective correction.--XRay 05:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Done I have tried to improve perspective correction. When I checked the histogram there was very little overexposure, but the cloud in the middle is a uniform light grey which looks like overexposure. Dllu 15:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO it's OK. May be there is another opinion. --XRay 17:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Youngstown State University clock tower as seen from Moser Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be contrast could be better. --XRay 07:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh skyline panorama at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Well, I'd prefer a rectilinear projection but I think that's not a reason to oppose. The sky is a little bit noisy but the overall quality is excellent. QI for me. --Code 09:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. I think a rectilinear projection is not possible due to nearly 180 degree horizontal field of view. Things near the edges would appear extremely stretched. This was shot at ISO 100 with a good camera. Any ideas how to reduce noise further? Dllu 20:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh Gateway Station entrance interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 19:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh skyline panorama daytime.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, but I dont think is a taken at night!--ArildV 10:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 Broderie Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments intresting, for me QI. --Rolf H. 13:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 welcome center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 Broderie Room.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 Broderie Room.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 Serpentine Room 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, difficult scene. --C messier 12:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Downtown Pittsburgh from Duquesne Incline in the morning.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Downtown Pittsburgh from Duquesne Incline in the morning.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillman Library, exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Maathavan 03:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auditorium in the Frick Fine Arts Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fireworks at the Pittsburgh Light Up Night 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of Carnegie Mellon College of Fine Arts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:16, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:16, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset over Hammerschlag Hall and the Cathedral of Learning 2 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sunset --Pudelek 22:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Heinz Memorial Chapel, interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heinz Memorial Chapel, interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 'Mystic Enchantment' in Minter Gardens, Chillwack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon School of Drama set workshop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon School of Drama Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architecture Classroom in the Carnegie Mellon College of Fine Arts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 23:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon Hamerschlag Hall and Scott Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 23:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Pittsburgh panoramas, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Pittsburgh panoramas has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Aerial view of Capitol Hill at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.jpg

Beautiful photo. One question, though: is this really an aerial shot, or is it from a tall building? - Jmabel ! talk 03:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

• Yes, you're right, it is actually from a tall building. I was using one of the definitions of aerial, which may mean "Positioned high up; elevated" which doesn't necessarily have to be from an aircraft. But it seems to be misleading, so I will rename the file. Thanks for bringing this up! dllu (t,c) 09:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon Scott Hall under construction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon School of Drama Interior Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solar decathlon building at Carnegie Mellon University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 15:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hillman Library, exterior (brighter).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hillman Library, exterior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fraser Valley Panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Bookstore 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Blue hour? Category for blue hour? --XRay 06:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the UBC Student Union Building 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Interior of the UBC Student Union Building 13.jpg

Hi Dllu, indeed you were right, my attention was on the left side and I did not noticed the very big and ugly grey borders at right! :) Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the UBC Student Union Building 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cordova Street, 2016 Blue Hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centerm at night as seen from Canada Place.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Alumni Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concourse B, Chicago O'Hare airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tea eggs ez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Lauderdale Tower

Thanks for the lines. Despite having done an automated distortion correction at the RAW state of editing that one, I was never entirely sure I'd eliminated it. I'll see what I can do. Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primanti bros oakland at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Domdomegg 13:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Square, Vancouver 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, conviced, this means though that you were not properly centered --Poco a poco 18:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Centerm at night as seen from Canada Place.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Centerm at night as seen from Canada Place.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soylent 2.0 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot Metal Bridge 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice resolution, but image too dark. Needs a slight CW rotation as well. --Slaunger 21:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC) Thanks for the comment. I've significantly brightened it. However, I don't think it needs a CW rotation. Bear in mind that the riverbank on the other side is not parallel to the image plane, nor is it infinitely far away, so it cannot be treated as a true horizon. Dllu 01:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC) That bridge is still quite dark, but I uess OK for QI. -- Slaunger 07:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh skyline and Birmingham Bridge seen from Hot Metal Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice to see this Q1photo --Michielverbeek 07:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Cathedral in Pittsburgh as seen from Fifth Avenue in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo and perspective good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 22:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield Towers in Pittsburgh in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower at PNC Plaza as seen at Fifth at Wood in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BNY Mellon Center (Pittsburgh) as seen at Fifth at Grant in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Four Gateway Center in Pittsburgh in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Ermell 06:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

QI promo

Hi, thanks for the positive feedback. Regarding the resolution - I've already uploaded them as-is from the camera... - Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

• That's very strange, because the Sony A7R II should take 42 megapixel images, but the files you uploaded were only a quarter of that. Perhaps a setting in your camera is not right? In any case, the photos are nice and, even at the current resolution, are definitely QI in my opinion. dllu (t,c) 18:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

• The problem here is the lens, it wasn't a full-frame... - Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

• I see, that makes sense now. dllu (t,c) 22:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco Cable Car 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SF MUNI 8128 Neoplan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco panorama as seen from Bernal Heights in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Well done! --Hubertl 09:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh City-County Building in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hobart Building 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco Ferry Building during sunset 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon Cohon University Center 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunnyledge, Pittsburgh, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinz Memorial Chapel, exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 12:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunnyvale Caltrain Station on a rainy day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Theatre, San Francisco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacramento at Kearny, San Francisco 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pier 39, San Francisco 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)